The Definition Of Methodological Relativism?

The definition of methodological relativism is when anthropologists would sacrifice his/her own culture, belief and value of what they been taught in order to better understand other people culture. The reason why anthropologists rely on this is because having a better knowledge to understand other cultures without interfering other people. It 's been trying to be being neutral in their own belief and culture which is one of the many ways how anthropologist does it. The risk fact of ignoring is that they will be a lot disagreement and if they 're a lot disagreement how can we accept stuff if couldn 't understand how they 're way life is as normal as ours. Moral relativism is defined as the idea that whatever culture makes it okay, as along everyone in that culture agree with it then it 's okay. Moral relativism is good to keep everyone in peace by how everyone would agree with it and not debate about the arguments. But Moral relativism is not the right way say for example that the majority of the people accepts that cause pain to other people is a good thing. …show more content…
Emotivism is used to purposely influencing people 's behaviour and using moral language as to express one attitude. Emotivism could be shown as to morally good and morally wrong. So is Emotivism right? Not really because Emotivism says that emotion and morality are the same. But in fact, it wrong emotion and morality are not the same because sometimes we could get our feeling wrong for example is right to sell slaves. At times, we feel it alright since it morally good, but for the slaves, they seem it morally bad by how they 're being treated. So Emotivism is wrong because we couldn 't say emotion and morality are good just because feel the same the way. It the fact the issues are more serious to a degree that we are hurting other people that we might feel different emotions and mortality so it wrong to say they 're the