In the following lines, I will discuss about whether or not birth control is morally right for women to use. I will begin with the relevant ethical factors raised in this particular case, then I will continue with further information about this case in order to form a moral judgement of this ethical issue. Furthermore, I will chose the best solution considering the moral principles and values raised by this case.
The main ethical factor raised in this case is that birth control goes against natural law. Many people, including the Pope, think that birth control is not natural. It is morally wrong to interfere with the natural order of the universe. The fundamental moral principle raised in this case is the fact that every woman should be allowed …show more content…
This organization try to show everyone benefits when women have access to affordable birth control, despite the fact that some politicians try to take this benefit away (Planned Parenthood Federation). I think that every woman should have access to birth control without cost being an issue. Also, there are many advantages of using birth control, first by using it, women are protected from any sexualy transmitted disease. Furthermore, birth control has a high success rate, which is very important since the main reason of using it is to avoid unwanted …show more content…
Since this idea is to hold back from doing the sexual act during a woman’s period of fertility, it does not go against the natural functioning of our bodies (Burnor and Raley 203). However, according to Pope John Paul II, sex is not an act that couple should do for pleasure. He mentions that birth control is morally wrong for couple to use, as sex should be only use as an act of creation and nothing else (Burnor and Raley 203). Therefore, morally speaking, this type of natural birth control does not work against nature, hence this solution would be acceptable. Also, this solution does respect the moral judgement, which is to respect a woman’s choice. The ethical theory that applies to this case is probably ethics of care, since this case is concerned with the types of relationships that a woman has with her partner or
The main ethical factor raised in this case is that birth control goes against natural law. Many people, including the Pope, think that birth control is not natural. It is morally wrong to interfere with the natural order of the universe. The fundamental moral principle raised in this case is the fact that every woman should be allowed …show more content…
This organization try to show everyone benefits when women have access to affordable birth control, despite the fact that some politicians try to take this benefit away (Planned Parenthood Federation). I think that every woman should have access to birth control without cost being an issue. Also, there are many advantages of using birth control, first by using it, women are protected from any sexualy transmitted disease. Furthermore, birth control has a high success rate, which is very important since the main reason of using it is to avoid unwanted …show more content…
Since this idea is to hold back from doing the sexual act during a woman’s period of fertility, it does not go against the natural functioning of our bodies (Burnor and Raley 203). However, according to Pope John Paul II, sex is not an act that couple should do for pleasure. He mentions that birth control is morally wrong for couple to use, as sex should be only use as an act of creation and nothing else (Burnor and Raley 203). Therefore, morally speaking, this type of natural birth control does not work against nature, hence this solution would be acceptable. Also, this solution does respect the moral judgement, which is to respect a woman’s choice. The ethical theory that applies to this case is probably ethics of care, since this case is concerned with the types of relationships that a woman has with her partner or