Ethical Standards Of The Way We Treat Animals Analysis

Good Essays
The ethical standards of the way we treat everyone and everything are different. If you are a white male, you are going to be treated with great respect. A white female is still treated well, but not as well as a white male because they are believed to be superior. All people are treated with different levels of respect simply based on the views that someone has about a person. We treat our animals with the least amount of respect as we can and push our treatment of animals to the limit. The animals living in our world with us have done nothing to us and yet we go out of our way to find ways to treat them with the least bit of respect as possible. Why? Because we do not care about how the animal feels. We do not consider the possibility that …show more content…
From the beginning animals, namely dogs, have been considered to be man’s best friend. If this is the case why are animals being treated without the same respect that we would give our human best friend? The only difference is that dogs cannot talk back and have a real conversation with you like your human best friend could. Dogs are loyal and they can not hurt you like a person can so why would you want to treat your animal poorly when all they ever do is love you unconditionally. Animals do their best to please us and occasionally they fail but we as humans do not always succeed in things either so what is so different about animals not being able to constantly please us. We should be treating all living things, from humans to animals to plants, the same way that we should treat anything with respect. Animals deserve our respect, they do so much for us and they should be praised for the good things they do. As a reward, they should not be tested on and they should be given the same treatment as other human beings. The reason animals are believed to be so different from us is because they are thought to lack Factor X. Factor X is the quality that humans contain which allow them to be treated with a certain level of respect. Francis Fukuyama, the author of “Human Dignity” states, “Factor X is the human essence, the most basic meaning of what it is to be human” (186). Animals are

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The controversy over animal rights is one of the most argumentative in ethics and morality. Many people believe animals do not have rights, and that the people who support animal rights are liberals who need to find other outlets for their beliefs. Others feel it is our moral obligation to nurture animals as they cannot speak or act for themselves. Immanuel Kant’s view does not claim that it is permissible to cause pointless animal suffering, but he does insist that we have no obligations to the animals themselves. I will argue that humans do have obligations to the animals themselves.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Direct duty means that we have a direct duty to not be harmful, but kind to animals. Doing kind acts aren’t guaranteed to be morally right because you can still be kind but cruel at the same time in a way. For…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong. It is often argued that we treat animals morally wrong by testing chemicals on them to make sure it’s safe for human use. In order for our species to thrive and expand our knowledge we would need to test certain chemicals on animals because they are disposable. Sure humans are also disposable both since we are barely reaching the pinnacle of basic human right, I doubt people want to be volunteering other people to have experiment done on…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Angelou wants the reader to feel sympathetic towards the animals knowing that they can also fear for their lives. Maya Angelou end the poem by saying, “They existed, we can be” (Line 38), in my opinion this means that humans and animals can live in the same nurtured environment. But I don’t think animals and humans can thrive side by side. There is a hierarchy that humans are at the top of, humans will always utilize them for what best fits us. The truth is animals will never be treated will the same moral respect as humans will get.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is important to know that cruelty is not the only way of harm that we should be aware of. Eating animals does not promote animal equality. According to Singer humans should not consume other species because of the way they are treated in their last moments of life. By eating animals, we promote their lives in cages. Humans tend to become accustomed to their daily eating routine.…

    • 2501 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This means that the human-created notion of a right can only apply to humans. Therefore, animals have no rights, but humans still have an obligation to treat animals properly. In an effort to make the wording more concise, the term “animal” will refer to all animals (Kingdom Animalia) other than humans. A right can be defined as a moral requirement that aims to better the life of an individual. Rights can provide protections…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hence, there is no reason why humans shouldn 't tolerate lesser intelligence in animals. Singer explains that although both groups cannot be treated the same because of their significant differences, humans should aim to meet the needs and interests of animals. They ought to take into account the effect their actions have on animals. For instance, no animal can tolerate torment. This is because animals ' feel pain just like humans.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Humans have responsibilities to animals. They need love, attention, food, water, etc. While Cupp does believe abuse is wrong, and there should be punishment, he sees no reason for actual rights. As mentioned before, animals do have thoughts and feelings. They know right from wrong, if they didn’t then they wouldn’t know to bathe their litter, or help comfort someone when they are feeling down.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I also believe that it is moral to test on animals if it has a positive result to help aid humans. On the other hand, it is morally wrong to test on animals when it does not serve a purpose to humans. I am a speciesist and I believe that the life of a human is more important than the life of a bear. However, I believe that it is morally wrong to torture innocent animals for no reason. Cruelty should not be permitted, animals have a right to not be treated bad for no reason, but other than that they do not have many…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays