Ethical Principles Of Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Show More
Ethical: value and principle
Justice involves the respect of people, the decisions they make and their personal rights. Not allowing an individual to partake in dignifies death is associated to the righteousness and liabilities of charity. Charity entails that we aid in allowing people’s lives to become satisfactory. There are people all throughout the world dying from starvation and terminal illnesses. Ethically it is challenging to reason that because one did not donate additionally to charity, that one has generated or affected a causation just as cruel as if one had essentially murdered those individuals their self (Dr. Peard, personal communication, 2013). Furthermore, when it comes to talking about terminology of euthanasia there is …show more content…
The argument surfaces because the majority of those who challenge euthanasia are willing to accept the disturbance or absence of life-sustaining treatments for terminally ill patients or those in comatose states, who cannot give consent for themselves. This is when life-sustaining treatment is seen as futile. In addition, there is a belief that a terminally ill patient can have palliative, sedative or similar agents to help relieve the patient 's sign and symptoms, but it could prolong the patient’s time till …show more content…
Throughout this paper there has been an examination of the background and laws of euthanasia, which allowed the reader to learn why medical interventions should ultimately be legalized within the United States and how specific individuals have been affected by the current laws. Arguments were revealed for each side of the debate, those for the legalization of euthanasia and for those against the legalization with ethical and legal evidence to support. Terminology was emphasized for the clarification of how euthanasia and terms alike are actually not alike and need to be uncategorized for the promotion of understanding for the health care community and society as a whole. There is a possible change for society and the medical field, if they can both take this education about ethics, history, legality and additional consideration supported throughout this paper and apply it to future

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Nancy Morrison's Case Essay: Voluntary Active Euthanasia
    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nancy Morrison's Case Essay: Voluntary Active Euthanasia

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Margaret Battin Euthanasia Analysis
    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Margaret Battin Euthanasia Analysis

    The principle of mercy states that suffering ought to be relieved. Unless the suffering will give rise to some overriding benefit, or unless the achievement of some benefit would be made impossible by relieving pain. (Battin, 225). In the case of Euthanasia this principle means that doctors ought to relieve pain if the patients “benefits” are being outweighed by the detriments.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Dan Brants Against Euthanasia
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Dan Brants Against Euthanasia

    I feel that the decision should be up to the terminally ill patient’s family on whether they should die by the use of certain medicines instead of natural causes. I don’t feel it’s right to be up to the doctor or the patient because sometimes patients get misdiagnosed. Richard Brant mentions that euthanasia is a way of relieving the pain someone is feeling and defines suicide as doing something that results in one’s death. Moreover, Dan Brock argues that euthanasia is not a bad thing especially active euthanasia. Daniel Callahan is against euthanasia because he thinks it will leads in the wrong direction.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Physician Assisted Suicide

    Euthanasia should be allowed for competent terminally ill patient to end their suffering, reduce financial issues for hospitals and families, and protect the rights of people in determining their own fate. Assisted death is presented in two different ways, one that is called physician-assisted “suicide” and voluntary active euthanasia. Both suggest a difference in the degree of involvement and behavior. Physician-assisted suicide includes making lethal means available to the patient to be used at a time of the patient’s own choosing. In contrast, voluntary active euthanasia includes the physician taking an active role in carrying out the patient’s request, which would include intravenous delivery of a lethal substance.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide In Today's Society
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide In Today's Society

    In today’s society, one of the many controversial issues discussed is physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. There have been many questions and opinions concerning the incident, and as a result, some people have been criticized for their opinions of physician-assisted suicide. Many have debated about what is wrong and right yet, none of us actually know what is best for society. Furthermore, we ask ourselves, “Should patients have the right to die? Should we agree to the patient’s request regardless if they want to die based on emotional/mentally reasons, their fear of becoming weak, or their condition?”…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide Argumentative Essay

    The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachels: The Morality Of Euthanasia
    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    James Rachels: The Morality Of Euthanasia

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Tony Nicklinson's Argument Against Euthanasia
    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tony Nicklinson's Argument Against Euthanasia

    For the past six years you have been unable to walk, unable to communicate with family, unable to carry out simple everyday tasks on your own. You live with a constantly growing sense of indignity, misery and helplessness. This was the life of Tony Nicklinson who, after being diagnosed with “locked-in syndrome” was denied the ability to pass away peacefully through euthanasia and was forced, as he described it, to remain in a “living nightmare”. Due to his condition, tony was left in a permanent vegetative state with no hope of recovery. He was denied peaceful passing by the high court judges on two occasions, once in 2010 and then again 2 years later.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Brock's Argument For The Moral Permissibility Of Voluntary Active Euthanasia
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Brock's Argument For The Moral Permissibility Of Voluntary Active Euthanasia

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    The reasons behind Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted suicide (PAS) claim that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death (Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide be Legal?). The right to die is every human’s choice. Choosing Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide can provide a terminally ill patient with a good end. It can also make it easier on the patients’ family knowing that they chose that it was their time to go. When choosing Euthanasia, the patient is showing strength and dignity.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical And Moral Dilemmas: The Ethics Of Assisted Suicide
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ethical And Moral Dilemmas: The Ethics Of Assisted Suicide

    No person should have to endure terminal suffering that is unremitting, unbearable, or prolonged. When the burdens of life outweigh the benefits because of uncontrollable pain, severe psychological suffering, loss of dignity, or loss of quality of life as judged by the patient, and when the circumstances are not remediable, the dying person should be able to ask for and receive help in assisted suicide (Marker, Smith 47-51). It is further argued that assisted suicide for incurably ill persons experiencing extreme suffering can be distinguished from euthanasia used for the purpose of genocide on the grounds that it is based on principles of dignity, honor, and respect and is chosen and enacted by the dying individuals, rather than being forced on them against their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Right To Die
    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Right To Die

    Right To Die As medical technology advances, a vast amount of different opportunities arise, one of these being euthanasia of humans. Euthanasia is also called assisted suicide, but from a legal standpoint, it is debated whether or not euthanasia is considered murder. For some, they believe that euthanasia can be classified as murder because the doctor is the one who prescribes the lethal dosage of medication. But for patients who experience unbearable pain from a terminal illness, this practice is a last resort, and it should be their decision to make as the government has no legal position to tell them otherwise. As long as there are specific requirements in order to euthanize a person, it should be allowed.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue Ethics: The Ethical Theory Of Euthanasia
    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Virtue Ethics: The Ethical Theory Of Euthanasia

    The word euthanasia derives from greek origins that translates to ‘good death’. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. The controversy surrounding euthanasia stems from whether an individual with a disability is able to make the choice to put an end to their life. It is difficult to establish whether the individual has a rational state of mind. Philosophical theories of morality and rationality can be applied to an individual’s right to death with dignity.…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialist Theory Of Euthanasia
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Consequentialist Theory Of Euthanasia

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings