Ethical Standards Of The Way We Treat Animals Analysis

Improved Essays
The ethical standards of the way we treat everyone and everything are different. If you are a white male, you are going to be treated with great respect. A white female is still treated well, but not as well as a white male because they are believed to be superior. All people are treated with different levels of respect simply based on the views that someone has about a person. We treat our animals with the least amount of respect as we can and push our treatment of animals to the limit. The animals living in our world with us have done nothing to us and yet we go out of our way to find ways to treat them with the least bit of respect as possible. Why? Because we do not care about how the animal feels. We do not consider the possibility that …show more content…
From the beginning animals, namely dogs, have been considered to be man’s best friend. If this is the case why are animals being treated without the same respect that we would give our human best friend? The only difference is that dogs cannot talk back and have a real conversation with you like your human best friend could. Dogs are loyal and they can not hurt you like a person can so why would you want to treat your animal poorly when all they ever do is love you unconditionally. Animals do their best to please us and occasionally they fail but we as humans do not always succeed in things either so what is so different about animals not being able to constantly please us. We should be treating all living things, from humans to animals to plants, the same way that we should treat anything with respect. Animals deserve our respect, they do so much for us and they should be praised for the good things they do. As a reward, they should not be tested on and they should be given the same treatment as other human beings. The reason animals are believed to be so different from us is because they are thought to lack Factor X. Factor X is the quality that humans contain which allow them to be treated with a certain level of respect. Francis Fukuyama, the author of “Human Dignity” states, “Factor X is the human essence, the most basic meaning of what it is to be human” (186). Animals are

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages

    But, not every non-human animal goes to war, nor do non-human animals change the environment to the point of making other living organisms go extinct, or take more than they need from the environment, or lock each other in cages. So, if a person wants to claim that humans are superior to non-human animals, I ask, superior in what…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is wrong to mistreat animals because mistreating animals is like mistreating another human being. Animals feel pain the same way humans feel pain. They are living beings and bleed like humans bleed. This alone isn’t what distinguishes animals from having or not having rights. Animals do have rights to a certain extent.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals should be treated humanely because, according to science, the differences between animals and humans are less than what we think. He believes that animals should be given the rights that protect them from inhumane treatment and human consumption. He is telling us that we have to give them the same rights that a human possesses. In affirmation to Jeremy Rifkin, we should treat animals humanely because they also have a heart that can feel pain and a brain that can think.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since they lack the ability to reason, they can’t have rights so they aren’t responsible. Does that make it acceptable to treats animals badly? Of course not; but animals can’t decide their fate so the humans must decide for them. In "An Animal's Place," Michael Pollan introduces Peter Singer's argument, which is both difficult, and simple to argue against. Based on equality, people realize they aren’t equal at all: "Some are smarter than others, more gifted, and better looking.”…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animals have saved us many times, and yet we still say that they don 't deserve our respect? Rescue dogs save lives and track down missing people. Horses are used for entertainment, as well as tigers, lions, elephants, and ponies. Snake venom is used for remedies, and we even use insects to color and flavor our food. The least we could do is stop hunting and maintain the few species that we have…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How would you feel if you were taken away from your home, taken away from your family, for the enjoyment of others? How would you feel if you were left in a tiny box with very little food? This is how we treat animals for our own personal and selfish benefit. Human benefit should never overrule any damage or destruction to these innocent animals. You may ask, what have humans done in the past and present to hurt animals?…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human beings are only obliged to extend ethical treatment to animals only if they are endangered, domesticated, or abused. Sure one can raise the argument for Darwinism to take it’s role, but if humans have the ability to alter mother nature’s intentions, then why let it happen? Besides, every single plant, animal, or organism contributes to an ecosystem, and are either prey,predator, or producer and create an interdependence on one another for survival. If an endangered species ends up extinct, then the whole ecosystem will suffer.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the wise man Edward Freeman once said, “These awful wrongs and sufferings forced upon the innocent, helpless, faithful animal race, form the blackest chapter in the whole world’s history.” In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin discusses that animals are no different than humans. Being no different than humans means that someone or something is similar to a human being because of either their characteristics or similar body parts. Animals are like humans in the way that they are intelligent, affectionate, and skillful. Animals learn by their behavior as well as humans, however, the only difference is many animals are brutally abused.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does it mean to have a heart of change? Animals are much more similar to us than the scientific community believed for a long time, but today many in the scientific community believe that they experience, excitement and depression and the same emotions as human beings. They have a surprising level of intelligence, in that they can achieve sophisticated tool making tasks and posses qualities that the majority of people never imagined. It is so hard to realize that so many human beings are treating our fellow companion with no regards. In “ A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin claims that all animals have similar qualities as human beings and that they deserve as much respect as us.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While non-human animals devote most of their time to satisfy instinctual needs, humans have the ability to write intricate pieces of literary fiction or thinking about what party candidate best represents their ideology and social needs. Why should we extend the principle of equality to non-human animals if there are a plethora of differences between the humankind and other species? Peter Singer argues that there “is no barrier to the case of extending the basic principle of equality to nonhuman animals” (Singer, 1989, p. 149), for the differences between humans and other animals can be addressed by providing different treatment and rights to the needs of each group. When Singer says that we need to extend the basic principle of equality, he specifies that he will consider this principle to be equality of consideration. What the author means is that we ought not to give greater weight to the interests of one group over…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animals are not human. However close they may be, that is up to biology, but the fact still remains that animals are not human. In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin says that science has discovered that animals “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love – and these findings are changing how we view animals.” (15)…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s society, humans have many expectations to live up to, to be considered as a decent human being. But, what’s the point of having all these expectations when most of us fail to live up to them? “What Should a Billionaire Give - and What Should You?” by Peter Singer is a story that discusses the obligations that Billionaires should have when it comes to the people less fortunate than them. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan is a story discussing that the reasons animals are so mistreated today is because we lost everyday contact with them. “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell is a story about George debating if he should shoot an escaped elephant or not.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After studying multiple views on animal testing I have come to realize my personal view has now changed since the start of my research. Before undergoing heavy study into animal testing I believed that all types of animal testing should be stopped, but now I believe that the idea is very beneficial and should only be done when the rights of the animal are considered. In the coming years, hopefully, more regulations can be passed to ensure that all animal’s lives are protected during experimentation. Although most animals are treated with care and no pain is dealt to them when undergoing testing, it would be a lie if I stated no animals are harmed during the process. Animal testing is extremely useful in developing life-saving drugs and medicine.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The ethical treatment of animals should be taken more seriously because of the cruelty suffered by animals at amusement events, factories and in the research field. Animals ethics is a term to describe the way the human reacts with the animal and how the animal should properly be treated. Many philosophers believe that since animals doesn’t have the moral judgement that humans have, then anyone can do whatever they want to do them because they don’t know right from wrong. An animal is very important, the animal will know if what is happening to them is normal or not, many things people do to them wouldn’t be something they experience on a daily basis. Animals doesn't deserve to be treated any differently than humans.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays