Essay on Euthanasia And The American Medical Association

907 Words Jun 18th, 2015 4 Pages
“No human with a spark of pity would let a living thing suffer so.” Relative to the moral question and permissibility of the distinctions and limitations of euthanasia, Rachels imposes the notion that if an action or social policy decreases the level of misery within society from patients who are suffering, then this should stand as an appropriate probable cause to endorse such a policy. Rachels presumes that euthanasia fulfills this particular mandate and therefore, designated that discerning the authenticity of euthanasia was determined on the basis of whether an action promotes the best interests of everyone involved without violating or imposing on any additional rights. However, the standards of euthanasia must be further evaluated in efforts to clarify the questionable comparative legality concerning the deliberate and voluntary actions committed or the lack of in correspondence to the Conventional Doctrine on Euthanasia instituted by the American Medical Association. With regards to questions concerning the contiguity on the conversation of euthanasia and assisted suicide, is the right to die a human right and how can political and professional agencies neglect an individual who has been suffering immeasurably from vocalizing his desire to die with dignity? The etymology of euthanasia serves to indicate that it is a Greek word meaning “good death.” The primary distinction between active and passive euthanasia entails a deliberate action to cause a patient to die…

Related Documents