Euthyphro's Theory Vs Divine Command Theory

Improved Essays
Divine Command Theory is a normative theory that states we should follow the will of god. A similar variation to Euthyphro’s question to Socrates is; does god commands what is right because it is right, or God commands what is right? This question can be quite confusing, and can be difficult to explain which of the two corresponds with Divine Command Theory. After carefully analyzing both scenarios, it can be concluded that a Divine Command Theorist cannot choose one. Therefore, let’s examine both options give reasons of why this situation can be difficult to comprehend. The first part of the question can be examined more reasonably and can give a solid reason why this can be a better option. If God commands what is right because it is right, …show more content…
However, there are also problems with this option, because it creates another issue to the matter. One way to look at the error is that God is following something, even though it is God’s free will, does not give a valid reason why somebody should worship God. This option just states a reason to not collide with the second option. It can be viewed as if right is above God, and he just commands things that is right. In a way it hints why this option is not 100% correct to follow the will of God, if God is not viewed as top priority. However, just for the reason that God has free independent will, can be convincing at a certain degree, but not the option to go for a theorist. The other option it is right, because commands it, is implying that God can command anything can be viewed right at any situation given. Unlike the previous option where the end result would turn out correctly, this option contradicts it. Involving situations where at times can be viewed wrong to society, but right to God. For example, one of the “Ten Commandments” is that people are forbidden to kill, because God commands that it is right not to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lest we forget, we are not the supreme masters of our fate. Only God is sovereign. He has created a moral universe in which the law of cause-and-effect is a certainty. Morality includes a person’s standard of conduct or daily practice.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays
    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3. Socrates is at court because he is under indictment by a man named Meletus for corrupting the young and for not believing in the the gods that the city believes in. 5. Euthyphro's family is angry that he is prosecuting his father for murder on behalf of a murder that his father hasn't done. They also think that is impious for a son to prosecute his father for murder.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth and Fifth of Euthyphro's Definitions to Piety In the fourth definition of Euthyphro in Plato's dialogue of “Euthyphro”, he describes piety is as a “servants show to their master” (Plato 71). meaning the one should follow the god's ways, like in a way in how a priest would follow the words of the gods in what could be good or evil. Furthermore, Euthyphro could be suggesting that attending to gods is piety (good), meaning doing things that would please the gods would be seeing as goods or just. While not attending to the gods would be seen as impiety to the gods, meaning doing things that the gods would not like would seeing as an evil deed.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many opponents of the Divine Command Theory but very few have plausible arguments. Bertrand Russell argues that if piety is because of God’s authorization, then to God “there is no difference between right and wrong” and because of this, Russell says it cannot be said that God is good (Russell 12). He also says that in order to say that God is good, one must agree that morality and immorality have meaning separate from God’s authorization because “God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them” (12). One valid point Russell brings up is that to assume God is good would mean that He is unable to command anything that is evil. This argument allows that God can haphazardly change whether an action is moral or not.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This idea of divine command is interpreted and applied differently in various…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hidden Worldview Analysis

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My heart will decide what is right and wrong not a higher power or someone else. I determine what is considered valuable. If I want something I simply get it. Without thinking of the harm done to others in the process. I am my own God.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being A Paramedic

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would it be right for him to commit immoral acts and for us not to? This also gives unrighteous justice to people who commit crimes in the name of God. If God gave us morality, religious choices would be clearer. For example, topics like gay marriage and abortion are commonly debated upon.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a worshipper, “sometimes [s]he even feels dominated by a moral power that is larger than [s]he is, for which he is merely the interpreter” (Durkheim 158). Since the person feels subjected by the authoritative figure, they are willing to do anything to receive the god’s approval which can lead to rash moral…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the Rachels examine The Theory of Natural Law, which stipulates the viewpoint that the world has a rational order, with values and purposes built into its very nature. Another main point is whether there are distinctively religious positions on major moral issues that Christians must accept. In summary, Rachels claims that Divine Command Theory is the solution to the objectivity problem of ethics because ethics isn’t solely a matter of personal feeling rather, it is God’s will.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays