Should Terminal Illnesses, Provide Assisted Suicide?

Many of us are treated well and healthy as we go to the hospital. We go to the hospital to be healed or have a physical exam, but there a lot of terminal illnesses like cancer, HIV, Ebola and other more that can’t be healed. There are a lot of people wanted to have assisted suicide, or also known as euthanasia. Euthanasia is the planned killing by act or error of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit, and can be voluntary or non-voluntary. Should terminal illnesses, provide assisted suicide? Giving assisted suicide to patients, give comfort and peace of knowing they have control of their body, but many people believe that only God has the right to end human life.
Several religious groups are saying that assisted suicide or …show more content…
Non-Religions group ague for banning voluntary euthanasia. Euthanasia is a way of killing and this is probably to be a crime. Harold Donnelly killed his brother Matthew Donnelly because Matthew is suffering from skin cancer, which has spared over his body, Matthew has lost his nose, left hand and two fingers on his right hand and has no chance to get cure. Matthew wanted to die, so Matthew told Harold to shoot him. Harold has a 0.30 pistol that killed his brother and he is tried for murder by killing his own brother (Assisted Suicide: A Right or a Wrong?). This has explain that many people with cancer or other terminally illness wanted to die because they are tried for fighting for their life and just wanted to give up and to those who help will be tried for murder even though they don’t want to do it. There are many rational, non-religious argument for banning "voluntary euthanasia (Non-Religious Arguments against 'Voluntary Euthanasia '). Any method of suicide is shocking for the people left behind who love the person who has obvious took their life. This has shown what a great impact is has left the family to those committed suicide. It give a massive mark to them, how that person has no effort to fight for their life and just wanted to die. Euthanasia would produce huge social pressures on volunteering euthanasia due to causing much stress and suffering. The non-religious point of view display …show more content…
The Bible said that God is the one who give use life and he is the only person to end one. Likewise, there will be a mercury, if they continue to fight for their life, furthermore voluntary euthanasia is trialed for crime due to killing someone life and faith. This it give a massive impact to the family, by not giving hope to their self to live and just wanted to die. The of the relationship of human life of many different levels of thought from the earlier stages and finishing to the present day, that even though individual suffering might can be dreadful, that euthanasia should be limited in the interest of not committing human mistakes in the name of the state and having such multiply to the whole. Such open minded ideals, even if seen in large structure in the means of those who perceive such as their true feelings and standards are better not to combined as an individual right for the benefit of not injuring the many. The Euthanasia debate is one of the biggest arguments, both for and against, but the argument for against is stronger than those who support the argument for euthanasia. This argument will probably not be solved for many years and even then a lot people will be irritated with the result that it’s made. Do you support