Introduction The engineering case studies presented in the fictional video provides profoundly different sets of ethical issues that are presented at various manufacturing companies that want to put up hurriedly manufacturing chemical plants. Engineering profession, just like in many other professions is confronted with many ethical responsibilities. The study is exceptionally important to the practicing engineers since it presents viewers with ethical guidelines that should be followed when undertaking any engineering work in the community and the codes of ethics that become an integral part in guiding their decision-making process. The study ‘Incident at Morales’ present’s market-based competition among two competing companies. In the video,
…show more content…
In his view, he considered alloy pipes, which ordinarily had a shorter life span as compared with stainless pipes. Also, alloy plastic pipes despite being environmentally unfriendly would require huge maintenance costs. One of the engineers, Peter stated “….these projections and connections that concern me. They are hardly realizing specs on the exhaustion and brittleness assessment.” In response, Phaust engineering representative, Fred seems not concerned by Peters’ concerns when he responds that “Let us presume it is a maintenance concern, an operational accountability. The couplings and flanges are less expensive, and their replacement should not be too …show more content…
As evident from tension in the dysfunctional communication in speaking out ethical issues surrounding the engineering work, the company has an alternative to foster freedom from speech for everyone to speak out what he feels is supposed to be done. No such people should be undermined from free speech.
Seeking additional assistance In line with EPA regulations, Phaust company representatives and more profoundly Walley and Fred Martinez have an obligation to review engineering standards that are consistent with sustainable engineering practices. Alternatively, all the company representatives who were environmentally concerned are obligated by engineering codes of conducting a review of engineering codes and standards, which are explicit for environmental protection. There is a need to seek review of procurement processes that are not followed when Chuck identified his brother-in-law association with L&L as paramount to determine what must be made to acquire the much-needed resources securely for the Mexican plant. Fred’s role in procurement process should be reviewed because of his likely stakes in Chemitoil
In his view, he considered alloy pipes, which ordinarily had a shorter life span as compared with stainless pipes. Also, alloy plastic pipes despite being environmentally unfriendly would require huge maintenance costs. One of the engineers, Peter stated “….these projections and connections that concern me. They are hardly realizing specs on the exhaustion and brittleness assessment.” In response, Phaust engineering representative, Fred seems not concerned by Peters’ concerns when he responds that “Let us presume it is a maintenance concern, an operational accountability. The couplings and flanges are less expensive, and their replacement should not be too …show more content…
As evident from tension in the dysfunctional communication in speaking out ethical issues surrounding the engineering work, the company has an alternative to foster freedom from speech for everyone to speak out what he feels is supposed to be done. No such people should be undermined from free speech.
Seeking additional assistance In line with EPA regulations, Phaust company representatives and more profoundly Walley and Fred Martinez have an obligation to review engineering standards that are consistent with sustainable engineering practices. Alternatively, all the company representatives who were environmentally concerned are obligated by engineering codes of conducting a review of engineering codes and standards, which are explicit for environmental protection. There is a need to seek review of procurement processes that are not followed when Chuck identified his brother-in-law association with L&L as paramount to determine what must be made to acquire the much-needed resources securely for the Mexican plant. Fred’s role in procurement process should be reviewed because of his likely stakes in Chemitoil