The Pros And Cons Of The Cloning Of Extinct Animals

Superior Essays
A scientist is hard at work in his lab, working with a single hair of the extinct woolly mammoth. The well preserved DNA was a success in itself for the scientist, making his mission possible. He plans to make another copy of the woolly mammoth with the help of its DNA and its close relative, the elephant. The possibilities with the perfection of his work are endless. The world will not be ready for his great feat. This is the very near future. This is the cloning of extinct animals. This is de-extinction. The idea of bringing back extinct animals has always been an idea of wonder to the world. With films like Jurassic Park showing the revival of the extinct dinosaur species brought back by cloning, the idea is not new, but also not something …show more content…
Is the cloning of extinct animals ethical? Should extinct animals be cloned just because it is possible and it would be cool (Sumner and Carey)? Should the cloning of extinct animals be accepted as an ethical procedure for the revival of extinct species? These are just a few questions that people bring up who are against cloning. Many people are against reviving extinct animals through any methods at all. However, others see the positive side to possibly ending extinction and bringing back ancient members of the world for a second chance. Both sides bring convincing …show more content…
The universe is constantly changing, with and without the help of science. Science is a broad term but advances and improvements in the science community will always be there to further enhance and bring aid to the lives of humans, and the species that planet Earth is shared with. Scientific advancement has always brought more knowledge to the world. Ethics refers to the moral principles of what is right and wrong, and that can be an issue in the world of science, specifically biology. Bioethics is an interesting topic, since so many people have different stances on the ethics of experiments, procedures, and research in order to scientifically advance. Cloning extinct animals and bringing them back to this world will open a window of possibilities and show that anything could be possible with time. “Species brought back from extinction will be beacons of hope”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    But cloning extinct animals is a no man lane. Human will play god by creating this creature. Many articles in fact has stated that extinct animal would be exploited to human purposes such as zoo or there body parts to be sold. Not only are human going to exploit them but genetical modified their appearance or mix two kind of different species making news ones. Not only is this wrong but creating new creature from scratch can cause some complication and more stronger and resistance creature to viruses and weapons.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, de-extinction possibly will change priorities for medical researchers. This would not be good because these researchers will be worrying more about bringing back already extinct animals, rather than worrying about keeping alive humans and animals already living today. De-extinction remains unnecessary. Although it possibly will provide a few benefits and seeing a real live wooly mammoth or…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    David Haussler, a cofounder of the project to bring back extinct animals, stated, “There’s always this fear that somehow, if we do it, we’re going to accidentally make something horrible, because only nature can really do it right. But nature is totally random. Nature makes monsters. Nature makes threats” (Rich, 2014). I find this important because although there are fears about the creation of something dangerous, harmful organisms are most likely created every day in a natural…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    De-extinction aims to resurrect a single charismatic species, yet millions of species are threatened to become extinct. According to Stewart Pimm, a world leader in the studies of biodiversity and conservation biology, de-extinction is worse than a waste (Pimm). He says that by setting up the expectation that science and biotechnology can fix any damage that we are doing to the planet’s inhabitants, we will begin to worry less about the true destruction that we are causing. We cannot make a mess of the only…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a reason humans are the dominate species on Earth. We are designers, we invent to make our life easier and after so many inventions there is always one that stands out to make a new generation. From the beginning, with fire and stone all the way to the age of trains and steel. Maybe our next stop is creating a perfect human with the use of genetic modification. Scientific advances in genetically modifying humans is either going to make a new age, or is going to destroy our humanity; this issue is creating an uproar in the scientific community.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Designer Babies

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The overall view of the human genome project has been one of great excitement and positive press, but there are people who have concerns that are quite reasonable, and they are frightened of the things they don 't understand” - Thomas R. Cech. Cech’s quote refers to the new discoveries in biotechnology. Many have heard the phrase before; does ‘designer babies’ ring a bell? It might, since it has been a very controversial topic in the science world. Many scientists believe altering the genes in human embryos to eliminate diseases is beneficial to society.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He finally finds the process of bringing the dead back to life and creates what he thinks and hopes will be a superhuman, very beautiful and very intelligent. Animal testing is one of the scientific experiments going on currently that is very controversial. Doctors and Scientists use new products and new vaccinations on these animals to develop better and safe products for human use and to help cure incurable diseases. These people hope to extend the human life and to take away the pain and suffering of humans. On the other hand, many think it’s inhuman to test on animals who have no other goals in life than to eat and find shelter.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas you have presented, however, are the best and most scientifically grounded ideas we have about the way species evolve and change. Especially considering you developed these ideas without the understanding and knowledge of genetics and molecular biology. But still, you have managed to develop a set of laws explaining the evolution of species, which later became the backbone of biology. Impressive. You have made one of the most important contributions to the science of evolution; your concept of natural selection.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People continue to study these dinosaurs to discover new things that other scientists have over looked in the past. The scientists that study dinosaurs these want actual proof of the actions and behavior of the T. Rex. This will help them discover new things about other dinosaurs as well because many of these creatures share common behaviors and activities. It was thought that the Tytannosaurus rex were existing by themselves in the world, that they were fending for themselves, each dinosaur for themselves, and that they…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People have been pushing for bans like the great ape research ban, which pushes to ban the use of non-human great apes in research. Others seek to ban stem cell research because of how embryonic cells are obtained. In 1995 the Dickey-Wicker Amendment was passed as an attempt to limit funding to stem cell researchers. Megan Kearl explains the Dickey-Wicker amendment is “restricting the use of federal funds for creating, destroying, or knowingly injuring human embryos.” (Kearl). By having this law in place, researchers would have limited funding and it would discourage stem cell research, but this law does not prohibit private companies from continuing stem cell research.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays