V For Vendetta Authoritarianism

Improved Essays
“The people should not be afraid of the government, the government should be afraid of the people.” These are the words said by V in the movie V for Vendetta. But how can a citizen live in an authoritarian state? How can a dictator achieve absolute control of power?

By definition, authoritarianism is a government that governs without the consent of those being governed. In authoritarian states, there is only one ruler whether it may be a king, a military leader, dictator or even a president that will rule the government. Usually, the causes of why some states become Authoritarian are that there is some violent civil conflict that is going on or it could be a by-product of a Monarchy rule. It can also be a response to the abuse of a country’s
…show more content…
In an authoritarian state, it asks its citizens to let go of their pleasure (whether it be personal or interpersonal), for the good of the state, however, citizens raised not having the authoritarian character will reject to make the sacrifices of letting go of their pleasure. They will deny that they exist the state but rather than the state exists to serve them better (Neill & Reich, 1994). If we look for the movie V for Vendetta, the Norsefire party made problems to the society for it to be a reason for them to turn into a totalitarian state. This is because the Norsefire party wanted to take control of Britain, and for the High Chancellor to gain authority and power. According to Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, that humans will go back to their “state of nature” when there is no governing body/government that would rule the people. In a state of nature, there is no political organization and someone in authority to enforce laws. With people in the state of nature, we would not be able to vote, achieve success, learning, enrich our country’s cultural achievements; in short, we would be uncivilized people of the country.

Dictatorship has many benefits yet consequences too. Some of the benefits are that it helps in social stability, discipline and order and in economic development, however, the consequences are: Dictatorship’s priority is to maintain power,
…show more content…
Personally, if we want stability and order in our country, maybe there are possible solutions or ways to avoid leading it into a dictatorship. A great dictator is someone who could bring fundamental change and sets a long term vision for the state. Our next generation of children wouldn’t want to see a country that is in chaos, rather a country that is on its way for change. Peace is not too far anymore to be attained but if we really want change to happen; the change that we want to see should begin in each of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Absolute Power DBQ

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Time and time again throughout history mankind has fought for control, for power. As a child, everyone dreamed to be able to single-handedly run the world, to have absolute power. Absolutism, or an autocracy, is when the ability to rule a nation or empire is only given to a single person, with all decisions and actions affecting the country done with the order or consent from them. Autocratic rulers often limited the power of nobles and religious authorities, used military force to expand their nation’s borders, created laws, and distributed justice as it was seen fit (Document 1). Lord Acton, an English historian, had once said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely.”…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In both a modern day dictatorship such freedoms as the Freedom of speech and press are repressed. And in some cases resources and food could be limited in a county that could cause civil unrest and lead to revolutions. Most if not all of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other than through the eyes of the dictators, there is no way to positively look at totalitarian governments. When the government has total power over both a state and the individuals within it, basic personal freedoms such as privacy, security, and individuality are thrown out the window. Totalitarian dictators such as Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini not only corrupted Russia, Germany, and Italy, respectively, but killed millions upon millions of people in the process. The scary part about history is that it often repeats itself, and with the upcoming presidential election, there is a possibility of such an occurrence. Many people are aware of Donald Trump’s campaign slogan, “Make America Great Again!”…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a totalitarian government they attempt to control every citizen in what they do, who they associate with, what they say, and even what they think. Big Brother is the…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dictatorship is defined as form of government in which one person or a small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations. While the United States is known as a democracy and was founded on the beliefs of a democracy, in recent years many people have begun to compare America's government to that of a dictatorship. The use of executive orders is one way that this can be explained. An executive order is a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law. An executive order can be implemented with out congressional oversight.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Depending on the type of rule, a society can either lose its ability to function freely through celebrating the unique opinions of its citizens. Authoritarian rule such as that of Hitler’s time, can utilize ultimate scare and control to brainwash the citizens into believing of a false reality where safety can be guaranteed through conformity. This control powers the central authority, wiping away any traces of individualism in the society. Through constructing a dystopian world with communistic tendencies in “Harrison Bergeron”, Vonnegut highlights the theme of losing individualism through absolute conformity and control of society, in an effort to warn individuals of dangers that can arise with absolute authority in societies.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are many counties with many different forms of government. Although, what is widely considered to be the best form of government is democracy, it allows citizens to have a variety of rights and freedoms while putting constraints on the government’s power. Authoritarian regimes on the other hand are widely considered to be awful forms of government. Authoritarian regimes have centralized leadership without any real checks on power and suppression of civil liberties. This begs the question, if authoritarian regimes are so bad, why are they seen so much?…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Authoritarian government is very different than a Democracy for many reasons, but I will describe two. The democracy has an election to tell who is the leader and in an authoritarian they are forced into it. Also, the authoritarian government has unlimited power over their people and democracy has a certain amount of power they can have. These are just a couple of ways they are different.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NO! STOP THAT! Dictatorship can be pretty cool when you’re the one dictating, but it’s not so cool in the eyes’ of the people. People in the past have tried to avoid tyranny, which is the act of dictatorship, because it had lead to many fights. One solution the people had was creating a constitution in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787, but was that enough?…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States has a very strong democracy compared to an authoritarian government. Authoritarian governments enforce strict obedience to authority and expects everyone to follow it. The United States on the other hand has citizens who stand up for the country. I will tell you about the difference in leading styles and the extent of the government power. Authoritarian governments inherit their positions or take it forcefully.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dbq Italy Totalitarianism

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Totalitarianismrefers to an authoritarian political system or state that regulates and controls nearly every aspect of the public and private sectors. Totalitarianismregimes establish completepolitical, social, and cultural control over their subjects, and are usually headed by acharismatic leader. In general, Totalitarianism involves a one party rule, typically led by a dictator; an attempt to mobilize the entire populationin support of the official state ideology; and an intoleranceof activities which are not directed towards the goals of the state, usually intendedto repressionand economic controlof business, labor unions, churches and political parties. Under a totalitarian form of government each individual is responsible to another in…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Governments and Power Governments need the support of their citizens in order to stay in power. Most of the governments try to sustain their power by doing different kinds of propaganda and manipulating their citizens. Those governments think that they need to have their citizens under control and prevent any dangerous movement that is opposing the government, by various techniques. While a few of the governments use force on the people and are harsh to stay in power, most of the governments subtly convince their citizens by falsely promising welfare to them and furthermore affecting their thoughts in various ways to impose their selfish ideas on them. Governments are affecting their citizens’ thoughts by falsely telling that what the government…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his article “The rise of illiberal democracy” Fareed Zakaria used a term “illiberal democracy” in the journal “Foreign Affairs” in 1997. In the article he discussed the level of liberties and freedom in the countries that are democracies officially. He divided them into two polar groups: liberal democracies and illiberal democracies. He also gave the description for each of the groups and the reasons why he determined this or that country into a particular group.…

    • 2348 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondly the authoritarian regime political system is full of corruption, bribery, cronyism and nepotism while a totalitarian state has advisors to the government who are generally picked by merit/ dedication and their loyalty to the state and party. Thirdly an authoritarian state if you are caught committing a crime you can be exiled, torture, abused, imprisoned or purged. While in a totalitarian regime you are spying on your neighbors, relatives, parents, friends …. They threaten, use torture, imprisonment or death. But, most of the society believe in the ideals of the state and complies willingly.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three different leadership styles with many variations in-between. The difference in these three leadership styles is the level and location of control. At one extreme is the autocratic leader, which makes independent decisions on how to proceed. On the opposite end of the spectrum there are laissez faire leaders, which have a hands-off approach and allows the subordinates to make all the decisions. However, the democratic leader is the medium of the three, which allows more input of the decision making process for his or subordinates.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays