Strategies: Argumentation: “The more often older adults were told that a given claim was false, the more likely they were to accept it as true after several days have passed.”
Questions:
Argumentation:
The author of this article uses this technique to refer back to social experiments done in the past to prove his point about why many Trump supporters don’t see why some of Trump’s ideas are necessarily good nor beneficial to the country.
This technique captures the author’s contemplative attitude towards the issue about Trump supporters not wanting to listen to some people’s reasoning when it comes to the discussion of politics because he introduces the topic with the description of an image about how a Trump supporter covered his ears in …show more content…
Though, in reality, it will backfire and make the person think their opinion is the real and right opinion. As the article goes more in depth, bringing example of people at Trump rallies and Trump himself, the reader is more likely to get a better understanding.
Overall Text Questions:
The author’s primary audience is the people who don’t advocate from Trump. His secondary audience is for those who are simply curious. He speaks to the American people and anyone who wonders why Trump supporters don’t tend to listen to their reasoning directly.
“The study showed two interesting things: People are more likely to accept information if it’s presented unemotionally, in graphs; and they’re even more accepting if the factual presentation is accompanied by “affirmation” that asks respondents to recall an experience that made them feel good about themselves.” This quote from the article persuades people to attempt to convince others with no emotion (graphs, charts, data, etc.) rather than simply going up to them and lecturing them. In order to get them to see your side, straight facts that are visibly backed up is a way to get them to see your train of
Questions:
Argumentation:
The author of this article uses this technique to refer back to social experiments done in the past to prove his point about why many Trump supporters don’t see why some of Trump’s ideas are necessarily good nor beneficial to the country.
This technique captures the author’s contemplative attitude towards the issue about Trump supporters not wanting to listen to some people’s reasoning when it comes to the discussion of politics because he introduces the topic with the description of an image about how a Trump supporter covered his ears in …show more content…
Though, in reality, it will backfire and make the person think their opinion is the real and right opinion. As the article goes more in depth, bringing example of people at Trump rallies and Trump himself, the reader is more likely to get a better understanding.
Overall Text Questions:
The author’s primary audience is the people who don’t advocate from Trump. His secondary audience is for those who are simply curious. He speaks to the American people and anyone who wonders why Trump supporters don’t tend to listen to their reasoning directly.
“The study showed two interesting things: People are more likely to accept information if it’s presented unemotionally, in graphs; and they’re even more accepting if the factual presentation is accompanied by “affirmation” that asks respondents to recall an experience that made them feel good about themselves.” This quote from the article persuades people to attempt to convince others with no emotion (graphs, charts, data, etc.) rather than simply going up to them and lecturing them. In order to get them to see your side, straight facts that are visibly backed up is a way to get them to see your train of