Niccolo Machiavelli's The Republic

Improved Essays
A man never lived who contributed more to the evolution of the political landscape than Niccolo Machiavelli. Born in a turbulent place in an unstable and perilous period of history, Machiavelli learned the realities of a state. Machiavelli’s greatest work, The Prince, established Political Realism, the acknowledgment that an ideal society is unobtainable, and operating on this knowledge, the focus of those in power should be better spent on political stability, even if immoral action was required to maintain such stability. Without Machiavelli, the idea of a Republic, a state run by the people who reside within the nation under the shared law, whose purpose is to maintain justice and order through constitutional bindings, would not exist as …show more content…
Machiavelli’s father was a Doctor of Law, himself limited by debts he had inherited. Machiavelli was taught grammar, rhetoric, and Latin, educating him to hold a position where he was in charge of all official Florentine government documents. Machiavelli was made leader of the Florentinian militia from 1503-1506, a militia which, despite winning several battles, Florence was eventually defeated by the Medici. These new rulers would deprive Niccol of office, as well as torture him over accusations of conspiracy against the government. After his release, Machiavelli retired to his estate, where he would write both plays and political philosophy, including his most notable work, The Prince. On the 21st of June, 1527, Niccolo Machiavelli died at the age of 58, his tombstone engraved with the Latin phrase,“TANTO NOMINI NULLUM PAR ELOGIUM,” which roughly translates to English as,“So great a name has no adequate …show more content…
In the first sentence of The Prince, Machiavelli stated that all governments were either monarchies or republics, words written at a time when the term republic was synonymous with country. Had Machiavelli not contributed this to political philosophy, his setting the foundation for the end of monarchies, later philosophers, from John Locke to the American founding fathers, would in turn not have changed the political landscape nearly to the effect they had in reality, such a chain of events delaying governments of the people for decades to even a century. A world of monarchs would delay the effects of economic liberalism as seen in reality, and as a result, the massive drop in poverty and death rate, as well as the revolutionary increase in standard of living, would be seen later in time and smaller in magnitude. Machiavelli also founded political realism, forever strengthening governments and national unity. Without these contributions, worrying times such as the two world wars or the Great Depression would, with near certainty, have caused major revolutions across all

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli advocates that the betterment of the state’s popularity should be the prince’s top priority over doing the right thing. However, he emphasizes that it is crucial…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 15th and 16th centuries AD, philosophers emerged in Europe who were more secular than their medieval counterparts. Three of these philosophers were Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and Pico della Mirandola, each of whom had unique ideas about human nature, and the source of people’s joy and sorrow. Machiavelli and Hobbes were both critical of human nature, each proposing their own solution to the flaws they saw in their society, while Mirandola praised humanity’s potential. Niccolò Machiavelli was a political philosopher who lived in Florence, Italy during the Rennaisance. While in exile, and hoping for political employment, he wrote The Prince, in which he claimed that humans, inherently corrupt, must be ruled by a prince who prioritizes effective government over morality and ethics.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli begins with more protectionist view of the congregation, in that the people did not need laws before they felt the need, which shows to prove that the people living in the Machiavelli’s idea of state of nature wished for physical protections first, rather than legal protections over their properties. In contrast, Locke theorizes that the people voluntarily decided to gather to establish a contract between the sovereignty and the people, so that the property rights can be protected. The aim of the government is explicitly stated, and the establishment of the legislative branch being concurrent to the establishment of the executive body implicitly point to the motivation of the social cohesion. However, it is arguable that Machiavellian rationale for the institution of a republican government gradually evolves into the one that is alike to the Lockean rationale for sovereignty, in that the legislation of the constitution is due to the societal pressure to punish those who may harm the others. The mutual agreement for a need of the legislation can be practically identical to consenting to an establishment for civil…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A question gone unanswered by the man who promised an explanation, “What actually does makes a republic tick?”. Joseph Epstein, in his very poorly named article “Machiavelli Explains What Makes Republics Tick”, does not actually talk about a republic, but instead ecompasess the quinecential Machiavellian style in order to give readers a proper understanding of the classic era without reading the work firsthand. Rather than focusing solely on the content of Machiavelli’s masterpieces, he instead displays the way in which these works are distinctively crafted. From his negative, degrading tones, to his constant emphasis on the “flaws of humanity”, Epstein embodies all of the criteria of a true Machiavellian work. Ultimately, Epstein’s choices…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having faith in the leaders was far away from what Machiavelli stimulated, “[…] men are a sorry lot and will not keep their promises to you, and you likewise need not keep yours to them.” (230) plotting, treason, and unlawfulness is what was anticipated from his people. He found that, “they are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain” (228). He found that the obligation of the prince was to rule as he wanted without the say of the…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli uses the Romans—as well as other ancient societies—as data points for modern political structures to emulate when appropriate, and also avoid when needed. Furthermore, Machiavelli’s central claim of how violence and tumult is necessary in a functioning free republic can be seen in how Machiavelli defines the six types of natural regimes. Three of which are “inherently good”, and three of which are “inherently bad” (558). The…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He served as a diplomat for fourteen years in Italy’s Florentine Republic as a second chancellor and secretary of the Ten of Liberty and Peace. Machiavelli attempted a Florentine Militia against the return of the Medici Family which `unfortunately failed. Machiavelli persuades Piero Soderini to help reform Italy’s Florentine Republic to restore it to the city and previous military orders. This act of rebellion against the Medici family caused the expulsion of Machiavelli. He was then tortured, put in jail, and forced to abandon his position in…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For hundreds of years, civilizations have depended on rulers to manage the people and prevent anarchy from erupting. While some leaders execute these actions with ease, others fail to do so and often lose their states to opposing rulers or forces. Niccoló Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher who lived from 1469 to 1527, describes in his book, The Prince, the characteristics he deems necessary in a strong ruler. Throughout the book, Machiavelli uses leaders of his time, like Cesare Borgia and King Louis XII, as examples of what a person should or should not do in order to maintain or improve his state. However, a more recent leader who exemplifies the qualities outlined by Machiavelli is King Louis XIV of France, as he was content with being…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in inducing the transition to a stable republic, the ruler becomes the founding father and will be recognized and glorified as an important figure. This will continue after his death . This goal remains self-interested because of the significant political capital that the leader would receive. Machiavelli operationalizes The Prince as a prerequisite to achieve the republic that he endorses in the Discourses. The Prince is the antidote for the restoration of order and the Discourses is the preservation of liberty.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, The Prince, to the larger extent is still relevant in contemporary society. Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince is not only still relevant, but predicted the fall of monarchies and the rise of other forms of government, such as republics. Although throughout the text Machiavelli does not discuss republics, but rather it discusses monarchies, it is apparently evident the rule of the government in Florence must change some of its ways. The Prince explains how Machiavelli believes the Medici family must go about the change.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays