Dr. Zimbardo's Definition Of Evil Vs Human Nature

Improved Essays
In this world, there exist both good and evil, and they both coexist in every humankind genetic trait. Wherever we go, evil is present around us, and there is not a place that is safe from evil. My definitions of evil as sin, an act of rebellion against God, and an act of breaking God 's commandments. Dr. Zimbardo 's definitions of evil as an improper behavior or influence, an act of inhumanity or cruelty, and a desire to kill or to destroy. Both definitions of evil are similar to one another, because they both are part of our human nature, human instinct, and human reasoning.

First, I believe human nature is the characteristics, the feelings, and the behavior of every humankind. We all have human nature, and our human nature can be good and
…show more content…
Zimbardo 's gave a speech at TED Talk, and his topic was about “The Psychology of Evil.” First, Dr. Zimbardo 's believes that human nature is the core of every action and decisions that every humankind makes and acts upon. Dr. Zimbardo 's stated the following, "Psychologists have attempted to understand how and why individuals and groups who usually act humanely can sometimes act otherwise in certain circumstances." (Dr. Zimbardo). I have to agree with Dr. Zimbardo 's statement about understanding the human nature, and why we act and behave the way we are. Second, Dr. Zimbardo 's also believes that human instinct is a major factor in every humankind behavior and action. Dr. Zimbardo 's stated the following, “Yeah, people are the actors on the stage, but you have to be aware of what that situation is. Who are the cast of characters? What is the costume? Is there a stage director?" (Dr. Zimbardo). I have to agree with Dr. Zimbardo 's analogy, describing us humankind as actor in a play, and we all have our roles to play in and a script to follow. Third and finally, Dr. Zimbardo 's believes human reasoning play an important role in the way humankind behave and act. Dr. Zimbardo 's point out that every humankind has the ability to make decisions on their own, and they are responsible for their own choices that they make. I could not say it any better, and I definitely agree that is it our responsibility for our own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is core characteristics like feelings and behaviors that all humans share, but experience them through different perspectives. Early American authors like Thomas Jefferson, Olaudah Equiano, and Jonathan Edwards use rhetorical strategies to help convey their views on human nature in their writings throughout history. Equiano and Edwards have similar views, believing humans are naturally born evil. However, Jefferson believes in equality. These authors have different ways of conveying their message through figurative language, imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to show their contrasting views on human nature.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no distinct difference between being considered good and being considered evil. Every person falls somewhere in between the spectrum. An evil person would be considered someone who is immoral. An evil person puts his or her life above everyone else’s, and will stop at nothing to get what he or she wants.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1971, Philip Zimbardo made a huge impact on the field of Psychology. He changed the world of social psychology by taking it from a field focused on behavior being dispositional and transitioned it into a focus on social psychology in the terms of viewing behavior as situational. Gordon Allport, Fritz Heider, Harold Kelley and Bernard Weiner all helped set the stage for personality psychology and social psychology. Each of these individuals touched on the idea of behavior being dispositional until Solomon Asch, Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo introduced the idea that situations influence our actions. Dispositional behavior means that behavior is presented by an internal factor within us (e.g. the environment or culture we grow up in).…

    • 2169 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout daily life, there is a constant theme: good versus evil. This continuous comparison of the good to the evil is fundamentally within each person, whether it is known or not. People define others with these concepts by only knowing their basic qualities. This idea of good versus evil provides a distinct template in which discerns those who are characteristically good, and characteristically evil. Though, what draws this line, or, how exactly do humans define good and evil?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines human nature as “the nature of humans; especially : the fundamental dispositions and traits of humans”. Though this may be true in that of a more vague and superficial nature, not all humans are the same. So, how is human nature really defined and how are people reflected on by their overall nature? Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare and Sherman Alexie's The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian are two narratives combined to portray a strong message regarding human nature.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philip Zimbardo’s TEDTalk “The Psychology of Evil” discusses the line that separates good from evil, and how any human, placed under the right circumstances, can be swayed to either side of that line. Zimbardo begins his talk by discussing the century old question “What makes people go wrong?”. While some people may argue that humans are born either intrinsically good or evil, Zimbardo refutes this claim stating how, as a young boy growing up in the Bronx, he personally witnessed many of his friends cross the line from good to evil. Zimbardo calls this phenomenon the “Lucifer Effect” after the biblical story of the fallen angel Lucifer, once God’s favorite angel who falls from grace to eventually become Satan, epitome of all evil. Zimbardo’s…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The unfortunate reality of evil being an element of humanity is a hard pill for some to swallow, and can be an even more difficult concept to comprehend and breakdown philosophically. In a pluralistic world with many competing religions and worldviews, the concept of what is morally wrong can definitely be distorted to fit one’s lifestyle, or the norms of a particular culture. The presence of wickedness introduces the proverbial monkey wrench scenario for atheists, pantheists, agnostics, and to some extent Christians. A current example of evil that abounds in our world is the abuse of people by the hand and will of another, whether it be physical or emotional, which can precipitate the death of one’s body and/or spirit. Each belief system…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Psychology of Evil What does it mean to be evil? chances are when everyone is growing up ask at one point, what makes someone turn from good into evil? In the lecture we went over one layout of Milgram’s obedience study we went over during a lecture also could help explain what we now think evil is. In This study Milgram tested the obedience of people to see how far they would go on inflicting pain on someone else because someone of authority told them too, which made people wonder if obedience inferred evil.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Human Nature? This question has been asked throughout generations of philosophers and, yet, today Philosophers still do not have an exact answer. They have created multiple answers and continually have this debate as to which is correct. Throughout this philosophy course, we have learned a great deal about different philosophers’ opinions about what human nature is. That being said, we all have formed our own beliefs to which of these philosophers are creating a more persuasive argument.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The definition of evil is the “exercise of power” (“The Psychology of Evil”), according to psychologist Philip Zimbardo. In consonance with this definition, people execute an evil act “to intentionally harm people psychologically, to hurt people physically, to destroy people mortally, or ideas, and to commit crimes against humanity” (Zimbardo, “The Psychology of Evil”). Based on this, evil is committed with the intention to inflict harm on people and the environment. The incentive to perform evil acts, moreover, derives from the internal sentiments of an individual, the external environment encasing the individual, and the way that individual exerts these characteristics on others and on his or her surroundings. To begin with, people are inclined…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human nature is what comes naturally to human beings. In her novel, Parable of the Sower , Octavia Butler conveys that human nature is good even in situations where the world is in complete torment and chaos. Parable of the Sower argues…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brendan Hansen Mr. Williams Man’s Inhumanities 15 November 2017 The Science of Evil: Book Review INTRODUCTION: The book “The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Evil” by Simon Baron-Cohen was published recently in 2011 and provides and modern look on how we come about treating other human beings as objects. While this book was short coming in at around 250 pages, it still goes into much detail about how we come to commit cruel acts to other human beings. To summarize, Cohen argues that when we treat someone as an object, our empathy has been turned off, even going as far as making the argument that every cruel act is committed when an individual “turns off” their empathy, whether it be naturally or temporarily.…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The perception of what is defined as wrong varies as much as the definition of what is defined as evil. Philosophers have argued that evil is a distinct category from wrong while others have opposed this idea, stating that evil is an extreme wrong. Thus, in terms of an act being both wrong and evil come to the terms that evil is or can be an extreme wrong. I will begin by arguing that evil is not in a different category of wrong, but it is a degree of wrong. Two given factors have been claimed to be categorized as evil motives, these factors are the intention of harm and the act of wrongdoings both are in terms of human actions.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critique logic of Aristotle understands of the nature(s) of the human soul. According to Aristotle, human nature refers to the unique characteristics in a human being. Some of these characteristics include the way of thinking, feeling and acting. These characteristics are in human beings, and they occur naturally, independently of the influence of culture.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays