It is clear to see that Nowicke very easily gets sidetracked being that he spent half of his article explaining every detail of Hobbes’s life, Christopher Nolan’s work, and what existentialism is. This makes the article seem like it is being written without a clear view of what the end goal is. Nowicke does, however, allude to the movie in very clever ways like reminding the reader that the Joker is, “ ... a guy of simple taste, enjoying dynamite, gunpowder, and gasoline”, regrettably this only happens after all the excess information is presented. The lack of focus in the article is so evident that the explanations could be an article on their own. Losing focus really makes the author circle around his point but never really lets him make it and in the end makes his claim
It is clear to see that Nowicke very easily gets sidetracked being that he spent half of his article explaining every detail of Hobbes’s life, Christopher Nolan’s work, and what existentialism is. This makes the article seem like it is being written without a clear view of what the end goal is. Nowicke does, however, allude to the movie in very clever ways like reminding the reader that the Joker is, “ ... a guy of simple taste, enjoying dynamite, gunpowder, and gasoline”, regrettably this only happens after all the excess information is presented. The lack of focus in the article is so evident that the explanations could be an article on their own. Losing focus really makes the author circle around his point but never really lets him make it and in the end makes his claim