techniques were mentioned by Franks and Hoffmann referencing the comparison of clines at different
geographical locations.20 Quintero and Weins used similar clines, but compared across geological time and
environmental conditions. They noted that there may be inaccuracies that skew the results, as fossil records are
not precise. However, deviations from the estimated rates were estimated to account for a 10-fold
fluctuation from the results. This novel approach has provided some insight into past rates of evolution,
however, it does not account for what mechanisms lead to adaptation and evolution in the divergent species.
There are various models to choose from when assessing evolution in species, populations, or
organisms. Models are …show more content…
The usage of generalized and standard measures would be
beneficial in predicting both model and non-model species.22 Consistency would allow for better comparison
between species, and adjustment to sampling techniques to increase efficiency and accuracy.
The reviewed literature show examples of the techniques, specific traits, and/or conditions used to
evaluate evolutionary response to climate change. Many models are still in their infancy, outdated, or lack
proven efficacy. There are also no agreed upon parameters or framework by which to insure consistency in
research.23 It has become apparent scientists opt for the model that suits their field of study more precisely.
Given there are multiple factors that affect evolution, placing focus one aspect is not productive. Hoffmann and
Franks, both geneticist, included all sources of adaptation though more attention was placed on genes.24 When
Hoffmann published with Sgrò, a biologist, phenotypic plasticity was considered a more reasonable and
immediate mechanism of adaptability.25 It is for this reason that it may be beneficial to combine scientists
geographical locations.20 Quintero and Weins used similar clines, but compared across geological time and
environmental conditions. They noted that there may be inaccuracies that skew the results, as fossil records are
not precise. However, deviations from the estimated rates were estimated to account for a 10-fold
fluctuation from the results. This novel approach has provided some insight into past rates of evolution,
however, it does not account for what mechanisms lead to adaptation and evolution in the divergent species.
There are various models to choose from when assessing evolution in species, populations, or
organisms. Models are …show more content…
The usage of generalized and standard measures would be
beneficial in predicting both model and non-model species.22 Consistency would allow for better comparison
between species, and adjustment to sampling techniques to increase efficiency and accuracy.
The reviewed literature show examples of the techniques, specific traits, and/or conditions used to
evaluate evolutionary response to climate change. Many models are still in their infancy, outdated, or lack
proven efficacy. There are also no agreed upon parameters or framework by which to insure consistency in
research.23 It has become apparent scientists opt for the model that suits their field of study more precisely.
Given there are multiple factors that affect evolution, placing focus one aspect is not productive. Hoffmann and
Franks, both geneticist, included all sources of adaptation though more attention was placed on genes.24 When
Hoffmann published with Sgrò, a biologist, phenotypic plasticity was considered a more reasonable and
immediate mechanism of adaptability.25 It is for this reason that it may be beneficial to combine scientists