The jurors had several conflicts when disagreeing, power and intimidation along with tense exchange of words and having over usage of tones over one another. Mainly, transference of anger ethical of virtue to occurring when the “12 Angry Men’ misunderstood one another. Although the film has a blatant simplicity the 12 men debate the fate of a young defendant charged with murdering his father. Since majority of the jurors held an alliance by voting guilty through persuasion to hurry the case move along to proceed on with their lives. While juror 7 wanting to attend a baseball game being more imperative than ensuring the evidence the prosecutor or the defense attorney, had learned of the evidence basically through second-handed non-creditable
