Eudaimonia In St. Augustine's Work

Improved Essays
Although many philosophers, theologians, and scholars have left their mark on society throughout the years, it is arguable that very few managed to spark modern thought and formulate strong ideologies such as the Greek philosopher Aristotle, and the theologian St. Augustine of Hippo. Both of these philosophers worked to understand the true concept of eudaimonia in our everyday lives, and how living a virtuous life will impact an everyday person. While some might argue how Aristotle’s works actually influenced some of St. Augustine’s writings through a common admiration to Plato, their conflicting ideas regarding the reasoning for living a virtuous life and the purpose of a supreme being, or a supreme good, separated these two philosophies to act as conflicting works. To Aristotle, this “good” was the human mind’s ability to understand and achieve eudaimonia, wisdom, and truth; when St. Augustine believed that the “good” …show more content…
Through their differences of belief, the differing concept of eudaimonia and virtues arose. By analyzing these philosophers and their works, it is clear that their ideologies and philosophies address these differences and help place their works in an admirable light.
When speaking of the word ‘eudaimonia’, it is easy to associate the term with something as simple as the word happiness. For the true meaning of eudaimonia, it is important to understand it not as an emotion, but as a well-being. This well-being becomes a superior state, one that would arise through living a virtuous life in all senses. Many philosophers have constructed unique ideas to what is required to achieve a state of eudemonia or how to live a virtuous life in a world of temptation.
Beginning with Aristotle, he believed that virtue is simply the key to achieving eudaimonia in this current lifetime. Aristotle saw

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. Euthyphro accuses his father of impiety in the death of a servant, whom he tied up and cast into a ditch for killing another while drunk. A murderer by default, the man perished from starvation and exposure while Euthyphro’s father awaited further instructions. 2. Although Euthyphro asserts himself proficient on all matters of morality, Socrates teaches him humility by highlighting his overall ignorance regarding the divine.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Euthyphro, the main theme and meaning of the nature of pious was discussed between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is trying to help Euthyphro find the reasoning behind what makes something pious and impious. In this comparative analysis, Socrates entices the mind behind the reasons of pious and philosophy.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) With duty-based ethics it’s about obedience of law, performing an act morally because it’s out of duty. The act is based on the fact that it’s our obligation, we do the duty out of oughtness. Virtue ethics is different from duty-based ethics as one is not acting out of oughtness or duty, but out of motivation and feelings. Acting on moral character. Virtue ethics would be to perform an act for example out of love for a mother who is ill; you take care of her because of the love you have for her not because it your duty.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle proposes in his well renowned work, Nicomachean Ethics, a way of life that is structured on the foundation of what is happiness for human beings. Nicomachean Ethics provides the means in which are best determined to achieve the ultimate goal of an individual’s life which according to Aristotle is happiness. The definition of happiness is determined differently based on an individual’s perspective of the concept which the philosopher states in the beginning of Chapter Four in Book One of Nicomachean Ethics. Although differing in opinions and perspective of what happiness can best be defined as, there is a formal agreement of understanding amongst the people which Aristotle labels “the many and the refined” (Aristotle, Bartlett, & Collins,…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle’s Account of Pleasure Introduction Aristotle emphasizes the importance of pleasure to human beings and demonstrates how we should live. The two accounts of pleasure in the Eudemian Ethics and the Nicomachean Ethics are broadly similar and agree with the supporting and opposing theories as well as on the nature of pleasure. The purpose of this paper is to best bring out the Aristotelian ethics in both the happiness and pleasure. The paper looks into the details the Nicomachean Ethics of these issues and goes into the details of his views in comparison with opposing views.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on what are the requirements for people to be considered good, or virtuous. He explains how political science is the ultimate science, since it deals not only with individual good, but with a societal good, which involves leadership in the most significant manner. For him, being virtuous is a necessary component of good life, which is one that is lived well, and may be perceived as “happy.” For practical purposes, however, in a world where one must interact with others, it is difficult to reach a consensus on the patterns of behavior that can be seen as virtuous. Nonetheless, Aristotle provides a most thorough structure to living virtuously, which he opens to be molded to the circumstances and…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every art and every inquiry, and likewise every action and choice, seems to aim at some good, and hence it has been beautifully said that the good is that at which all things aim.” As Aristotle makes inquires and deliberates over what is the highest end for the human life, he debates over what constitutes the highest good. Throughout the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that we aim at some end through our pursuits of action, and that those ends are in some way connected at achieving the highest good. Aristotle suggests the possibility of happiness, translated from the Greek word eudaimonia, which refers to a “state of having a good indwelling spirit or being in a contented state of being healthy, happy and prosperous.” For the one who…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers such as Aristotle, The Buddha, and the more modern-day Nel Noddings have all begged the question, “What does it mean to live a good life?” Aristotle’s main view aims at happiness, and focus on the self. The Buddha and Nel Noddings both believe that one should not fully focus on the self, but more on the selfless acts for others. Each of these philosophers has determined their own proper way to lead a good life and I will examine each philosophy through comparison to the eldest, Aristotle. I believe Aristotle’s philosophy to be agreeable, but I feel he is missing certain key components which I will discuss by the end of the essay.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophers Aristotle and Augustine both wrote extensively on what they believed happiness was and how to achieve the good life. However, both prolific thinkers had differing opinions on achieve this goal. For example, Aristotle believed that the path to the good life was obtained through reason; whereas Augustine believed that it was obtained through Scripture and Divine Revelation because God’s grace helps one to achieve the good life, but reason alone is not enough to get that. In Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle shares his belief that the way to a good life, which he refers to as happiness, is achieved through reason.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each human has a purpose in their life, an end goal, and when they reach that purpose they gain a greater understanding of what life and the things in that life are, “Aristotle agrees with Plato that all things have a purpose or function, and understanding those purposes, goals, or functions is how to understand things themselves.” (Classical Ethics, 37). Aristotle also believes that a humans can’t have true happiness without truly satisfying what there function is, “… Aristotle argued that happiness is not possible without the excellent functioning of a human being’s unique capacity or ability, that is, reason.” (Classical Ethics, 48). The Philosophers discuss the fact that one must be virtues and becomes virtues when searching for the good life, “Thus, Plato concludes that moral virtue is ultimately based on knowledge of the Supreme Form of the Good.”…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every person in the world seeks attributes in his or her life that end in pleasure, goodness and happiness. It is then we come to find why humans seek these characteristics in their day to day lives. According to Aristotle, he distinguishes between these three attributes pleasure, goodness, and happiness and answers the overall question on why humans seek these characteristics in their lives. Within Aristotle’s text, he goes into depths on happiness, the virtues and the mean of reason, and lastly how to achieve the good life. From a young age we began to understand the simple terms of our feelings, distinguishing them between the words happy, sad, or angry.…

    • 2041 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He thoroughly discussed the realms in which happiness can be achieved, with in the realms are the key concept of virtues; moral and intellectual. In his literature he said “If the virtues are concerned with actions…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays