Euthanasia Should Be Legalized Essay

Improved Essays
Euthanasia is intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering of a person who is beyond the point of recovery (Quill 8). A form of euthanasia, known as Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is when a physician provides information and or medication to help the patient end their own life (Lachman 1). A patient should have the right to control the circumstances of their own death and determine how much pain and suffering is enough (Quill 7). In the Bill of Rights of patients, it is a person’s right to be treated for illness and refuse treatment (connect us 2). The criteria of being able to qualify for this type of treatment is very strict. Usually, the patients involved are very ill with a life threatening disease (Wilson 3). From the …show more content…
This is the data the survey came up with. 13 out of the 14 patients agreed that PAS should be allowed (Wilson 3). 60% said they would use PAS immediately if it was legalized (Wilson 3). 43% said they believe it is their right to choose. They also asked the patients why they thought PAS should be legalized (Wilson 3). 43% also said they would consider PAS for pain (Wilson 3). 35% said because of the diminished quality of life that comes with terminal diseases (Wilson 3). 24% said because of the suffering that they experience (Wilson 3). 24% said because of the hopeless situations that can come with terminal illness (Wilson 3). 18% said because the mental symptoms are enough to make them consider PAS (Wilson 3). 14% believe that the burden it puts on their loved ones is unnecessary and could be solved by PAS (Wilson 3). 8% said the knowledge of their disease and the experience that they know they will face, is enough to want to use PAS to save them the trouble of going through the trouble (Wilson …show more content…
Drugs for PAS cost less than the cost of medical care for terminally ill patients and could save them and their family money (NYLN 1). Data that has been collected shows that if 2.7% of patients chose PAS rather than ride the disease to their death, it would save the U.S approximately 627 million dollars a year (Emanuel M.D 1). Further on the cost savings of PAS, if the patient chose PAS it would save families at least 10 thousand dollars because that is the average cost of a patient’s last month to live in the hospital (Emanuel M.D 1). Having PAS available as an option also retains a patient’s dignity (NYLN 1). When the patient chooses PAS, usually the physician inserts 10 ml of a drug called Secobarbital, and then the patient becomes unconscious within a minute and dies within 7 minutes ( Cohen 2). By it being such a quick and uncomplicated death the patient can choose where, and when they want their death to occur. They can even decide if they want to be surrounded by their loved ones while they pass. And several patients have told the physicians that it gave them a lot more dignity being able to control their own

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    is based on the fact that the priority when treating terminally ill patients should be on the quality and not quantity of life. This means that patients must be allowed to have the right to make their own decisions. In a study conducted on assisted suicide in Oregon in 2015, the number one concern for patients requesting PAS is losing autonomy, with 96.2% of patients citing it as a reason for their request. In a country where freedom is of the utmost importance, it is imperative that no liberties be taken away unnecessarily. Many physicians and opponents argue that PAS allows physicians to give up on patients rather than provide them with proper end-of-life care.…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pas Vs Euthanasia

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Individuals who are for legalization of PAS believe that a competent patient should be to choose the timing and manner of their death. There is the belief that a terminally ill patient has the right to refuse specific medical treatment plans if it only prolongs their death. Moreover, if an individual’s quality of life is hindered with consequences such as a loss of independence, loss of self and functional capacities to the point that there is an inability to relieve the suffering, then PAS is viewed as an act of compassion. Society believes in preserving life, illegal PAS excessively limits personal liberties by disallowing a terminally ill person with a strong desire to end their life. Lastly, more transparency between patient and physicians could promote better end of life…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PAS is a great option for patients who choose it, but it also benefits the patient with the price. When talking from an economic standpoint PAS gives the patient a choice on how to spend their money. PAS can save the patient money which can benefit them and their families because, in the end, the money they save from not choosing the end of life care can go towards other expenses. Therefore alleviating financial stressors off the patient and family, allowing them to focus on being together in the patient's last months of their…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The alternative way is Euthanasia, which Anderson describes as, “the intentional killing of a patient by doctor”. Anderson claims that this can only lead to Euthanasia because if we are to be logically compassionate, we can’t discriminate the option from patients who are unable to administer the deadly drugs themselves on account of being handicapped in some way. Anderson also states that there is no constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide. Anderson then again quotes an article from The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, which states four reasons that PAS is a bad idea. The article claims first that it endangers the weak, despite failing safeguards with evidence that in three countries in Europe, “thousands” of cases have been found of doctor’s killing patients without a request.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Pas

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It seems cruel to make someone live in pain and suffering even if it is a short while. I also believe in order to prevent innocent deaths there needs to be strict laws in place to safeguard individuals from false requests of PAS. I also realize in theory PAS may seem like a good idea but as we go deeper into discussion PAS may not be the most practical process. On the flip side I can see how some may oppose PAS from a religious stand point since many religions, especially Catholics, believe that those who commit suicide go to hell; although it could be…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is now allowed in five different U.S. states, among these are: Oregon, Vermont, Washington, California, and Montana with a court ruling. Montana follows a model where individuals must have a terminal illness as well as a prognosis of six months or less to live. Physicians cannot be prosecuted for prescribing medications to hasten death(Physician-Assisted Suicide Fast Facts, par. 1). PAS is defined as, “Suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient 's intent(Physician–assisted Suicide, par. 1).” Recently the argument between whether or not a state can sanction this sort of action has been…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is PAS Ethical?

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Overdose is one of many ways a person can commit suicide which is everyone's individual private right, but the offer from PAS is not one that any individual…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy concerning a new method of death, Physician Assisted Suicide, has provoked a social, legal, and a massive medical debate. Nearly two decades ago, Oregon declared its legalization for the assistance of lethal doses of medication to help terminally ill patients end their lives. Several other states were subsequent to this movement, such as Washington, Vermont, and Montana. Since then, oppositional views and disagreements on this topic have been brought up in court to be legalized for the suffering of patients who are unavoidably assured to death. The legalization of PAS in these states should be revoked because of the many flaws this movement contains.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person is terminally or chronically ill they should have the right to physician assisted suicide. These ill people who are of sound mind and judgment should have the right to die peacefully and with assistance if this is what they choose to do. The choice should be theirs and they should not have to suffer more than necessary, they should be able to save their family the financial ruin and they should be able to leave this earth is in a dignified manner, free of pain. Jack Kevorkian was a Pathologist who lived in Michigan where assisted suicide was not legal. The fact that it was not legal did not stop him from assisting those in need.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When healing a patient is no longer possible, death is imminent and suffering is unbearable the physician's role should shift from healing the patient to relieving their suffering according to their wishes (M. Angell). With that being said, physician assisted suicide should be left as a last resort to be used when all other options have been expended. Keeping someone alive against their will and forcing someone to suffer is as much of a crime as taking someone's life without their consent (F. Girsh). Without PAS patients are subjected to unwanted medical treatment or completely abandoned altogether. Medical technology has advanced incredibly over the years but for the terminally ill it only prolongs suffering (E. De La Torre).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reasons behind Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted suicide (PAS) claim that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death (Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?). The right to die is every human’s choice. Choosing Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide can provide a terminally ill patient with a good end. It can also make it easier on the patients’ family knowing that they chose that it was their time to go. When choosing Euthanasia, the patient is showing strength and dignity.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the death or suicide of a terminally ill person 's life in order to relieve them of their pain and illness. When a person submits to euthanasia, they usually have an incurable and painful illness. But there are other examples where some people want their life to be ended. In many cases, it is only based on the person 's request, but there are times when they may be too ill to make the final decision and then the decision is made by family members or doctors. And in extreme cases the courts will decide.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Against Euthanasia Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout history, philosophers have spent sleepless nights restlessly debating whether people have the right to end their lives, and under what circumstances they may do so. The topic of euthanasia touches upon people’s most fundamental interests; their morality, spirituality and well being, and hence provokes the most passionate of human emotions…. The concept of euthanasia was coined by the ancient Greeks and comes from a compound of two Greek words; Eu (meaning good) and Thanatos (meaning death). The Oxford English dictionary defines euthanasia as the intentional act of causing or hastening the death of a person who is suffering from an incurable and or terminal disease or condition, especially a painful one, for reasons of mercy.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of killing a sick or injured person to end their suffering as stated by Merriam Webster Dictionary. The government is against euthanasia because they state that it is inhumane and that only God can take life away, but the reality of the case is that it is a right that the people have and not everybody has the same belief. With the legalization of euthanasia people can end their suffering and the economy can progress in the way that the government doesn’t have to pay for life support and therapies. When thinking if one has the right to take their life away, most people being religious state that only God has the right to take life away and that it is immoral in every way.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The term “Euthanasia” originally means good death, now commonly known as mercy killing. The modern meaning of euthanasia according to BBC special report it is described as any action or omission intended to end the life of a patient on the grounds that his or her life is not worth living. Legalization of euthanasia has been a debatable topic in many countries with different views in terms of legal and ethical consideration for both healthcare providers and patients. (Fraser & Walters, 2000) With the development of medicines, there is the increasing number of illness too.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays