Evaluate The Effectiveness Of A Semi-Presidential System

Great Essays
Industrialized democratic states have forged from colonial systems and traditional monarchies that now have evolved into a new system to fit the present majority states. Across European states, there are constitutional accepted guidelines approved by the Legislative to permit the Executive to exercise some form of powers in regards to the policy process. Modern democratic states now run under a parliamentary or presidential system in which governing vary in the division of power and in the way policies are process and implemented. Although traditional long standing parliamentary systems like Great Britain have proven to have an exceptional executive-legislative relation one in which is for the betterment of their state, there are other modern democracies like France, who is a semi-presidential state that confer their own interrelations, while managing to impact their state with the same magnitude as a parliamentary state. By examining closely of the relationships of these two systems, one can see the difference of impact and efficiency in policy making when voting powers are tied to different positions. In a …show more content…
One cannot say which is more triumphant than the other, however it is evident that Great Britain’s encouragement to receive any criticism towards its government creates an open environment in which in theory should not create any distrust between state and citizen and therefore can make the process of legislation to produce quickly with ease. France is still making strides to devolve more power to the lower levels, but it seems now that the role of the Prime Minister is to balance and maintain the assurance of both the executive and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bostonistan Case Study

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Since these members of state cabinets can be removed at any time, they are able to check the power of the state without concern of re-election. While, Bostonistan’s may be skeptical of a body of government only indirectly elected by the people its role of revisiting and slowing down the legislative processes emphasizes accountability and putting high value on counteracting the temptation of majoritarianism which diminishes and potentially destroys democracy. To illustrate its effectiveness, over the last half century Germany has not encountered a manufactured…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On a spectrum of authoritarian and democratic states, Senegal is further towards the latter. According to Freedom house, Senegal has a ranking of two out of seven in both political liberties and civil rights. (1) Senegal currently has a presidential republic system of government that is working for the country. (2) This system of government is successful in Senegal. This is evident by multiple peaceful transitions of power, example and aid given to surrounding countries, and the ability of the government to hold referendums meant to improve the political system there.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different types of governments in history. When you compare a Constitutional Monarchy and a Democratic Presidency, it can be clear that the two are very different but alike. For the Democratic Party, the people hold its’ supreme power. For example, the United States falls under the Democratic Presidency. The U.S. is broken up into different levels, and three branches concluded of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two-party system still works to an extent, though it may work people are not represented fairly by agreeable candidates. This system is not effective in any aspect as it is a guaranteed win for only two prospective candidates rather than the collective of running candidates. The two-party system is not fair, people should be able to vote for who they want not the other way around. This idea creates the perfect storm for gerrymandering and many other unfair political processes. Furthermore this system does not represent the people and it does not help that our vote does not count in any way shape or form.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pm Roles

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since outmoded times, the Prime Minister’s (PM’s) roles have largely remained unchanged but their manners of execution have been influenced more by practical circumstances than the materiality of the roles themselves. The conventional view of the PM as being ‘primus inter pares’ seems quite anachronistic considering the apparent increase in PMs’ power. Nonetheless, the tenability of this view will be determined in the analysis of the PM’s and the Cabinet’s roles and their relationship before the second question is addressed. Due to the absence of statutory authority governing the PM’s roles, PMs themselves have to maximize their roles and one of such roles is the power of patronage.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

     In a presidential government, the president can choose members of the executive, the members of government who implement laws, from the general public without the need of choosing those members from the legislature. For example, the president can choose anyone from his/her memory to be a defence minister. On the other hand, in a parliamentary government, the prime minster, the head of government, must have to choose members of the executive from parliament. Thus, members of the executive are elected members of parliament. Additionally, in a parliamentary government, the Supreme Court can overturn decisions made by congress, if they conflict with other laws or generally the constitution.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    France is one of the European countries that has a democratic government. In other words, it means that France is ruled by a Constitution that they created “based on the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen“ (“Consitutional Limits..”). This country is different than other countries because it has both a President and a prime minister who run the country (“The France Political..”). They also have some differences and similarities of government from the others and that what helps them to be together as a country today. The participation of France’s government is a democracy.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lisbon Treaty

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The European Union has always been recognized as suffering from democratic deficit and the standard of the European Union has been a controversial issue since the early 1990s. Therefore, Lisbon Treaty was lately implemented in order to improve the Union’s democracy. However, it is arguable that whether the Lisbon Treaty is effective enough to tackle the problem of democracy, which will be discussed in the following. In this essay, I will first define what is ‘democratic deficit’ and show the historical development of Lisbon Treaty, hence talking about the significant changes and problems of it.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has often been said that the European Union suffers from a democratic deficit. This notion derives from the fact that prior to 1979, none of the EU institutions had directly elected members and therefore there was no democratic accountability to the citizens of the EU. It is also regularly asserted that the legislative powers at EU level are confined and dominated by executive actors, namely the Council of Ministers and the ‘unelected bureaucrats’ in the European Commission. However, this view misunderstands how the EU decision making and legislative process now operates.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral systems provide a set of rules which must be followed for a vote to be considered valid. It decides how votes are cast, counted, and translated into legislative seats and is an important component of how political power is allocated in a democracy. It is rare to find a democracy that does not divide their populations to form electoral boundaries that are allocated a certain number of legislative seats. There are two broad forms of electoral systems that are being used in liberal democracies today. The first is made up of plurality and majority systems, often called Single-Member District (SMD) systems and the second is Proportional Representation (PR).…

    • 1256 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, his room for movement on various policies, for example, depends on his party’s majority in the House of Commons. The larger the majority, the more easily the PM and the government can get through policies and legislation, without the interference of any branches such as in the U.S. Therefore, if the Prime Minister has a large majority, he or she can make a significant change in Britain during their time in power (Ndla.no). In summary, both nations a\have two chambers, however the U.S.’s political system can give the President more limited power than the PM’s in…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Abstract The European Union of today is the result of a process that began over half a century ago with the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community. From that time, a durable peace has existed in the European continent for about 70 years. As we can see from the remarkable successes of the process of European integration today is significantly affected by the legislative procedures that apply to different policy fields. In fact, there were some thorny issues and crises took place with various reasons, mainly were intergovernmental issues, in the way of integration.…

    • 2859 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline the principal dimensions of difference between feudal, absolutist, and modern states. The state has gone through multiple transformations throughout world history. The states developed originally from the feudal state to the absolutist state, and finally to the modern state. Each of these states have possessed their own unique characteristics which differ them from one another. The first distinguished state, known as the feudal state, was a hierarchical system in which the king owned all of the land that he then leased to his lords.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    11 Dec. 2016. Robert Elgie Professor, Head Professor (2005) From Linz to Tsebelis: three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? , Democratization, 12:1, 106-122, DOI: 10.1080/1351034042000317989 Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Mark S. Bonchek. Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is a summation of the fact that there is very broad overlap between the legislative and the executive in the UK constitution, as the two powers are closely entwined, often exercised by the same bodies. For instance, Government ministers are members of the executive who exercise a legislative function in Parliament and also when they make delegated legislation. The Prime Minister is a Member of Parliament and occupies a seat in the House of Commons, with a majority of his peers, thus the executive has a powerful influence in the legislative branch. From this, it is evident that a pure separation of powers is not an explicit feature of the UK constitution, and Walter Bagehot’s claim that there is a “nearly complete fusion, of the executive and legislative powers” holds true. However this should not mean that the UK constitution is inadequate and allows for tyrannical rule.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays