The eugenics movement gained popularity throughout the world in the late 19th century and early 20th century by combining science with nationalism, and a fair bit of elitism. Countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada became concerned about the “degradation” of their citizens through the frequent birth of “unfit” children through genetically inferior parents. This concern, which was often founded and funded by rich caucasian males, became a matter of legislature through the passing of immigration restriction, marriage and sterilization laws. Reaching it’s peak of influence during the decade following 1910, eugenics became “unfashionable” following the publication of the negative eugenics employed by the Nazi party through the sterilization of 300,000-400,000 Jews and the horrors of concentration camps.
While the eugenics movement was reaching its height in the 1910s as was the women’s suffrage movement and other feminist movements under first wave feminism. Women began rejecting Victorian ideals of marriage, gender and sexuality--calling for their right to vote, increased education/employment and control of their reproduction. While eugenicists generally supported women’s suffrage, both movements held very different ideals about gender roles, education and reproductive rights. This makes it all the more interesting that quite a few women’s groups and outspoken feminists held eugenic ideals and/or supported the movement such as The National Federation of Women’s Clubs, the Women’s Christian Temperance Union, and the National League of Women Voters. While eugenicists were concerned with women becoming unfeminine and thus unfit mothers, feminists fought for more equality within their marriage and education. Feminist such as Mary Wollstonecraft argued that women’s lack of education harmed their children as children often learned early skills and morality from their mother. Eugenists however feared that education would make women both too independent and unfeminine stating instead, such as Dr. J Richey Horner, “As long as man is attracted by beauty and women by strength, eugenics will in a great measure take care of itself.” Instead of birth control, eugenicists favored forced sterilization. In America alone, thirty states passed sterilization laws that gave the state--through psychiatric hospitals and prisons--and guardians the power to sterilize both children and adults without their consent, or even without their knowledge in some cases. Supported by Buck v. Bell, this led to over 30,000 people being sterilized without their consent from 1907 to 1939. Those sterilized were overwhelmingly women who were classified as “feeble-minded,” a often sexist term with conditions such as “a …show more content…
Michael Willrich asserts that feminist supporters involvement in the eugenics movement is consistent with their support for a class-based program of social control (Ziegler 212). Disagreeing Linda Gordon claims that feminist reformers who supported eugenics slowly abandoned their interest in social issues of women and later supported purely eugenic reforms (Ziegler 212). Other historians believe that feminists conformed to a popular and dominant cultural trend in order to protect their own interests while others believe their eugenics involvement was due to personal based racism (Ziegler 213). These issues of historiography are also found in most key figures of the feminist movement, such as Margaret Sanger, where the degree to which eugenics was a part of her legal agenda differs greatly upon the interpretation (Ziegler