Along the way we find out who each person on the pilgrimage is from Chaucer’s eyes. The Canterbury Tales is a unique example of greed because it can be traced through many characters. Not one individual character represents greed. Instead, multiple people exhibit this sin through their descriptions and their actions. For example, Chaucer reveals avarice in the Miller’s description when he says, “He knew well how to steal corn and charge threefold; and yet he had a thumb of gold, all right”(Chaucer 45:564-565). The Miller was willing to take advantage of others to benefit himself, the basis of greed. Not only did laborer like the Miller commit these sins, religious leaders were also guilty. This includes the wealthy Friar who took bribes, and bribed others, to teach false lessons of the bible to the illiterate society. The General Prologue it states, “He knew the taverns well in every town, and every innkeeper and barmaid better than a leper or a beggarwoman”(Chaucer 27:240-242). This shows that not only did he take bribes, he also did not perform the duties that a respectable churchman is responsible
Along the way we find out who each person on the pilgrimage is from Chaucer’s eyes. The Canterbury Tales is a unique example of greed because it can be traced through many characters. Not one individual character represents greed. Instead, multiple people exhibit this sin through their descriptions and their actions. For example, Chaucer reveals avarice in the Miller’s description when he says, “He knew well how to steal corn and charge threefold; and yet he had a thumb of gold, all right”(Chaucer 45:564-565). The Miller was willing to take advantage of others to benefit himself, the basis of greed. Not only did laborer like the Miller commit these sins, religious leaders were also guilty. This includes the wealthy Friar who took bribes, and bribed others, to teach false lessons of the bible to the illiterate society. The General Prologue it states, “He knew the taverns well in every town, and every innkeeper and barmaid better than a leper or a beggarwoman”(Chaucer 27:240-242). This shows that not only did he take bribes, he also did not perform the duties that a respectable churchman is responsible