Evil In Julius Caesar Research Paper

Improved Essays
Many people believe that there is no way that they could do any evil. They believe that they are always good. William Shakespeare portrays Caesar, Cassius, Brutus and Antony as a perfect example for that. Some may argue that those men did no wrong, they were just trying to get what they want. But some may agree that these men have proved themselves evil. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Caesar, Cassius, Brutus and Antony to show that not everybody is perfect even the most loyal men can be evil, and no matter what you really can’t trust anyone. Caesar, Brutus, Cassius, and Antony show evil in this play all in different ways and at different times. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Caesar to …show more content…
Brutus shows innate human evil (I, i i ) he says “ I do believe that these applauses are For some new honors that are heap’d on Caesar.” This is showing Brutus’s innate human evil because Brutus is saying that people will choose Caesar and he isn't okay with that. Brutus thinks that Caesar is too ambitious to be ruler and therefore he does goes with the plan to kill Caesar. Brutus allows Antony to speak at Caesar's funeral because he doesn't believe that Antony is going to do anything that he isn't supposed to.Antony shows innate human evil ( IV, i ) Antony says “ He shall;; not live; look, with a spot I damn him!”This shows Antony is evil because he is showing betrayal and saying that the men that killed Caesar aren't worthy and deserve to be killed. Antony is also saying that he wants more than justice on Cassius, and Brutus because Caesar did not deserve to be stabbed. Everyone in this story shows signs of evil. Cassius, Brutus, Caesar, and Antony all show innate human evil differently but they all want the same thing, power. Brutus and Cassius want Caesar to be killed. So cassius plans to get a group of men together to stab caesar and not make him be ruler. Antony just wants to prove to the people that Caesar wasn’t

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Initially, Antony presents a tone of sincerity and relative agreement with the conspirators: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (). However, as his oration progresses, so too does the tone toward a more dramatic categorization. While Antony prepares to read Caesar’s will to the Roman citizens, he indicates the specific wounds inflicted by Cassius and Brutus: “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through... Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed” (). As a plebeian shouts, “O traitors, villains!”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can death be dignified? Is death the only thing that can be dignified? There are three tragedies that deal with the concept of dignified death and what makes it dignified. In the Greek tragedy Antigone by Sophocles, King Creon indirectly causes the deaths of many because he selfishly keeps a girl from honoring her dead brother. In the tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus kills his best friend for the good of the majority.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play, Julius Caesar, everyone sees Antony as a noble man. He speaks at Caesar’s funeral for the “sake” of Brutus, who the crowd refers to as honorable and sincere. By associating himself with Brutus, Antony gains authority. He skillfully persuades a crowd that loves Brutus, that Caesar wasn't ambitious and that Brutus isn’t honorable. By using verbal irony, an anecdote, and imagery which appeals to the audience's emotions, Antony persuades the crowd that Caesar’s death was not reasonable.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the movie The Dark Night Harvey Dent once articulate that, “You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” Unfortunately, Brutus had been an honorable man until he reached the point where he became the villain. Writing the play Julius Caesar was a man named William Shakespeare in 1599 AD. The main plot of the story is about a man named Brutus who joined a conspiracy against Caesar to stop him from being crowned, but Caesar’s friend Antony intervened. Antony craved revenge on the conspirators so he created an army to cruelly fight the betrayers.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens of Rome, do not lend me your ears, but instead lend me your heart. I stand before you on this tragic day to acknowledge the death of Marcus Brutus. Brutus, who was once the most respected, noble, and honorable man in all of Rome, now lies before us dead, more worthless than dust. Brutus was a stoic judge and the best friend of Julius Caesar, further demonstrating his high status and his nobility. His grievous death was caused by his dire desire for honor and his extraordinary view of idealism.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this point, he is loyal to Rome so he opposes Caesar and plans to harm him. When Cassius is first trying to sway Brutus into joining the conspiracy, Brutus says, “If it be aught toward the general good,/ Set honour in one eye and death i’ the other” (1.2.85-86). This demonstrates how Brutus does anything, including suffer death, and oppose Caesar being crowned for the greater good of Rome. Their senses of loyalty also influence how they speak about and towards Caesar in private. Antony is loyal to Caesar, and speaks to him…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Consequences

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All the rest of the conspirators acted out of jealousy of great Caesar. Only he acted from honesty and for the general good.” Says…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this, Antony is showing the people that what Brutus and…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whenever he uses the words honorable, noble, or good to describe the men who murdered Caesar it is almost as though you can hear his tone of voice. Antony does not believe that a single conspirator is good. He knows this from the beginning. What he is truly implying is that the men are dishonorable Not shockingly, it takes awhile for the countrymen to catch his meaning.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is the one character in the entirety of the play who does intend to double-cross anyone, much like the seemingly trustworthy Mark Antony, and he does not have hidden reasons for engaging in the plot to murder Caesar, as Cassius does. Brutus simply wants the best for Rome as shown in Act I, Scene II on lines 163-175, “ That u-you do love me I am nothing jealous … Brutus rather be a villager…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rylee Sellitto Ms. Heaton RL 1 English 10 November 4th, 2015 Effectiveness From Logical and Emotional Appeal Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, Antony uses the stylistic choice of irony when the conspirators and Brutus were called honourable men. Everytime Antony described Brutus as “honourable” he would use an increasingly sarcastic tone, until the last time in the speech, it was felt as if the meaning was changed. The last time Antony calls Brutus honourable, the speech hugely impacts the crowd to changing the mindset of Brutus’s, which is that Caesar was killed for the better of Rome, to the mindset that Brutus and the rest of the conspirators are traitors. The use of irony converted the mood of the audience from accepting Caesar’s death, to feeling angry and in need to assassinate Caesar’s killers. Additionally, the use of irony in the speech advocates the theme of fire and blood, because Antony was trying to convey the message of assassinating Brutus and also, he was smearing Caesar’s blood among all the conspirators.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays