Ethical Relativism

Improved Essays
In the philosophical world, there are varying definitions of the word “relativism”. From the early era of the Sophists to the atheist perspective of David Hume, to the theory of ethics from Immanuel Kant, etc. Throughout each of these philosophical categories, we can break each of them down to identify their own definitions, as we will do later. In addition to the concept of ethics, the two main ethical topics in philosophy are both ethical and cognitive relativism. Although we will only discuss ethical relativism, both of these beliefs have been argued throughout the history of philosophical debates.
Ethical relativism is a very ambiguous concept. As a whole includes the views of various different countries and cultures which, in a nutshell,
…show more content…
Chinese people will have Chinese truths while American people will have American truths, respectively. Human beings will, at the end of the day, pursue what they think is best for them. With so many cultures and beliefs, ethical relativism is fueled by this practice. Much like the example used earlier, socially “accepted” acts could alter the philosophy of some individuals due to them no longer being the in minority. For this, let us take the example of gay marriage. In the 1980’s, the AIDS/HIV epidemic clouded the United States regarding gay …show more content…
The abundance of options and beliefs allow individuals as a whole to expand their reach and see varying cultures and views and resonate with the one that they view as the best. Collectivism just only complicates this further while individuality and the option to choose is bliss. As mentioned earlier, people will not nor should they all believe in the same thing, because if they do, there is no room for debate and improvement. With various cultures and views, we’re able to examine and understand the position of people or cultures that we disagree with or cultures that we’re not affiliated with. The quest for truth is worth the journey but we must realize that everyone is different - each journey will be different than the previous one. Although some journeys may be alike, they aren’t one hundred percent the same. The main problem in my view in today's time would be that people no longer value the idea of individuality. People only want to be affiliated with something if their friends or family are affiliated with it, they no longer respect others to choose for

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the subject of ethical relativism, Ruth Benedict believes that cultural relativism and ethical relativism do not interfere with each other, also moral principles does not derive from cultural acceptance, furthermore, there are universal moral codes based on common aspects. (Vice and Virtue) While I do agree that there a set of moral standards that does not differ much from others, nevertheless,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These universal principles go against ethical relativism to make it…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Metaethics never existed there would be no deeper meaning to morality itself. Metaethics is a branch of philosophy that analyzes moral values and focuses on the question “what is morality itself is?” (Pacillo-Dellino). Metaethics which is also referred to as “Second Order” has four basic stanzas that are called Four Basic Stanzas of Metaethics. The four basic stanzas of Metaethics are Absolutism, Objectivism, Cultural and Subjective Relativism, and Emotivism.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Views on Moral Relativism Relativism is one of the main concepts of ethics. Most moral theorist relate to ethics within their articles that they had written, either being against moral relativism or being supporters. Throughout Mary Midgley’s article “Trying Out One’s New Sword,” she argues about the problems that are related to moral relativism. Another philosopher, John Arthur wrote an article “Religion, Morality and Conscience,” which also addresses the issue of relativism from the perspective of foundationalism.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The moral codes claim what is “right” and what is “wrong”. When it comes to cultural relativism, there is no universal truth, however, it does have a cultural code. There are six main points about the topic cultural relativism that may help an individual understand how cultural relativism plays a role into a…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Four Types Of Relativism

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Relativism is multifaceted. Cultural Relativism is related to the morals followed and created because of the culture in which one is raised in. Descriptive Ethical Relativism is almost just like Cultural Relativism, but it has to do with things that are tolerated in one country that would not be tolerated in a different country. Lastly, Normative Relativism just ties in the fact that there is no quote on quote, right or wrong due to cultural and societal differences. Works Cited O’Sullivan, Stephen and Philip A. Pecorino.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Elements of Moral Philosophy” by Rachels, Cultural Relativism is explained by using real world cultural differences to support and criticize Cultural Relativism. In an overview of Rachels’ arguments in favor of the absolute truth of Cultural Relativism Rachels explains that because cultures are developed…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism is the theory that morality is relative to the normal practices of one's culture. Whether an action is right or wrong, depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. One action may be morally right in one society but, be morally wrong in another. Ethical relativists believe there are no universal moral standards. One society cannot judge another society.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1) Benedict think that morality is when you decide something is right with approval of society and it is something that people in one place create their own culture. Subjectivism is when morality is accepted depending on what each individual think is right or wrong and conventionalism is that morality is accepted based on what society this is right or wrong. She is auguring for the latter. 2) according to Pojaman the different between culture relativism and ethical relativism is that in culture relativism it a belief that the fact of morality rule is different society to society and the ethical relativism is that people in different group should have different opinion about following on if something is what is right or wrong.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays