It is almost inevitable for there to be no dissension within the jury room. In the case of R V Orgles , there was a conflict between the jury and two jurors made a complaint to the judge. The approach of the judge addressing the two jurors without the presence of the others was held to be wrong. It is important for other jurors to be aware of the situation for them to act accordingly. As it is an internal matter, within the jury, the ability to carry out their function as a collective body will be at risk. Or else it will result in biasness and pressure which are not seen to be operative.
