Ethical Differences Between Civil Disobedience And Just Laws

Improved Essays
Not everyone has that luxury of living under reasonable, fair, and just laws. Civil disobedience has occurred throughout history for a wide variety of reasons. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it does not. People partake in civil disobedience in an attempt to change the way society views certain laws because they are passionate that change needs to be made. When done peacefully, civil disobedience can positively impact society.
Martin Luther King Jr. broke laws, norms, and customs, but we do not view him as a crazy criminal. We view him as a leader and a hero. He fought for rights and equality, and we admire that. We applaud his dedication and his ability to persuade. He actually did get grounded, spending time in jail. He knew that was a very real possibility, but because he felt so strongly towards his cause, he took the chance. Martin Luther King Jr. spoke saying, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” It is important to note that there is a difference between just and unjust laws. Martin Luther King was fighting unjust laws because they were laws that degraded and treated people unfairly. We have the
…show more content…
We have the right to protest the unjust regulations and bring our concern to the surface. We, as a society, are not able to adequately function when we lack the ability to express concern and contempt. As citizens, we are suppose to have the freedom of speech, religion, press, the right to assemble, and the right to petition the Government. These were obviously important to our founding fathers, and they are still important today. Still, it is important to use these powers in a peaceful, respectful manner. What made the Civil Rights Movement so powerful was the commitment to stay peaceful. It was powerful because there were strong leaders behind it, and they were able to unite the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The opinions of the minority are not always right; neither are the opinions of the majority always right. Therefore, both sides must receive an equal chance to express their ideas. The presence of legal systems for attending to matters of unfair legislations does not necessarily ensure that such matters would be attended. Undeniably, it would be illogical to believe that the government would be quick to improve its own disorder yet it neglected to identify the disorder to begin with; civil disobedience is essential. Additionally, civil disobedience may be set aside as the pis aller but this would defer justice and consequently form a bigger issue (Lefkowitz 212).…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. are radical men who stood up for what they believed in even though they knew that the repercussions could be very bad. Both men wrote successful provocative political statements by using effective rhetorical strategies to capture their audience’s attention and get their point across. The intended outcome of both letters was to make a change, and that is what happened, so both men were successful because they reached their goals. It is evident that they were successful because today we are not under the tight control of England and African Americans are treated significantly better then they were during the time of Dr.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He stood up for what he believed in, and was not deterred from his beliefs when he was threatened with jail time. He encouraged people to do the same. He felt that the Government was corrupt and didn't deserve his taxes. Martin Luther King also said that you should stand up for what you believe in. King was arrested for participating in sit-in at luncheon counters.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perspective 1: Disobedience One, seemingly contradictory, thing Martin Luther King, Jr was passionate about was disobedience. Particularly disobedience when it comes to unjust laws. This is contradictory due to the nature of King’s work and mission in creating peace and unity amongst black and white individuals. In Letter from Birmingham Jail, he states, “I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Dr. Martin Luther King’s letter from Birmingham city jail as well as Henry David Thoreau’s civil disobedience shows how we should all practice civil disobedience for justice and to right an unjust law or action. Which bring up the question of whether civil disobedience is effective or ineffective in achieving change? Based on history we see civil disobedience is an effective way to achieve change in democratic countries. Civil disobedience can only work in a democratic country because in a democracy the government gains all its power from the people. In the case of dr. martin Luther king, he executed a nonviolent movement with thousands of fellow citizens to achieve change.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With this, he also says, “privileged groups seldom give up their privileges” (Letter from Birmingham City Jail). Martin Luther King Jr. fought very hard for something he strongly believed in. MLK fought for himself as well as many others around him. He benefits from helping others. Letter from Birmingham City Jail teaches that if you stand up for what you believe in, things can change.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we take a look at the history of the United States, impacting a free society has not been easy. There have been many laws that have not treated everyone fairly. In order to impact a free society, many had to undergo civil disobedience in order to impact the free society that we live in today. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. Without civil disobedience, it would have been almost impossible to make change in our society.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty” -Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. argues in “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” that it is our duty to break a law if it is unfair. King advocates disobeying a country’s prejudice laws in order to avoid immorality. Similarly, Henry David Thoreau argues in “Civil Disobedience” that if a law requires a person to be unjust to another, they should break it.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He said in his letter from Birmingham “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” He understood it wasn't enough to just have equal rights in his hometown that to make a difference and to make something last he had to have fight for fight for freedom everywhere. Martin Luther King also said “groups tend to be more immoral than individuals” the states were grouping up and doing injustice but he knew that within the individual they knew what was right and it was changing the mindset of the states. Martin Luther King saw spreading civil rights as important as spreading the gospel which a lot of whites at that time agreed with he said “so am i compelled to carry…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this was to continue, then perhaps the people who would decide to fight against the immoral actions should find another way to combat it. Another reason that civil disobedience could be used, but probably should not is if every single person were to try and protest each minute issue, then deciding what would be important to change could result in not having any change at all (Thoreau). When a governing body is overtaxed, it has to decide which issues are more timely and which are not. Overstimulating the governing bodies with requests -- while peaceful -- could result in hazardous…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, personally, believe that civil disobedience is extremely effective and in the end produces a positive effect. In order for the movement to be effective, it has to directly affect a group or several groups of people. When these people feel that their rights or interests aren't being protected or violated, then they make a stand. Those who are gaining from their demise view these people with criticism or call their movement useless or a "threat to society." Back in the 1800s Henry David Thoreau wrote Civil Disobedience.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It raises awareness and sparks progress for important issues when used in a responsible, proportional manner. However, It is important to be an upstander when it comes to defending human rights. If the rights of one group is infringed upon, that lays the groundwork for rights to be stolen from all members of society. Once human rights violations begin and are accepted by people, an unstoppable ball is that will inevitably roll over every person in a community is set into motion. Civil disobedience is an extremely effective method of insuring that this ball remains stationary and the infringement of rights is not simply…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert O’Connor Concord High School New Hampshire Like many things in life, civil disobedience, is all a matter of perspective. Whether it be the Great Muhammad Ali peacefully opposing his selection for the draft or Rosa Parks literally sitting down instead of standing up for what is right on a bus ride home, each and every case of civil disobedience has its ups and downs. Though, when talking about basic human rights, there is no room to be neutral, and that is why peaceful resistance to laws most certainly impacts a society positively. From an optimistic perspective, everything will be alright in the end. Despite Ali’s…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was an effective action that he helped take for the Civil Rights. He also acted in other nonviolent action to make a greater crisis, and to establish a creative tension to constantly negotiate the forces of an issue. This action that Martin Luther King Jr. took helped him gain people’s attention and to stand up for what they believed for the greater good. This is how he used his very strong and effective actions into making the Civil Rights have a stronger effectiveness for the lives of many different African Americans in one’s nation (Schuman,…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Am I jus for my disobedient acts? I must be jus for each one that I have ever committed. Civil disobedience is a fracture within the law therefore there must a relishable reason to be disobedient. Yet the reason to go against the state would be due to negligence. Justice is associated with the concept of everything plays a natural role, coming from Feinberg and Gross.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays