Neither choice can prevail in providing Daniel with the most desirable result, so Daniel must choose to do what is right. Choosing to notify Sarah about his findings, Daniel’s intentions would not be to ruin Sarah and Blake’s relationship or make Sarah unhappy, but to make Sarah aware about Blake’s actions at the party. By going through with choice, Daniel would make the right decision because he would do so with good intentions, and would no longer continue to keep this secret from Sarah. Even though the information Daniel withholds may be inadmissible, secrets about her own relationship should not be kept from Sarah. Regardless of what the consequences are, whether it be the end of Sarah’s relationship with Blake or the end of Sarah’s relationship with himself, the decision of notifying Sarah will always be seen as moral in the view of deontological ethics. The consequences have no matter because “the universal herein laid down is one of procedure. It prescribes a mode of behaving, not a goal of action” (274). Many see this as one of the flaws of deontological ethics, but it is actually what makes it superior to utilitarianism - in this
Neither choice can prevail in providing Daniel with the most desirable result, so Daniel must choose to do what is right. Choosing to notify Sarah about his findings, Daniel’s intentions would not be to ruin Sarah and Blake’s relationship or make Sarah unhappy, but to make Sarah aware about Blake’s actions at the party. By going through with choice, Daniel would make the right decision because he would do so with good intentions, and would no longer continue to keep this secret from Sarah. Even though the information Daniel withholds may be inadmissible, secrets about her own relationship should not be kept from Sarah. Regardless of what the consequences are, whether it be the end of Sarah’s relationship with Blake or the end of Sarah’s relationship with himself, the decision of notifying Sarah will always be seen as moral in the view of deontological ethics. The consequences have no matter because “the universal herein laid down is one of procedure. It prescribes a mode of behaving, not a goal of action” (274). Many see this as one of the flaws of deontological ethics, but it is actually what makes it superior to utilitarianism - in this