Evil And Omnipotence Analysis

Improved Essays
In his article “Evil and Omnipotence,” J.L. Mackie explores the various adequate and fallacious solutions to the “problem of evil,” a problem in which “God is omnipotent; God is wholly good; and yet evil exists” (p. 119). While Mackie discusses, analyzes, and criticizes many solutions, including “good cannot exist without evil” (p. 120) and “evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 122), my paper will solely focus on Mackie’s response to the fallacious solution that “evil is due to human free will” (p. 123), which begins “first I must query” on p. 124. This paper will formally extract, justify, critically evaluate, and engage with Mackie’s argument that existence of evil due to free will is erroneous. Mackie describes the free will …show more content…
He establishes that God’s limitless power should allow him to create beings who freely choose to do the good thing on every occasion, rather than beings who “sometimes prefer what is good and sometimes what is evil” (p. 124). Mackie proceeds to raises an important question: “can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control?” (p. 125). In the second premise, Mackie addresses God’s omnibenevolence. According to Mackie, if God was all loving or infinitely good, he would have wanted his creations to have the same nature and ultimately have done so, rather than creating humans whose freedom of choice sometimes leads to the creation of evil. In his third premise, Mackie asserts that God failed to go with “the obviously better possibility of making beings who would act freely but always go right” (p. 124). Because God either was not able to or simply chose not to creates beings who always choose to do the good thing while they act freely, Mackie concludes that God cannot be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent. Mackie’s argument is logically valid, but since I believe there to be several discrepancies with his logic and reasoning, I do not believe his conclusion to be sound. For example, people have varying definitions of what constitutes “good” and “evil” and people might be acting in a situation with the intention of doing the good thing, only to have that action result in evil. The critique I will …show more content…
For the definition of free will to reign true, human beings must make actions at their own discretion even if it is the wrong choice, which I have previously mentioned is an arbitrary measure. Once humans are created to always choose the good thing, the element of freedom is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He thought that not a lot of people would be willing to compromise and accept one of those beliefs however, because if someone did they would be left with the conclusion that their high and all mighty God was in fact un-worthy of worshipping. After Mackie comes up with his own take on the problem of evil, he agrees with a lot of the points the problem of evil considers, and comes to the conclusion that the problem of evil is both inconsistent and illogical. Mackie set out to disprove the common belief that God was in fact an “omnipotent and wholly god” by coming up with an argument. He breaks the problem down to three propositions.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, Mackie argues that God’s failure to do so suggests that God is no omnipotent and…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1) In this paper I argue that B.C. Johnson’s argument about the problem of evil and God when it comes to dependence is weak because his work field explanation fails. I will address this argument as the “Dependence Argument.” As you read you will notice the simple addition to the job field he addresses points out holes in his “Dependence Argument.” Johnson’s following argument, which I will call the “Moral Urgency Argument,” provides a similar attack to the theist explanation for God allowing evil, but by taking out the “Dependence Argument” Johnson’s argument becomes stronger.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    , pg. 102). If God were to be omniscient He should know when He creates a situation that it could lead to an unfortunate result. Because of this, Weirob believes that God is responsible for all actions. Weirob’s response to the argument about freedom includes a series of statements. First, God is omniscient.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the inception of humanity, the ongoing argument has reigned of whether man is basically evil or good. Accompanying this argument is the question: Does humanity have free will to act upon the universe as we please or are we fate’s puppet to do as fate deems worthy? In Loung Ung’s, First They Killed My Father and William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, both question and argument are laid to rest as both authors open the window to the human soul with the cruelty of humans and the differing opinions of good and evil. As philosopher Thomas Hobbes said, “Moral philosophy is nothing else but the science of what is good, and evil, in the conversation, and society of humanity.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I then will argue against his beliefs and explain in depth why I believe that his premise is wrong. First, I will focus on the first premise: “There exist instances of intense suffering which an omnipotent, omniscient being could have prevented without thereby…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discusses the Problem of Evil for theism, as well as defences theists have come up with against the problem. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: I shall argue that there is a possibility that God could have made different types of evils…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil and Omnipotence In Evil and Omnipotence, J.L. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. The fourth fallacious solution (S4), claims that moral evil is necessary in any world containing the overriding good of human freedom. In this paper, I will demonstrate: (I) S4; (II) Mackie’s objection of S4; (III) A primary benefit of Mackie’s argument; and (IV) Why Mackie’s criticism succeeds. (I) S4:…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why we give this up is because getting rid of God being omnibenevolent would diminish the idea of him existing. Not only that, you can’t get rid of evil because evil actually…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will talk about a theory known as Divine Command and the problem that hampers it which is known as the Euthypro Problem. To start off the paper, I will explain what the Divine Command Theory is and the main idea behind it. Next, I will talk about why this theory is so enticing to many people. After, I will reveal the problem with the theory called the Euthypro Problem, why it is titled Euthypro, and why it causes a problem within the theory. Later in the paper, I will discuss how the first part of the theory makes morality trivial and how it makes the concept of God always being good unimportant.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    If something is good because it is the will of God, then God is Good because this is his will. However, this is an empty tautology. We cannot recognise what it means to praise God for his goodness. It would suggest nothing other than God willing whatever he wants to. Adams objects to this, arguing that a statement such as 'God is Good ' should be understood metaphysically rather than morally.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A second criticism of God is based on natural evil, rather than moral evil. The definition of natural evil here is the existence of natural disasters, disease, and pain throughout the world. People claim that the universe should not contain these natural evils, and that they are indicators that the world is not perfect. Their question is “If God is perfect, why did he not create a perfect world”? Again, this is a valid argument that deserves an appropriate…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays