Example Of Jury Nullification

Improved Essays
Jury Nullification To condemn a person for an act that he or she did that broke the law is hard to decide. The jury is there to assist so the decision of the case does not depend solely on the judge. A jury consists of usually twelve people. They are there to come up with a verdict based on the evidence presented to them at court. To be part of such an important body comes with responsibilities and rights. One in question, is the right to nullify a law. Jury nullification is when the jury knows that the person is guilty but rejects the evidence as well as refuses to apply the law because either the juror wants to send a message about a social issue that is larger than the case itself or because the results stated by the law is opposing to …show more content…
Therefore, causing disorder and chaos within the criminal justice system and allowing jurors to follow their own feelings. Another concern is that jury nullification will increase the number of hung juries. Also known as deadlock jury, a hung jury occurs when a jury cannot reach a verdict after an extended deliberation (Black’s Law Dictionary). As a result, the case is called in for a mistrial. The case may be later presented to a new jury or it can be decided to not pursue the case any further. Another issue is the jury being bias. A juror may just want to convict the defendant not guilty, simply because he has the power to do so. Even though there may be overwhelming evidence proving the defendant guilty for the crime committed. These may be sufficient reasons for individuals to disagree with jury nullification. In some instances, the court will refuse to instruct the jurors of their power to nullify; to let them know that they are the judges of the law and facts (72 A.L.R. 899). They will disregard this and have the jurors figure it out on their own. Despite the odds, jurors will have to make a decision that they believe is appropriate in respect to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jacobson arguing that the court had abused its discretionary powers when it did not allow Jacobson’s attorney’s to poll the jury, and instead assumed that the jurors had abided by the restrictions placed on them to avoid news reports. The due process clause guarantees everyone the right to a trial by an impartial jury, and this was denied to Sandra L. Jacobson when public broadcasting was clearly impartial towards the prosecution, and the jurors had the means to watch said report, which would render them biased. Legally, if there is the possibility that jurors may have been exposed to material that is prejudicial, then an appellate court should be able to gauge the exposure and determine the prejudice of the jury. The trial court was able to determine that unfair prejudice from this broadcasting station, including information that would be inadmissible in trial and would therefore contaminate the jury. Several cases have shown that warnings alone do not neutralize the potential for jury contamination, so a trial court should not rely solely on the warnings it gives jurors.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Jury takes an oath that it will listen to all of the evidence during the trial and without bias will examine the evidence and determine if there is sufficient evidence that O.J. Simpson had committed the crimes…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Occupy Denver Eric Brandt is a white male in his late forties. He is 5’8” and 200 pounds, dressed in black shorts and a yellow shirt, with black font on it that reads “Fuck Bad Cops.” He is single and homeless. Eric is a former U.S Navy nuclear engineer. He has been to many countries and speaks four languages.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, when the prosecution does the exact same, then it is seen as mere execution of judicial powers. But there is no suggestion why one is better than the other, besides the fact that prosecutors are more susectible to corruption as opposed to everyday people who come together in the court for a single case (Somin, 2015, para. 2, ad 3). The author implies that the Founders placed such power in peoples hands to keep the government in check and make sure it does not exercise more power than it actually has. Consequently, the criminal and civil laws that are exercised in modern days might confuse jury members themselves. That is, there are crimes which should not be illegal at all or carry much lesser penalties, hence, jury nullification is more possible in these instances, rather than in broadly accepted…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the last 250 years, U.S. citizens have been given a controversial option of a jury or bench trial. Not everyone agrees with the bench trials. Although jury trials sound like a good idea, it is actually true that bench trials are better because it guarantees the right verdict almost all the time. Jury trials choose ordinary citizens off the street. For example, with the society today, people cannot stay off their phone, which makes them vulnerable to hearing or gathering false details about the trial.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jury nullification is a way of people showing what they think about a law: The ultimate purpose of any true justice system is to help society by removing and punishing people that are dangerous to it. Specifically, all democratic regimes are based on the idea of people possessing the power, believing that leaving the government to society itself is the best way to go about making decisions because the people are competent and are the best at knowing what is good for them. Keeping jury nullification allows the people to show what they think about a law. For example, if many marijuana cases were nullified this would be a clear indication that the people don"t think these laws are good for society, the laws need to be altered, or the sentences are unreasonable. Consider this, laws are made for the good of society so if society feels like a law is not beneficial the law's purpose is undermined.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury nullification is the point at which the jury knowing and intentionally rejects the proof or refusal to apply the law wither in light of the fact that the jury needs to communicate something specific about some social issue that is bigger than the case itself, or on the grounds that the outcome directed by law is in opposition to the jury feeling of justice, morality, or fairness. In addition, an optional demonstration is not a legitimate sanction capacity of the jury. It is the thought to be conflicting with the jury obligation to restore a decision construct exclusively in light of the law and the certainties of the case. The jury does not have a privilege to defense, and the direction is not allowed to exhibit the possibility of invalidation…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jodi Arias Case Analysis

    • 1546 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I decided to do option #2 major case observation and analysis. The online case I decided to do my research on was the Jodi Arias case. I believe the reason I picked this case over the others was this case was very interesting to me. Sure the O.J. Simpson case was a big one, but we all know he got away with murder. The George Zimmerman’s case didn’t last that long, and I felt that I would just find the same information in my research.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury nullification provides the power necessary to prevent manic judges and prosecutors from abusing their power. Judge Bazelon agrees the jury should be told of their…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The article Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice system was written in December, 1995 in a Yale Law Journal by Paul Butler, and than later republished in 2015 in Introduction to Legal Studies. This article was published in North America, for academics in law stream, or anyone with an interest in law. The author poses different views on the racism in todays court rooms faced by African American, particularly by the men. In this essay, I will be analyzing this case from the perspective of white girl so I really can’t say shit on the subject.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many controversial issues in the United States criminal justice system. In recent years, the contentious issue of ethnic discrimination has been in the forefront of several trials. There are some individuals who believe that jury nullification should be used by minorities on juries to acquit defendants of color. Jury nullification is defined as a process where a jury acquits a defendant, even though the members of the jury believe the defendant is guilty of the charges. The concept is that the system is biased toward the ethnic majority and nullification can be used to balance the system for minorities.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This shows how someone who doesn’t want to be there wouldn’t take the case seriously, not putting full thought into the decision. If a jury were to be made, they should all want to be there and take the case…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This spurs others to at least reconsider their verdict. Afterward, votes are changed as well as perspectives and lives. Votes are cast again and again, each time there are more not guilty verdicts. As the jurors continue to battle among themselves, minds are…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics