Ethical Relativism Analysis

Improved Essays
A part of human nature is to be protective in a violent and aggressive way towards others who try and do harm to you or your family. Thus, since humans started to interact with one another, strong and powerful bonds have been forged between them forming societies that today make up a common color coded map of the world. Within each section of the map the society that resides there developed and implemented an ethical code for the betterment of the whole society. As a society grows larger, the guidelines depicting right from wrong begin to blur and become difficult to pinpoint. My family is a society that resides in the neighborhood Pembrey; Pembrey is also a society. My family believes in forgiveness despite the crime, however the community …show more content…
In her paper, she states her view of a social system as “communities with common beliefs and practices, which have become integrated patterns of ideas and practices.” Benedict goes on to make an analogy that a culture is a work of art; as a painter chooses a theme for his work so does a society choose a theme for morality. With emphasis on this central theme, whatever it may be, both the painter and society base their masterpiece off it. Each masterpiece or morality is different but we have no position of authority to say one is superior to another. Benedict goes on to say that morals are defined culturally based on what the previous generations deemed appropriate. She uses marginalized groups such as homosexuals to illustrate her point more fully. She references ancient Greece where homosexuality did not have a negative connotation and the act was not immoral, however, in certain parts of america homosexuality is looked down upon and gay bashing is commonplace. She uses this example to clearly show that different cultures have different moral standards and …show more content…
Michael Lynch, the author of True to Life, wrote how every truth is situational and that some trivial, personal, religious, and scientific truths are worthwhile while some are not. Living a happier life because I did not find out if my wife cheated on me or not; personal truth is not always worth pursuing. Leading a fearful life because someone is afraid of God; religious truth is not always worth pursuing. Cloning a human so that we never die will eventually corrupt the human race and kill the planet; scientific truth is not always worth pursing. Thus not all truth is worth pursuing but rather the ideas of how to live a moral life

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Lens Analysis

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ethical lens perspective is a group of four different views of ethical behavior. The Rights/Responsibility Lens focuses on defining your rights and responsibilities and using them to fulfill your duties. The Results Lens focuses on making choices that have the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The Relationship Lens focuses on being fair and insuring everyone else is treated fairly. The Reputation Lens focuses on developing virtues that build character in yourself and will be beneficial to the community.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While—for the sake of argument—it is possible that there is no correct answer, this simply means that one or both of us are mistaken. The same goes for morality. Perspectives on morality may vary between cultures, but this in no way implies the nonexistence of “correct” moral principles. In short, Benedict’s argument is problematic.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had many impacts on historical events in us history.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery And Morality

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Benedict’s depiction is also true for morality, because, in society, the morality of an action is directly equated to its normality. However,…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Positions Analysis

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Introduction Over many years, there has been argument over the duty a physician has in the war. Overall a physician or any health care professional has a duty to their patients and this must be the same in noncombatants and in war. The struggle can be hard when decisions can be influenced by combat, however health care professionals are advised to honor their ethical duties. In the following, I will talk about the summary of the different views on this subject, how the ethical principles fit in to these arguments, the consequences it has on the health care professionals, along with my opinion on this issue.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truth Is Good Analysis

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Truth is Good? One of the four key aspects of truth outlined in Michael P. Lynch’s book True to Life is that truth is good. I consider this statement to be slightly at fault and will try to explain my reasonings in this paper. First I will discuss Lynch’s sections in his book concerning truth being good. After that I will present ideas that contradict Lynch’s statement and discuss them.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America, the land of the free and home of the brave. In the 1920s America was the land of the liberal-minded urbanites and home of the traditional fundamentalists, divided by the stronghold call morals. The fundamentalists were people who mostly lived in the rural areas of America. These fundamentalists believed the city was a trick from the devil, the streets are littered with drunks and people who would mongrelize the American race. They wanted the pure white protestant race to be the only successful race in America.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part of being human is discovering particular aspects in life. Arthur Miller states,” Betrayal is the only truth that sticks.” However it is not possible to recognize an isolated trait as being the only accepted truth. Betrayal is not the only truth that sticks, because mankind needs a strong bond that is established by family values, forgiveness, and morality.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Views on Moral Relativism Relativism is one of the main concepts of ethics. Most moral theorist relate to ethics within their articles that they had written, either being against moral relativism or being supporters. Throughout Mary Midgley’s article “Trying Out One’s New Sword,” she argues about the problems that are related to moral relativism. Another philosopher, John Arthur wrote an article “Religion, Morality and Conscience,” which also addresses the issue of relativism from the perspective of foundationalism.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Each society has their own code, therefore “there is no objective standard that can be used to judge one society’s code better than another” (161). When it comes to moral codes in a society, these codes do not take president outside of their specific society. Ethics is usually defined as the “branch of philosophy that deals with how we ought to live with the idea of the good, and with concepts such as “right” and “wrong” (1). Within ethics there is said to be no “universal truth”, because each society moral codes varies. Individuals should not judge others moral codes because they are different.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is the belief that each culture defines their own morality and because of this we should not judge a cultures morality because one is not better than the other. Acceptance is a strength of relativism, because it could promote the idea that we are all different and we should all accept each other for who we are. Another of its strengths is allowing people to choose a moral code to live by and not be subjected to one way of thinking. However there are some downsides to relativism, for example promoting intolerance. Intolerance promoted due to the fact that if a culture is committing genocide relativists say that we are not allowed to judge them because that might just be a part of their culture.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “It’s true to me” is considered a moral relativism, “It’s true for me, if I believe it.” A view that ethical and moral standards, and positions on what is right or wrong are all based upon culture. In turn, this means that decisions and thoughts are based upon individual choice. Unfortunately, this thought process has become widely accepted as the primary philosophy regarding morality of thought in modern society. This acceptance is important in the fact that our culture previously followed a more “Judeo-Christian” morality view.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays