Examples Of Corrupt Leaders In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
There are mostly two kinds of leaders, an arrogant leader, and a confident leader. Of course there are different kinds of leaders, but most leaders are divided into those two categories. An arrogant leader would mostly be all-talk and would be disliked by his own subordinates. A skilled arrogant leader, however, would be more liked by his subordinates since his skills would make up for his attitude. It is the same with a confident, it mostly depends on an individual’s skill.
An example of an arrogant leader would be Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar can be considered a skilled arrogant leader because of his excellent leadership skills and his arrogant attitude. His victory over Pompey is proof of his leading skills, and what he said to the soothsayer, “He is a dreamer; let us leave him: pass.”, sounds a little bit arrogant. Another example of his
…show more content…
Brutus isn’t arrogant at all. Brutus’s main cause is only what is best for Rome, and not himself. Even the other senators of the play consider Brutus to be a noble person and not an arrogant person. “O Cassius! If you could but win the noble Brutus to our party.” is proof that people think of him well. Another proof that Brutus was not arrogant is that in the play, it is written, “ But all Rome knew Brutus to be an honorable man: his name would lend respect to the deed.”. Not only that, Brutus killed Julius Caesar not because of envy, but because he thought it was the best for Rome.
Another example of a confident leader is Cassius, although he is slightly different from Brutus. Cassius undoubtedly has good leadership skills. He managed to to convince dozens of senators, including Brutus, to assassinate Julius Caesar. Cassius also doesn’t consider himself to be the best at everything. However, Cassius is different from Brutus because he killed Caesar out of hatred. Even though his reasons stood their grounds, he mostly killed him due to hatred and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Brutus As A Villain Essay

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brutus may have done bad things and was senseless in some of his actions, but like a tragic hero, throughout the story he does do many positive things to benefit Rome. An example of him putting Rome first is said in the quote,…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter the Great or Odysseus: Two Leaders of Great Superiority Only One can be on Top An effective leader is someone who has a large impact on someone else, they can have good qualities such as being inspiring or they can have bad qualities such as being self-centered. There are two leaders, Peter the Great, a leader of Russia in the 1600s, and Odysseus from the epic poem, The Odyssey, about Odysseus and his journeys across the pacific ocean with his crew during 1200 B.C. It was important that Peter was advanced during his time because the country of Russia was very behind and Peter modernized his country to bring it to where it needed to be. It is a bad quality for Odysseus to be self-centered during 1200 B.C.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Qualities that good leaders should have are courage, trustworthiness, and wisdom. Odysseus in the Odyssey and Samuel, Saul, and David in the Books of Samuel, all display these characteristics. Most people think that a leader is supposed to be perfect and have no flaws but that is not true. Odysseus, Samuel, Saul and David all had their own faults while leading but they still managed to lead victoriously. The first quality that a good leader should have is courage.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Brutus Noble Or Noble

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The play shows Brutus as being a noble man, and he always tries to stay true to his title. I think that he is still noble in the end. When talking with the conspirators, Cassius brings up the mention to do an oath, to keep the loyalty of the conspirators. Brutus disagrees, saying that if they were true Romans they wouldn’t need an oath of secrecy.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Odysseus Leader Analysis

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What are the qualities a successful, effective leader should possess? Respect. Skill. Bravery. In the epic poem, ¨The Odyssey¨, written by Homer, Odysseus, the main character, proves himself to possess all the qualities of a successful leader.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good Leadership Qualities Make a Good Leader Many people are eligible to be a good leader but one bad quality can ruin it. Caesar, Antony, and Brutus demonstrate throughout Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, what qualities make up a good leader. Intelligence, honesty, and respect are just some of the qualities that can make up a good leader. Antony and Brutus prove that they’re good leaders by their actions.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil In Julius Caesar

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus, as per Mark Antony, had an uncommonly fine character. Toward the finish of Act V, Scene 5, Antony says of his vanquished adversary: This was the noblest Roman of them all. Every one of the schemers spare just he Did that they did in envy of extraordinary Caesar.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    it is easy to see through Caesar’s words that he is arrogant: “I am as consistent as the northern star"(Shakespeare 39). this quote from the play is Caesar comparing himself the northern star, the star that has…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Flawed But Not Forgotten Every human has a flaw, but some can be the cause of their own demise. The flaw of Marcus Brutus in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare causes his own downfall as the tragedy unravels. Brutus is the tragic hero because he has all of the necessary traits a tragic hero needs, according to Aristotle. Aristotle defines a tragic hero as a man of noble stature or high position who causes his own destruction for a greater cause or principle.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Brutus is an honourable man because he would die for the good of the people of Rome and because of this the people of Rome love Brutus. The people show Brutus honour and praise which opens Brutus to manipulation and flattery. A good example of this is when we see Cassius talking to Brutus and he says “Tell me, good Brutus, can you see yourself?” in this particular conversation they are talking about the nobility of Brutus and Caesar. This conversation with Cassius…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Brutus possesses the fatal flaw of being easily manipulated/tricked. This ultimately is Brutus’s downfall as he is easily controlled by his peers. In the beginning of play, Brutus is seen upset and “at war” with himself. Cassius attempts to boost his mood, by telling him how well-respected he is.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marcus Brutus: A Tragic Hero Bound by Radical Idealism William Irwin Thompson once said, “Idealistic reformers are dangerous because their idealism has no roots in love, but is simply a hysterical and unbalanced rage for order amidst their own chaos.” Brutus as we generally think about him is seen as patriotic, honorable, self controlled, stoic and quite possibly impractical. In many arguments, Brutus has simply fallen victim to Cassius’s radical idealism, manipulation,and tactfulness. However, no man is without fault, as Brutus can be attributed as an idealist in his own right. Idealism, in terms of philosophy, is ‘the tendency to represent things in an ideal form, or as they might or should be rather than as they are.’…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus being naive is also a reason what came to his downfall. Having the state of mind that everything was all under control and individuals had a quality of being honorable and noble men he was. Brutus had a lot of trust in men and figured that they will not turn their back and he to him like how they did to Caesar. Brutus allows Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral but can not talk anything bad about the conspirators. “And you shall speak in the same pulpit whereto I am going.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Macbeth Vs Machiavelli

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A successful leader is one that brings prosperity to a region while upkeeping good morals. They must seek to better the state of the region and keep the interests of the people in mind. Two works of literature that illustrate this theme of what makes a good leader are The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and Macbeth by William Shakespeare. In The Prince, Machiavelli uses rulers of past and present to illustrate qualities necessary in a good leader. In Macbeth, Macbeth, a valiant war hero, becomes king of Scotland through immoral means and suffers greatly due to his unchecked ambition.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus has a long soliloquy during Act II of Julius Caesar, in which he makes several claims regarding Julius Caesar himself. Brutus claims: if Caesar were to become king, his personality will become pure ambition and ruthlessness, and killing him will be the only way to stop him. Brutus establishes his credibility by stating he has no ill will towards Caesar; however, he wants common good for the Roman people. This is a clear example of Ethos, “I know no cause to spurn at him, but for the general” (2.1.11-12). Brutus then states his concern for a personality change in Caesar if he were to become king, supporting his argument.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays