Examples Of Deductive Reasoning

Decent Essays
Deductive reasoning is based on specific evidence in order to prove that an individual is guilty of an offence. Inductive reasoning, also called inductive logic, is reasoning that goes beyond what we actually know in order to make a conclusion. Deductive reasoning is done with actual evidence while inductive reasoning is based on a proposition. The textbook give a great example of inductive reasoning, “All of john Wayne Gacy’s victims found to date were male-so Gacy did not kill females”. It uses information that has been obtained in order to further solve the problem. Arguments in deductive reasoning are either valid or invalid as for inductive reasoning; arguments can be strong or weak. Typically conclusions that are formed from deductive

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    New alternative: It is possible that the aforementioned argument would not ended in conflict if the Toulmin model of argument was implemented. The following example is a possible argument using the Toulmin argument approach: • Ground: Research studies indicate that most of baseball players’ rotator cuff muscle (muscles involved in throwing) injuries are due to muscle imbalances. • Warrant: There is a high possibility of injury by doing inappropriate exercises or by neglecting important exercises.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The strength of the argument is in understanding the…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true. * A master of this art is none other than Sherlock Holmes, the brilliant detective from Arthur Conan Doyle’s mystery story “The Red-Headed League”. In this story, a job is given to Holmes by Jabez Wilson, a pawn shop owner. Wilson explains to Holmes he was a part of The Red-Headed League because of his fiery red hair, but it was abruptly suspended as shown in this statement: “The Red-Headed League is dissolved October 9, 1890”. The Red-Headed League offered Wilson a job with a salary of 4£ for copying Encyclopædia Britannica for four hours.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Introduction Over the last few thousand years or so, the question of whether God exists or not has been under serious examination. There are only two answers to this question: either you do believe in God’s existence or you don’t. Even if all the evidence in the entire universe leans towards the latter, some people still assume that a supernatural being exists. Blaise Pascal was one of these individuals, and he also believes that regardless of whether it’s probable or not, it’s in your best interest to believe in the existence of God. This idea is called Pascal’s Wager, and it states that although the odds may be against it, the payoff for believing in God is much more fulfilling than not believing.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deductive reasoning, according to Handley in his article “Fluency And Belief Bias In Deductive Reasoning: New Indices For Old Effects”, is when the writer of the essay provides a “logical argument”(Handley) for the readers. The first premise Carr uses is that we can only learn something when we are one hundred percent focused. Carr writes “Only when we pay deep attention to a new piece of information are we able to associate it meaningfully and systematically ‘with knowledge already established in memory”(Carr 217). Carr uses deductive reasoning leading the reader think about his conclusion that the internet is making us dumber.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police disregarded and violated the rights provided to the defender by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution, which requires probable cause before conducting a search or making an arrest. The action behind the defendant’s Reckless Conduct, or the act of walking on CTA property while clutching a bag filled with food during the 4th of July, cannot be considered legitimate evidence for probable’s cause. Probable cause entails more than a mere suspicion, which in this case also showed prejudiced attitudes by the police officers. As if this personal damage of profiling Muhammad as a terrorist because of her traditional Islamic clothing, the police proceeded to sign a complaint charging her with Reckless Conduct. Once again, the police officer’s…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Problem of Induction and Induction Without a Problem are two similar writings both talking about induction and how it affects the way we believe. Though they may both talk about induction and their similarities, there are also a few differences between the two stories. The main question being do you need scientific support for induction? In my opinion you do, because without the support, you base it off knowledge and knowledge can misguide you at times.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Criminal Justice System

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Review Questions Identify and discuss two different goals that the criminal justice system has. Two different goals that the criminal justice system has are deterrence and rehabilitation/reintegration. There are two types of deterrence in criminal justice. The first is general deterrence, where criminal justice exemplifies what happens to people that do commit a crime, which the crime can be specific or general.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Logical fallacies are basically common errors. Everyone single person every day makes a common error. The logical fallacies that I will be discussing are the sunk cost fallacy, slippery slope fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, post hoc ergo propter hoc, ad hominem, red herring, and the straw man fallacy. It happens to everyone of us, even though we may not even realize it sometimes. Sunk cost fallacy is getting into something and not wanting to get out of it because you may have put a lot of time or spent some money with that specific project.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Antony refutes Brutus’s claim that Caesar is ambitious. Antony claims “When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: / Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: / Yet Brutus says he was ambitious ;”( Shakespeare, 10). Antony uses deductive reasoning to come to the false conclusion that Caesar is ambitious because of his determent character traits to take over Rome as a tyrant. The major premise Antony pleas is that people who are ambitious are determined to take control and the minor premise is that Caesar is ambitious. For instance, Caesar cares so much about the Romans that he would cry for them and even hand them property (Shakespeare, 10).…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. The purposes of criminal punishment can simply be divided into two schools of thought: retributionists and preventionists. Identify, define, and discuss the several criminal law key term words that are associated with these two schools of thought and conclude with your opinion of which is the most effective.....or why all are concurrently effective. Be thorough since this is important concerning the purposes of punishment in a modern society. 1.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By making observations it will lead you to a conclusion most of the time. Inductive reasoning also has its weaknesses. One of them are the fact that it is very limited. You might think with the observations you did your conclusions must be certain but by simply making further observations you can now prove those old conclusions wrong. That is also why there is aways changes in many scientific conclusions, other people just observe further and prove old conclusions are wrong.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States criminal justice system is made up of two models that criminals face concerning the sentencing phase of the courts. The two are indeterminate model and the determinate model. When you look at both of these models there are advantages and disadvantage that effect not only society but the criminals that are to fulfill the path of the models. The sentencing in the indeterminate model is formatted for rehabilitation of the inmate through his/her positive action while incarcerated. This positive rehabilitation sets up the end result of being released from the sentencing imposed for the crime.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Informal fallacies appeal to the ignorance of an inadequately supported argument and can be observed in everyday scenarios. Although many are incognizant of their effect on communication, being aware of the format of an argument can aid an individual in reaching their desired conclusion to any situation they are encountered with. When an argument is presented with limited alternatives, the omission of other choices provides the argument with a false dilemma causing the arguer in the discussion to be limited in their response. If an argument is approached with a false dilemma, the arguer is guiding the defendant to respond in the way that best supports his desired outcome. By limiting the freedom to explore other alternatives, the defendant is left to constitute a response that may not be in their best interest.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays