Euthanasia Is The Right Choice In John Steinbeck's 'Of Mice And Men'

Improved Essays
Euthanasia is the Right Choice
“They had been begging for months to die” (Gross). In the story “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck a main character by the name of George, has to face a difficult decision after his best friend, Lennie, murdered the wife of another character, Curley. George has to quickly decide if he wants Lennie to continue living and let him get killed in whichever way Curley would like to when he finds them or would he kill him in a peaceful/fast way. The story clearly shows that mercy killing, which is the killing of a person or animal from an incurable and painful disease, it's a righteous thing to do to show kindness to a needed loved one.
After Lennie's Aunt Clara died, George felt responsible for Lennie because he had nobody left, so when George decides to kill Lennie the way he wants, he considers it as taking good care of him.
…show more content…
The following quote shows that mercy killing is unacceptable, “Giving doctors the right, in law, to cause the death of their patients will never be safe and no amount of so-called "safeguards" will protect those who live with depression or abuse” (Schadenberg). In my point of view, this statement is wrong because it is unthoughtful to make people suffer endlessly. “I oughtta of shot that dog myself, George. I shouldn’t oughtta of let no stranger shoot my dog” (Steinbeck 61). This proves that euthanasia is the right thing to do because the dog was suffering.
When a loved one is in need, all you want for them is to get better. Euthanasia allowed this to take the incurable pain away from a loved one. In Of Mice and Men George kills Lennie because it shows he cares enough about him and he doesn't want him to die in a painful way. Mercy killing, whether you believe it is the right thing to do or not, it should be an option to those who do believe in it. It avoids the pain and suffering and allows a calm, peaceful

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Second of all, Lennie became a big danger for himself and for the society, everything that Lennie was touching he finished by killing, like his puppy, Curley wife’s esc., George know that Lennie was unproductive and he couldn’t protect Lennie for all his trouble that he would start in the future so George decide to kill Lennie without…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, that the men that they were surrounded with in that time could have also influenced George to make that decision. They did the same to Candy’s dog and weren’t considerate to Candy and George maybe could have thought that eventually they would do the same with Lennie and he saw how Candy regretted not being the one to kill his closest friend so George did it before anyone could even think about it. I think that Lennie was George’s only family and now he is alone and he won’t know what to do without someone to have to support. I believe George made the wrong…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the end of the book, Of Mice and Men, George (the smarter one) kills Lennie, a man that is mentally challenged. The reason for it is because Lennie accidentally killed a man named Curly’s wife. So Curly is coming after Lennie to torture and kill him. So George killed Lennie to make him not suffer. George did the right thing killing Lennie.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After Lennie ends up killing a woman at the ranch that they are working on, George has to decide whether the right choice would be to put Lennie out of his misery so that Curley doesn’t get a hold of him. George makes the right decision in killing Lennie because Lennie would’ve continued to do bad things no matter…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are really many reasons why George kills Lennie. It is often explained that this is a "mercy killing." George supposedly wants to save Lennie from the lynch mob, who will make his death as painful as possible, whereas George knows how to kill him instantly and painlessly with Carlson's Luger because Carlson has demonstrated how to do this with Candy's dog. But this explanation is an oversimplification. George has realized that Lennie is becoming a menace to society.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These words stuck with George and he knew that he had to kill Lennie because he does not want to make the same mistake Candy did. George kills Lennie out of love and to save him from a hate-filled death. In conclusion, George had no other option but to shoot Lennie. Saving someone from suffering and a more painful death.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He will often forget things, accidentally kill animals because of his strength, and become upset easily. This ends up placing him into a severe dilemma and he ends up murdering a man’s wife. George chooses to end Lennie’s life so he would not have to suffer later on; therefore, putting Lennie out of his misery was the optimum choice for everyone involved. George killed Lennie purely out of love, compassion, and to save him from being locked up in jail or shot by Curley.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, giving a nationwide go-ahead for doctors to legally end their patient’s lives actually halved the number of unwanted deaths. April 29th 2017 Brannya Bechthold Euthanasia and Why it Should be Legalized Euthanasia is when a qualified Physician, painlessly kills a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. People who are suffering from such diseases (i.e Guillain Barre syndrome) do not deserve to have this pain inflicted on them. Instead of having to sit and suffer, bedridden for the rest of their lives, those patients should have the option to decide if they could have a physician assist them in suicide.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Best Friends Until the End Imagine having to kill your best friend. In Of Mice and Men, George made a hard decision which was if he should kill his best friend, Lennie. George killing Lennie was justified because had to think about Lennie’s life ahead if he didn 't make this choice. George making this choice was right because Lennie had unknowingly brought a threat among people, Lennie had died much quicker and painless, and Lennie was basically George’s responsibility.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as doctor assisted suicide, and whether or not if it should be legalized is a very controversial. Euthanasia essentially is permission for doctors to end the lives of terminally ill people to end that pain. It being a very debatable topic some may argue that if there is no positive signs in sight then rather the patient suffer; end it. On the other hand is is arguable that life is valuable so live it through completely, and doctors being given the option of ending live devalues life. Personally, I believe under the right circumstances euthanasia is acceptable, especially if the victim of the suffering is asking to put an end to it as well.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it true that people think it’s not morally right to kill a person, but that it’s morally acceptable to let them die? James Rachels, in “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” argues that there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He believes that if passive euthanasia is permissible, then active euthanasia should also be. In medical ethics, the distinction between both euthanasias are highly controversial, yet passive euthanasia is accepted and practiced by a majority of doctors. Despite critical conditions to one’s medical case, the majority of people believe active killing is morally worse than letting one die.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays