Example Of A Rhetorical Ecology

Improved Essays
My rhetorical ecology’s primary goal is to articulate the many levels of statistical data surrounding gun control in the US. I start off the presentation with the Bill of Rights and immediately provide commentary from individuals who played a fundamental role in the foundation of the United States. Then, I state current gun control laws currently in place. From here on out, I expand on specific analytics: mass shootings, other deadlier killers, and total firearm violence. The audience this argument appeals to is people who react to gun control regulations after mass shootings occur. These situations represent .3% of all gun violence; making public policy in an emotional state will not accurately address the entire problem regarding firearm safety. There is a need for more gun control, but policymakers should target the leading causes of weapon fatalities and their outlets to achieve more effective results, like reducing inner-city crime. …show more content…
This digital platform permitted me to work in an environment with virtually no spatial restrictions. By choosing this medium, I gained access to certain corroborative properties that show how different sections of information relate to each other. Furthermore, the format of artifacts I selected allow me to establish a logical argument, as well as maintain credibility bolstered by reputable sources. By using Prezi, I subjected myself to a specific flow of information. More specifically, the limited maneuverability of the pathways within the site. This inherently guided my argument to form a specific

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Katrina Herrera Mrs. Clark AP English 3 08 February 2018 Argumentative Essay Final Draft: Gun Control Gun control is one of the most controversial topics in American politics. More than one-third of Americans in the United States own firearms in their households. It is estimated that more than thirty-thousand people are shot each year due to murders, accidents, police intervention, suicide attempts and suicide. Gun control laws are not strict enough for the safety of our society. The purchase and possession of firearms should be banned in order to prevent potential public shootings, protect the environment, and decrease suicide and death rates.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    takes an analytical approach to both sides of the debate. The skyrocketing rise in interest groups advocating on enforcing tougher firearm policies can be attributed to the incremented insecurities within public places, such as the ones mentioned in the documentary. There are no precise demands proclaimed by these advocates for the exception of “tougher firearm policies.” The theory behind their reasoning is that the implementation of tougher firearm policies would subsequently reduce the number of firearms in the streets and thus lower the probability of disasters like the Columbine and Sandy Hook school tragedies. However in similar fashion, the rise in awareness for the interest group advocating the passionate defense of the American’s right to bear arms, known as the N.R.A. (National Rifle Association), has captivated the American political scene and continues to heavily derail this theory by proclaiming their own.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the midst of his article, Charles M. Blow supplements his argument for stricter gun laws by examining and discussing major shootings in recent U.S. history. In introducing these acts of gun violence, he asserts his claim through the repetition of the phrase, “When we learned, to our great horror,” describing the context of a major shooting after each clause. After explaining the context of each instance, he emphasizes on the point that no significant government action was taken in any of these, thus prompting the nation to step further and further towards the decline of the debate on guns. At the end of this build up, Blow juxtaposes “the blood running through our streets” to the “increasingly unfettered right to bear arms,” proposing the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    School Shootings Are Not Enough for Stronger Gun Control Laws The Jonna Semeiks article “We the People Confront Sandy Hook” discuses many different factors that contribute towards explaining why school shootings and gun violence are inadequate to inspire stronger gun control laws. The deaths of children are not enough to offset the strong ties that American society has towards guns as a symbol of freedom, which causes people to respond with internal defense mechanisms that numb the pain of these tragic events instead of feeling a need to take corrective action. Semeiks presents a valid point that gun control reforms are needed; however, in order for that to happen anytime soon, the American people will need to largely shift their attitude on this topic. The author provides several examples successfully supporting that main idea.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “The Guns and Soul of America,” David Brooks, Oct. 6, 2017 The piece “The Guns and Soul of America” by David Brooks, questions the seemingly obvious belief: that as there is an increase in violent deaths and mass shootings involving privately owned firearms, there should also be an increase in stricter gun laws, and a downturn in popular opinion regarding gun ownership. Instead, in his column, Brooks writes to prove that the opposite is the case - that as the instances of mass shootings occur, there is then a correlating pattern of states loosening gun control laws. He then presents a larger issue that may be at hand: that gun ownership, or the opinion against it, represents an American’s “values and identity,” that the argument for or against…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Brady Campaign presents the cons of lenient gun laws by showing emotion and statistics on their website in several ways: “ Of the 33,000 people who die from gun violence in this country, how many could be saved? “ and “ Gun Violence Takes A Massive Toll on American Children “. This presents credibility towards the gun control advocate group as they are able to provide information that can change the society's view on gun control. By providing this information, we are able to understand that this group’s incentive is pressured by the amount of deaths caused by guns. Brady Campaign appeals to society as they persuade you that by enforcing stricter gun laws, you are able to save more lives.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, guns are entwined with escalating arguments about gun control and gun violence. Generally speaking, the quarrel scorches across the American terrain like a raging fire; practically every day there is a news story related to a firing arm. To demonstrate, a recent Central News Network article debriefs gun presence in relation to violence and other tragedies. In this case, guns association with homicides, terrorism and mass shootings. In compliance with statistics, there are more gun owners in the United States than anywhere else in the globe.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is a topic that divides the opinions of the United States citizens and creates endless discussions that until now has not reached a conclusion. The United States has faced many mass shootings during the last years making the supporters of gun control want a reform even more. Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States every year. The United States leads the world with more gun-related homicides and suicides than any other country, according to a 2016 study conducted by the American Journal of Medicine. (“Gun Control”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States holds about 35- 50 percent of the world’s civilian owned guns (Masters, 2016). In reviewing America’s history, this statistic may not seem so striking since guns have always played a major role in society. However, due to the recent events regarding gun violence and an increase in terrorism, the topic of gun control has become problematic for American. When discussing gun control there are mainly two views.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Realizing that his audience includes liberals who know this, Cronin does not try to find any rare statistics that are in favor of firearms. Although he could have just avoided numbers altogether, he concedes that, “statistically speaking, a gun in the home represents a far greater danger to the inhabitants than to the intruder” (Cronin 20*). Although he is giving up some ground on his case, this confession shows readers that Cronin is not trying to fool anyone. He argues that the dilemma of gun ownership is not as much about what the stats says, but instead a decision that “comes from the gut” (Cronin 20*). By admitting that guns could potentially bring danger to his family, it makes the reader even more eager to hear his pro-gun…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays