Argumentative Essay: Should People Receive Euthanasia?

Improved Essays
Should people embrace euthanasia as one of the methods of inducing one to a “merciful death?” There are several reasons why people would argue for and against euthanasia. The process of inducing somebody to death can seem unimaginable but it is emerging as one of the most preferred mode for death particularly for patients with terminal illnesses and whose chances of survival are very low. Terminal illnesses take a great toll on the health of a person, and this presents with signs such as hopelessness and despair about getting back to normal and brisk health. Therefore, there is need to argue why it is justified to have people get induce to death when their quality of life deteriorates. This article presents the argument of why it is justified for patients who have terminal illnesses to end their life.
There are two major arguments to the issue of euthanasia; the
…show more content…
The Bentham principle of utility recognizes the key role of pain and pleasure in life. Secondly, it approves or disapproves of an action on the basis of the amount of pleasure or pain brought with it, the consequences of both pain and pleasure. Thirdly, the principle equates good with pleasure and pain with evil. Fourthly, it asserts that pleasure and pleasure a capable of quantification and therefore can be measured. Therefore in this theory, it means that if the patient, who is terminally ill or is in critical condition is not put on euthanasia, it because a source of evil and pain to the person (Klampfer, 2001). Furthermore pleasure is seen as more rewarding as compared to pain. Therefore there is need to choose what pleases the patient of the family’s patient, and with regard to euthanasia, they can choose to end the life of their loved one. This is because euthanasia seeks to meet what pleases the patient and the family members of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The whole notion of pain, and how every individual experiences pain, is up for debate. We don 't know how another person experiences pain - physical pain or psychic pain. Some of these clinics where assisted suicide or euthanasia is practiced, they call it 'weariness of life. '” (Toews). For many years, those dubbed with the burden of cancer and other terminal illnesses have to suffer through a slow and painful death in the end.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ask to Die or Die Happily Course: WRIT 100 Submitted to: Gregory Shupak Submitted by: Mark Anthony Ecal Garcines Due Date: November 9, 2015 “Go Gently” is an article written by Tim Falconer. The author argues that human should have the option of how, where and when to die. Tim states, we should honour the request of the terminally ill person. He holds that belief because if a person repeatedly ask to die, we should respect the individual’s circumstances.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Other factors include the desire to preserve dignity and personhood in the dying process and opposition to prolonging life by using sophisticated medical technology when it is recognized that care is futile. Closely related to self-determination is the principle of autonomy. This principle states that persons should have the right to make their own decisions about the course of their own lives whenever they can. By extension, they should also have the right to determine the course of their own dying as much as possible. The ethics of physician assisted suicide (PAS) continue to be debated.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a patient is suffering all the patient wants is for someone to show them compassion. The patient also will want another person to suffer with and not for a doctor to offer a lethal injection of drugs to end the patient's suffering. Those who are suffering are more likely to want death if the option of euthanasia is offered as a pain alleviator to others who are suffering or to them in their time of unendurable suffering. Euthanasia is often seen as a victory instead of a freedom when euthanasia is offered to a patient. The many of the suffering patients have also been biasly influenced by the wishes of others on the topic of euthanasia to end the suffering and most importantly life of the suffering person.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should people with terminal illness be forced to go through the pain and suffering of death, when there’s a peaceful, more humane way to die? Euthanasia is the act of ending the life of a person who is suffering from a terminal illness. According to At Issues, Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, differs from assisted suicide in that with euthanasia the doctor can provide and administrate the drugs that are used to end a life, whereas with assisted suicide the doctor may only provide the drugs and not administrate them(At Issues). This paper will examine the pro, con, and my viewpoint on Euthanasia. To begin with, the pro viewpoint is that euthanasia should be an option so the terminally ill do not have to endure needless pain and suffering.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If death is destined due to sickness, then the patient should be able to decide whether they want a peaceful death or a painful death. Patients who are suffering from an incurable disease, or any kind of disability do not deserve to suffer and legalizing euthanasia can help cure their suffering since not many want to live after a period of time when the patient and the doctor knows that it is too late and nothing further can be done to improve the patient’s condition, or relieve their pain. She could not end her life on her own terms, so instead she suffered: a crippling stroke; massive blood loss after an angiogram; dialysis; constant hospitalization; and mistreatment by staff. Month after month, she sank further into despair (Hayes). This excerpt is from an article where its author Mathew Hayes describes the condition and suffering that his grandmother had to go through before she reached the end of it.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of life’s toughest decision is having to decide when is enough, enough? In this case, when is the pain and suffering of a terminally ill patient enough and what if there was an option for them to end their unbearable suffering? The practice and legality of euthanasia has recently become a topic of discussion because of the ethical and moral values that…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline for Arguments on PAS and Euthanasia When addressing the matter of Euthanasia and PAS, “we must first acknowledge that figuring out the benefits and harms of permitting euthanasia or PAS is speculative at best” (Emanuel). As well, it is important to acknowledge the fact that, “no matter which social policy regarding euthanasia or PAS is adopted - legalization or maintaining the current policy of permitting them in individual cases - there will be both benefits and harms” (Emanuel). In this argument, it will be shown that legalizing Euthanasia and PAS within the United States, will help people, by allowing terminally ill patients to realize the end of a good death or, more accurately, a create a higher quality dying experience for them.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    But what if nature taking its course is too painful or too long and the person is in a decrepit state. Whether it’s a states’ issue, thus essay argues that euthanasia should be legalized for the individual that is suffering and has a non-curable illness whenever the circumstances deem it “the best choice” to die. Most…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In healthcare, saving one’s life is as equally important as supporting them in their death. Death is a natural part of one’s life and frequently occurs in the healthcare world. The realization of death as a part of health care has brought about several resources that assist patients with the dying process. Hospice and Palliative Care are two resources that are particularly useful when a patient nears the end of life. However, some patients choose to not use these resources and instead pursue a path of ending their life.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays