Even if the use of euthanasia would produces some form of happiness The question is,, will it still produce the same amount when repeated several times after? According to the rule utilitarianism if an act of suicide is done repeatedly to the point in which it reaches an extreme percentile it will to cause more harm to society than relief. And if so, the act should be deemed as it not morally right. However for it to be viewed corrected in the eyes of a utilitarian there must be enough suicides done over a period of time for it be deemed as the norm.
The question still stands, how does one justify whether or not assisted suicide is morally right or morally wrong? On what grounds is it measured , to determine whether it is or whether it isn 't ? Kundera argued that are animals given the chance to die with their dignity intact but for a human the option is not offered. However, a utilitarian would argue that an animal doesn 't have the freedom of deciding whether they wanted to die or to live because they are not able to rebel against their nature instincts. But, as humans we are the masters of our faith and still that choice doesn’t seem to be available to