Euthanasia Be Considered A Human Right Essay

Improved Essays
Thousands of people living today aren’t exactly “living” they are either terminally ill or suffering in misery. There is a way to end their suffering, however, and it is known physician-assisted suicide or in medical terms, Euthanasia. Some people believe that these sick patients deserve the right to decide when to end their lives since they are not living to the fullest while others say that it disturbs the religious values of God. Sometimes religion just needs to be held out of medical procedures such as these in order to end the suffering of ill people. Euthanasia should be considered a human right. No one other than yourself or your family should be able to decide whether you live a life filled with suffering or end your life peacefully. …show more content…
It is illegal to kill one another, but is it legal to have a person lay in a hospital bed for months just to wait and die of an incurable disease? All humans deserve a right to their own lives. The greek Hippocratic Oath first mentions the idea of euthanasia. The original oath states "To please no one will I prescribe a deadly drug nor give advice which may cause his death"(Historical Timeline History of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide). When no relief is offered to the patients and people who are at death 's door, the greeks believed helping the person end their lives and go peacefully is the right thing to do. As a representative of the National Institutes of Health once said, “As long as I maintain this Oath faithfully and without corruption, may it be granted to me to partake of life fully and the practice of my art, gaining the respect of all men for all time. However, should I transgress this Oath and violate it, may the opposite be my fate." (National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2008). This meaning that all physicians have the power and ability to treat a patient with every possible way they can to make them better and if they chose to do something that is against this oath’s wording, such as killing them, they will be violating what they …show more content…
Markel says, “There are about 16,000 men and women who are eager to take possession of their medical degrees.” (Markel, Howard I Swear By Apollo. 2004, 13, May). This means that most doctors who are licensed do not fully obey the rules of this oath since an ancient physician created it a very long time ago and those medical issues back then were not the same as they are today. Now, there are incurable types of diseases presented to the human population that causes long, painful deaths for those affected. Sometimes people need to disregard the oath and do what they know is best for the person they are treating in order to fulfill their human rights and respected needs.This is why it is so controversial because people take into consideration for their personal morals, religion, or controversy surrounding the problems regardless if they are affected by the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In the original Hippocratic Oath, written in 400 B.C.E., physicians were made to swear that they would “neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will [they] make a suggestion to this effect.” While many physicians to this day fiercely agree with this statement, it would be unreasonable not to reconsider and evaluate a centuries-old perception on physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) calls for physicians to prescribe lethal medication to patients with terminal illnesses who desire to end their lives. Although the debate over the legalization and morality of PAS is thousands of years old, in the past fifty years the issue has been put under the spotlight with the legalization of the practice in countries…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first dilemma this situation would have to doctors, is the contraction of the American Medical Association code of ethics and policies. Doctors under oath are required to protect lives and to gain public confidence in preserving life where hopes permits but not to take life. This situation strictly put doctors in an awkward situation. Instead of them to adhering and remain obligated to their ethical conducts, which is against and prohibits involvement of capital punishment, the government is forcing them kill. Also it is wrong to put doctors with crisis of their conscience.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physicians are trained and educated to help save lives and to help cure illnesses, when asked to take the life away from a patient, it is asking the physician to do the opposite of what their profession is meant to…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A common moral argument against Physician Assisted Suicide is that it disobeys the Hippocratic Oath: the set of moral guidelines for any doctor or administrator of medicine. The section which is specifically referenced by such opponents is “Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course” (INSERT CITATION). However, the Hippocratic Oath (the original version, in particular) fails to provide an effective basis for opposing PAS because it is irrelevant to modern medicine. One…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Terminally ill patients are already dying-- suffering their way through their end of time and prolonging their agony. They should have the right to end their lives peacefully, so they can stop their suffering and end their life the way they wanted to. People’s choices are up to them, not us. We can’t control what goes on in life so why should we judge a person who wants to end their live on good terms. Personal beliefs, religious beliefs, and opinions all stop Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)from being legal in many countries and states.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of killing someone painlessly, usually by giving them a lethal dose of medication. This practice is banned in almost all of the states since it is seen as morally wrong. In addition, physicians have lived by the Hippocratic Oath for more than two-thousand years. The code clearly states a physician’s role as a healer and that under no circumstances should they administer deadly medicine; euthanasia goes directly against the Hippocratic Oath…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Hippocratic Oath, although the giving of deadly medicine to anyone who asks is prohibited, the role of a physician is to provide the best treatment for the patient. Therefore, in some cases, hastening death will be the best treatment (Citation). They also claim euthanasia is opposite to the laws of humanity, but they are neglecting the laws of nature, which were established long before mankind. Protecting from death or prolonging our lives is against nature. It is the act of breaking the balance of nature (Source log 11-Citation).…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Seeing a loved one enduring excruciating agony due to an illness or medical condition can be unquestionably painful, especially terminal illnesses. By legalizing the physician-assisted suicide it gives the person enduring pain, as well as the family, another choice to help their loved one not suffer. However, only five states in the U.S. passed legislation for legalized physician-assisted suicide. This particular procedure differs in each state; however, it mainly involves a prescription from a licensed doctor approved by the state in which the patient legally resides. In the states that passed the “Death with Dignity Act”, such as Oregon, “The law requires the patient to be: 1) 18 years of age or older, 2) a resident of Oregon, 3) capable…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hippocratic Oath

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Do patients with terminal illness patients have the right to die? The oath that doctors make known as the “Hippocratic Oath” is an oath that has been used by physicians for the code of ethics is: “I will follow that method of treatment, which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such counsel.” (US Legal, 2004-2016) This is an oath the physicians take that goes against everything an assisted suicide is.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legalize Euthanasia Essay

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are one in the same when it comes to the controversial. Euthanasia allows a physician and the patient to choose the option to control the patient’s right to live or die. There are arguments supporting the idea that such an act would be in violation of the Hippocratic Oath that all physicians swear on, specifically the theme that they would “do no harm”. Furthermore, arguments can be made regarding the physician’s authority and role as a medical profession being compromised and disregarded as result of overwhelming patient authority. In an interview titled, “Euthanasia Sets Sail,” Philip Nitschke counters arguments made on the basis that legalizing euthanasia or physician assisted suicide and requiring…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide is one of the most controversial ethics topics in society today. Many believe that physician assisted suicide should be legalized across the U.S because of the positive impact it could have on those with terminal illness who want to avoid prolonged suffering in hospice care. Suicide with a medical professionals assistance is also justifiable as a person 's right because it in no way affects or endangers another person 's rights. If physician assisted suicide is legal for those who are mentally competent it could relieve pain for not only the person but their loved ones. On the other hand, it becomes debatable when taken into terms of religious and moral beliefs, many disagree with those who believe that it…

    • 1306 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, when it is explicit, it is often affirmative in those areas that are either 1) obsolete or 2) do not belong in a general code for physicians because it is not universally agreed upon. Let’s start by looking at what the Oath mentions directly. When taken literally it states that a physician must give money to his teacher when it is needed and must withhold medical knowledge to those who are not students. These are no longer obligations that physicians must fulfill today, making them obsolete commitments. Also, when taken literally, without the historical context that Sokol provided, it appears the Oath makes a statement forbidding abortions, surgery by all physicians, and euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With great power comes great responsibility. In places such as Oregon and Switzerland, strict rules are set into place to prevent the targeting of the vulnerable. For example, in Oregon one must be at least 18 years of age, a resident of the state and one must be competent and in the right state of mind to be eligible to be euthanized (Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act—2013). Other guidelines that have been set into place include these well-defined circumstances: that the illness be incurable, suffering is considered unbearable, other options be thoroughly explored. If these guidelines are not followed, the doctor could face up to 12 year in prison.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as death with honor or dignity is used to help patients who are suffering from a disease that cannot be cured. When doctors see no hope of cure in a patient’s health, the treatment becomes too painful euthanasia helps, in euthanasia doctors can drug the patient suffering with lethal and put them to sleep.. It is every human’s natural right to decide whether they wish to live or die, especially in the situation where there is no hope for cure. Legalizing Euthanasia can put an end to miserable sufferings of patients in need. It is a way to reduce further treatments that do not guarantee cure and rather cause more pain to the patient.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays