Two Arguments Against Ethical Egoism

Improved Essays
Ethical egoism varies from other ethical positions since it proposes that the enthusiasm of others anything to never be an element in good choice making. An ethical egoist accepts that helping others is not an ethical activity and that they anything to help other people just seeing that it would offer an advantage over the long haul. If it does not better me I “morally” do not have to do it. So, if killing, torturing, or robbing someone will help me better myself then morally right. The book claims that ethical egoism cannot be true because it requires killing rape, or theft just because actions of this promote self- interest.
The story of the stockbroker for example if you have such knowledge about a company that is about to have a corporate
…show more content…
No theory can be true if they logically contradict themselves if (A) Stops (C) From burning down his home for the insurance money then (A) is stopping (C) from doing what he ought to do to benefit him. At the same time ethical egoism is both wrong and not. not our duty to serve starving people but said to be our moral duty. wrong to prevent someone from doing their duty even if it is wrong but then denies the ethical egoism of it. But from a egoist point of view the question would be would it be right for the person to stop them from doing what was morally right to them would it benefit them in any way. “Plato thought he could do it. He tried to show that those who are unjust are always harmed because of their injustice.” He argued with most high of dictators, about how they control and secure such a great amount in this world, are still destined to lives. Even though they were knowledgeable about the amount of fun they were having, they felt deep down hopeless, always dreadful and frail, driving lives filled with nervousness and suspicion. “Once we see what an immoral life is like, then we will realize that we are far better off being …show more content…
Having motivation to do things just if there is something in it for us. It would be unreasonable, for example, to sacrifice your own prosperity in the event that you don 't received anything consequently for such sacrifice. At whatever point we are ethically required to accomplish something, doing it must advance self-interest. This is exactly what moral prideful people accept. In the event that you compelled by a sense of honor to accomplish something, don 't you have a justifiable reason motivation to take after what is correct. It is difficult to uncertainty that there are convincing motivations to secure your own particular advantages. On the off chance that some activity guarantees you no addition, yet just misfortune, then what reason is there for you to be that right? unreasonable to sacrifice your interests without the guarantee of some repaying benefit. It may be chivalrous to surrender one 's life for an outsider or to relinquish one final chance at bliss with the goal that others may appreciate life. In any case, reason can 't require such sacrifice. Your own perspectives are that best contention for moral selfishness is at last

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ethical egoism is a moral theory focused on improving a person’s well-being. There are many arguments for ethical egoism such as the self reliance argument and the best argument for ethical egoism, both presented by Shafer-Landau in The Fundamentals of Ethics. However, in this paper I will discuss how objections presented by Shafer-Landau and Dr. Thomas Carson are fatal to ethical egoism, while keeping in mind arguments for ethical egoism. I will discuss objections such as ethical egoism permitting or sometimes requiring murder, theft, or rape, in order to promote oneself’s well-being, egoists subconscious belief of their lives being more important than others, and an argument presented in class that if egoists must do what is best for their…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Claiming that the benefits of living in a society based on people’s rights and interest is a greater advantage then living without them. Even if you feel you could get away with it, an ethical egoist would claim it is too great a risk and will maintain the sort of society which they will benefit. The problem with this is that an ethical egoist cannot benefit in a world based on people’s rights if everyone also adopts the same way of thinking. How can you benefit from others if they are only out for themselves as well? In my eyes this is a world of chaos and cannot be adopted universally.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A. Utilitarianism seeks to maximize good by minimizing harm to all while egoism seeks to maximize good by keeping the individual happy. As ethical egoism holds that moral conduct ought to be judged through self-interest. Egoism states that the good consequences for the individual agent outweigh the consequences placed upon…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the critique “Egoism and Altruism,” Louis P. Pojman strongly rejects the idea of Ayn Rand that everyone should have and egoist morality by explaining the “false dilemma” created between egoism and altruism. He explains that her idea of egoism stating that she believes “selfishness is a virtue and altruism is a vice.” He argues that while some egoist traits are morally necessary, such as self-love and self-interest, they should not be brought about or acted upon at the cost of someone else’s happiness. The idea that one ought to “love thy neighbor as yourself” means to treat everyone with the same respect and dignity that you treat yourself with, not to harm a stranger for your own happiness or joy. He argues against Rand’s theory by stating…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A truly selfish person would not be bothered to seek the pleasure of an honorable conscience. Take your reluctant tutor, for example; by desiring the welfare of his friend, he derives satisfaction from the selfless fulfillment of the deed, not by the feeling of pleasure as the sole object of desire…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Landau’s book, The Fundamentals of Ethics, Chapter seven focuses on psychological egoism. The backbone of this theory is that all human actions are driven by human’s egotistical desires. Landau defends this theory by stating, “Psychological egoism is a theory about human motivation: it tells us that our only motivation is to make ourselves better off.” (Landau 106) This means in order for someone to adopt this theory they must believe that even trivial events that seem very altruistic are in fact somehow spawned from an egotistical mindset. Landau explains, “…altruism—the direct desire to benefit others for their own sake without any ulterior motive—does not exist.”…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ayn Rand is most known for her belief that people shouldn't care about the other people; She refers to this an ethical egoism, she believes that people who rely on others or the government are “ looters” and “moochers”, and at most I kind of agree but in the end I found myself mostly disagreeing with her on her point of view. In my opinion, I Believe it is in human nature to care about the others and that yeah, we should care about ourselves as well, but we need to treat others the way we want to be treated. Ethical egoism is an absurd form of saying one is selfish and they Ayn…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ego is defined as a person’s sense of self-esteem or self-importance. Humans with an egocentric nature tend to believe they are better than the society around themselves, thus they have a lack of respect and empathy for others thoughts and beliefs. In society, the word ego has a negative connotation, and is seen as the root of many problems in human interactions.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical egoism is the idea that people have moral obligations only to themselves and that they ought to pursue their own ends exclusively. An ethical egoist would say that one has no duty to help others in need unless doing so happens to coincide with one's own needs. Because ethical egoism prescribes actions, it is distinct from psychological egoism (discussed in the previous selection by Joel Feinberg), which is a descriptive claim about the nature of people's motivations. Rachels provides several arguments both for and against ethical egoism. The first argument for ethical egoism is that we actually harm other people by looking out for their interests.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that people who should be considered to be altruistic are those who act magnanimously to those outside of their family or general social group. I will use examples such as kin selection, animal altruism, and arguments against psychological egoism to assist in proving my thesis to be true. I will also address a counter argument made by some psychological egoists who believe that due to most people feeling pleasure while doing good things for others, that there are no people only act selfishly. I will reference James Rachel ’s essay “Psychological Egoism” to help enhance my theory that not all acts must be out of self interest.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The theory of ethical egoism would say “The morally right act, for any particular situation, is the act that will produce the greatest amount of utility for oneself” as quoted from the book Ethical Choices (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). Ethical egoism would also make the argument that the theory is not as selfish as it may seem there is nothing that prohibits someone from helping another person out, as long as the action produces utility for the person that is completing the action (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). According to ethical egoism their theory shows a great deal of selflessness and focuses on what most people would consider morally acceptable. Ethical egoists claim that their theory is selfless because we can still help people as long as the action supports our own interest. Kant has an idea that the morally correct action is the thought of moral duty.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It allows altruism when it benefits one's self. John would only keep the promise if it were in his best interest to do so. Ayn Rand is a philosopher who promotes ethical egoism. She explains that everyone's goal should be happiness,…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Midterm Question 1 Egoism can be defined as a person’s tendency to act or decide on moral issues solely based on an exaggerated concern of selfishness. In the criminal justice system, egoism can certainly lead to breaches of ethical behavior as an egoist person acts by simply overlooking anyone else’s needs. Some authorities who may be willing to act immorally and although they are aware that their actions are unethical, they would only want to satisfy their self interest needs as motivation for their behavior. The utilitarianism theory would be the opposite of the term egoism as this ethical standard focuses on actions that will positively affect most people, not only an individual. In other words, problems caused by egoism in the justice…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Egoism: Egoism is the ethical viewpoint that looks only for value as it pertains to you. This value system literally states that it is best to be selfish and only look out for what is good for you. The idea behind egoism is that if everyone acts only for their best interest, then the world becomes a better and more relatable place to live in. From this viewpoint, it is better to extend our lives using any means necessary than to do anything else.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, ethical egoism states that an individual should always act in their own best interest. Ethical egoism is based on the belief that people should act in a way that brings maximum benefits to the individual in making a decision. It also states that the behavior of the individual is to maximize their own self interest and effect on other people is of much less consequences. For instance, those government officials such as LTA officers receives bribe instead of charging the motorist for over speeding or drinking and driving just for their own benefits. They use the same money to buy the lunch or gifts for their family members.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays