Moral Theory: Kantian Ethics

Kantian ethics is deontological, in terms of moral theory. Due to that fact, Kantian ethics does not consider the consequences of an action but on whether it fulfills one's duty defined in the categorical imperative. Imperatives are forms of command; in this case, Kantian ethics abides by the categorical imperative which is defined as an objective that is rationally necessary and an unconditional principle that we must always take after in spite of any common wishes or slants we may have. All particular good prerequisites as indicated by Kant are defended by this standard, which implies that every single indecent activity is nonsensical in light of the fact that they abuse the categorical imperative. The ethical dilemma lies in whether perfect …show more content…
The ethical dilemma lies in whether downloading music can be construed as right or wrong. However, it is impossible to do the figuring that Utilitarianism requires in light of the fact that consequences are inherently unknowable. Besides that, Utilitarians base their ethics and moral reasoning on the belief that people should attempt to promote the greatest good or the most favorable consequences for the greatest number of people and on the basis of preventing pain and promoting pleasure, as well as other values such as friendship and knowledge. They evaluate a wide range of things that involve choices that people …show more content…
If one has the intention to steal music from those who produce it, then it is a vice to steal when this act affects many negatively and has a history of negative consequences. It is then ethically incorrect to download music illegally based on these rules. Following the principles of virtue ethics, one will have to clearly define their virtues to develop a clearer understanding of possible consequences to determine if a Utilitarian would defer their ethical decision from Kantians. The ethical dilemma lies in the personal definition of good versus bad in downloading music. Whether one follows consequentialist idea or strict moral rules, it is within debate whether any behavior is proper conduct. Within the concept of Utilitarian ethics there are two subsets, ‘Act Utilitarianism’ and ‘Rule Utilitarianism’. Act Utilitarianism concentrates on the impact of individual activities, while Rule Utilitarians concentrate on the impacts of sorts of activities. Both Act Utilitarians and Rule Utilitarians concur that our general point in assessing activities ought to be to make the most ideal results, yet they contrast about