For the past few generations, many Theologists, Evolutionist, and Atheist have debated over how human beings came into existence. Many Evolutionist, believe that the human race was created by the big bang and we evolved over the years. The question that I have for many evolutionist, is Who is the true Big Banger? Many Evolutionist claim that there is enough evidence to prove that there isn 't a creator. The evolutionist has the script flipped. There is enough evidence to prove that there is a God.
There is a common fact that the necessary components needed for life on a planet don’t have much in common with the components necessary for the Universe. Many Astrophysicists have accepted the fact that the values of the four fundamental forces were discovered less than 1 millionth of a second after the Big Bang. The four fundamental forces are gravity, the electromagnetic force, and the nuclear forces. If any of these forces are altered or anything happens a second off, the universe could not exist. If the ratio between the nuclear and the electromagnetic force had been off by any amount, then the existence of …show more content…
This isn’t rocket science to the average human being. We can all agree that everything has some purpose or function. Since that is widely accepted, we must also accept the fact that NOTHING moves without a reason to do so. There is something that had to cause that movement. For this chain of events to even start, there had to have been an unmoved mover. For this chain of events to even start, there had to have been someone or something to set the universe in motion. It’s similar to the Domino effect. You knock one down and the rest fall. If you noticed there’s someone who initiated the contact to start the fall of the dominoes. Science had even proven on multiple occasions that matter can’t move itself. To say that the “Big Bang was the start of the universe is a contradictory and hypocritical statement. (Floyd) (Phy-Olsen,
There is a common fact that the necessary components needed for life on a planet don’t have much in common with the components necessary for the Universe. Many Astrophysicists have accepted the fact that the values of the four fundamental forces were discovered less than 1 millionth of a second after the Big Bang. The four fundamental forces are gravity, the electromagnetic force, and the nuclear forces. If any of these forces are altered or anything happens a second off, the universe could not exist. If the ratio between the nuclear and the electromagnetic force had been off by any amount, then the existence of …show more content…
This isn’t rocket science to the average human being. We can all agree that everything has some purpose or function. Since that is widely accepted, we must also accept the fact that NOTHING moves without a reason to do so. There is something that had to cause that movement. For this chain of events to even start, there had to have been an unmoved mover. For this chain of events to even start, there had to have been someone or something to set the universe in motion. It’s similar to the Domino effect. You knock one down and the rest fall. If you noticed there’s someone who initiated the contact to start the fall of the dominoes. Science had even proven on multiple occasions that matter can’t move itself. To say that the “Big Bang was the start of the universe is a contradictory and hypocritical statement. (Floyd) (Phy-Olsen,