Arby’s, and its employee that was injured, did not conduct social responsibility in this case because they failed to meet the obligation as an ethical business to shut down service immediately and have their customers throw away their food just in case. It is not favorable to have to shut down service because it results in losing profit, but Arby’s should have used the ethical pillars of respect and responsibility to take care of their customers first and foremost. By using the pillar of respect then Arby’s would have acted in a way that would have protected their customers as if they were their own family members. By using the pillar of responsibility then Arby’s would have been ethical by being accountable for the
Arby’s, and its employee that was injured, did not conduct social responsibility in this case because they failed to meet the obligation as an ethical business to shut down service immediately and have their customers throw away their food just in case. It is not favorable to have to shut down service because it results in losing profit, but Arby’s should have used the ethical pillars of respect and responsibility to take care of their customers first and foremost. By using the pillar of respect then Arby’s would have acted in a way that would have protected their customers as if they were their own family members. By using the pillar of responsibility then Arby’s would have been ethical by being accountable for the