Everson Vs. Board Of Education Case Study

Improved Essays
This essay discusses the case of McCreamy County versus the American Civil Liberties Union in 2005 regarding the display of the Ten Commandments and whether it was in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This essay also discusses the separation between church and state from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson and its significance in the Establishment Clause. Another case discussed in this essay is the Everson versus Board of Education case that took place in 1947. This case is vital in understanding how the interpretation of the law has change over the years in regards to religion and the law. From the Everson case to the McCreamy County case there is a significant difference in court ruling. The final case discussed …show more content…
The issue was that two identical series of Ten Commandments displays erected by county officials in two Kentucky Courthouses. The first exhibit or display had a large gold frame copy of the Ten Commandments that was hung in 1999 in a busy hallway in each courthouse. The respondents, the American Civil Liberties Union brought a lawsuit against the county petitioners that said the displays were a violation of the Constitution prohibiting the establishment of religion. The county responded by passing identical decisions stating that the commandments were the precedent legal code for Kentucky Law, citing various religious references (consider putting the cases if case they would want to reference it). The Ten Commandments now had smaller patriotic and legal documents that highlighted religious references. The district court held a preliminary injunction that required them to be taken down because they found its purpose was solely to advance religion which is in violation of the Constitution (capitalize all Constitution’s). A new lawyer was hired and the county got a new display, a third one within the year. This one was entitled “The Foundations of American Law and Government” and it included equal sized copies of other documents such as the Bill of Rights, a picture of Lady Justice and the lyrics of the Star Spangled Banner. They now have a description saying how important they, how they are a huge influence of the formation of our country, and lastly seen in the Declaration of Independence (Double check if Declaration of Independence is capitalized). The District Court found that it violated the Establishment Clause. The Sixth Circuit Panel also affirmed the preliminary injunction on much the same ground they reaffirmed that the purpose of the displays was to advance religion and is not permitted under the Establishment

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment of the constitution is the right of free speech; throughout our history the first amendment has been interpreted in a number of ways. Despite this fact all Americans agree that this is one of our most important rights, and lays the foundation for our nations core beliefs. The first amendment is a short statement “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (1) Though it holds a great deal of power, it upholds strong personal values, and sets a precedent for the future of our country.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chirag N. Rao Political Science Essay#2, Topic= the Civil Rights and the Liberties Scenarios, Due= Thursday, February 19th, 2015 The hearing of an appeal to post Ten Commandments on the walls of a public or government building is an interesting case, whose relevance goes back to the famous phrase, namely, “Separation of Church and State”. Roots of this phrase can be traced all the way back to a letter written by Thomas Jefferson in January of 1802 to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut. Though the First Amendment clause against establishment of religion by law was to ensure that there was separation between religion and government, various courts to this day are still hearing cases and this remain an ongoing subject of interpretation and perspectives. I believe this is so because the various court decisions and legislation such as First Amendment, Lemon Test, Civil Rights and Liberties make it ambivalent between separation of religion and that of freedom to practice religion.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    group taking a stand against the merging of church and school, in the Engel vs. Vitale court case, causing an incensed populace of America. The Engel vs. Vitale case was a landmark in U.S Supreme Court cases, which caused a significant disturbance in America that ruled school-sponsored prayers to be in violation of one of the Amendments. The Supreme Court is known as the highest federal court in the United States, which also means that the Engel vs. Vitale case has been heard at least one other time before reaching the Supreme Court. In the Supreme Court case, Engel vs. Vitale, a parent sued their child’s school due to a New York State law that applied to public schools. In this case, they argued that the law, which required public schools to open each day with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the 1819 court case McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall argues that “the power to tax involves the power to destroy” (1), and upholds the constitutionality of religious tax exemptions on the basis that requiring churches to pay them would put their free expression of religion at risk. This argument falls apart when one considers that requiring churches to pay taxes like other organizations would bring about equal treatment of religious and nonreligious organizations, as neither are being shown favoritism. It is merely a fair system for taxing all institutions, rather than an attack on religious freedom, as is argued by dissenters of the idea. Rest assured, the government isn’t going to annihilate citizens’ freedom to practice their religious beliefs anytime soon, despite what some may…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jaffree Case Outline

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The case went to the District Court and the court decided the First Amendment establishment clause did not ban states from having a religion. Jaffree’s case challenge to the religious laws of Alabama was rejected. The Court of Appeals reversed the decision and the case went to the Supreme Court (O’Brien 791). 3. Question of the Court Does Alabama’s Statute allowing prayer and meditation violate…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This law did not provide money to any of the schools or support their religion directly. It assisted various parents to get their children safely to school, which did not violate the First Amendment (Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. U.S. Const. amend. I. Exemptions may be altered or repealed except those exempting real or personal property used exclusively for religious, educational or charitable purposes as defined by law and owned by any corporation or association organized exclusively for one or more of such purposes and not operating for profit. N.Y. Const.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They took their case to the district court, which decided that the town of Greece did not violate the First Amendment by starting their town meetings with a prayer. There was no intentional suppression or exclusion of non-christian…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Byerly 5 Ben Byerly Professor Sharifian 9/30/17 Govt 2305 Civil rights v. Civil Liberties Since the foundation of America, many people who lived in the new country struggled to obtain the basic civil rights and liberties that were necessary for a republic. Whether men were treated differently because of the color of their skin, gender, or ethnicity, the equality that was desired for Americans was not granted till the fourteenth amendment was passed. Unlike civil rights, civil liberties are constantly changing as terms are defined and the supreme court determines the correct ruling on cases.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling was such that state government cannot infringe on our freedom of speech. A third example of the Supreme Court defending our rights was in the case of Engel V. Vitale. The issue concerned the use of the “Regent’s Prayer” in New York public schools. In this case the Supreme Court ruled that it is no business of the government to compose official prayers for any group of American people to recite(Shelley, Schmidt, & Bardes,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Scopes Case Study

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Parties Involved in the Case The parties involved in the case were John Scopes, Clarence Darrow, William Jennings Bryan, and John Raulston (Linder, 2008). John Scopes was a young high school biology who was found to be guilty of violation. Clarence Darrow was a successful lawyer who defended scopes (Linder, 2008).…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    For example, the Court made two different rulings on two identical Ten Commandment cases in the same year. In McCreary County v. ACLU, the Court rejected a display of the commandments in a Kentucky courthouse because it did not have a secular purpose. In Van Orden v. Peny, the Court granted the state of Texas the ability to display the commandments on public capitol grounds because of its importance in U.S. history. In the dissent in McCreary Justice Scalia argued the First Amendment granted the government the ability to erect such monuments as the Ten Commandments wherever the government wished because a majority of the population is monotheistic, and “cannot be reasonably understood as a government endorsement of a particular religious viewpoint”. Scalia continued by stating, “I doubt most religious adherents are even aware there are competing versions with doctrinal consequences (I certainly was not).…

    • 2108 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 18th century Virginia, religion was a big topic and widely discussed. People argued, fought, and even died over the discussion. Going to church was also a big deal in this society. Every citizen was required to attend a service at least once a week and were punishable by law if they did not. In addition to this law, it is necessary to mention that the Church of England was the dominate church in colonial Virginia.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling by the Supreme Court in the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman states that to stay within the scope of constitutionality any governmental interference with religion must not inhibit nor advocate for religion…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays