Difference Between Honesty And Beneficence

Improved Essays
In term to discuss Dr. Bill case, there are many ethical concepts, but I will identify the two main ethical principles in it, honesty and beneficence.
First of All, honesty is the act of telling the truth. Dr. Bill in the case was missing the term and the concept of honesty in his practice, because he has been diagnosed with Parkinson disease but he decided to keep it secret. Practicing medicine in a professional way require from the physician in the first place to maintain honesty. That means they should be honest with themselves, colleagues and the most important to be honest with the patient. Honesty is the base of the relationship between the patient and the doctors, that’s what makes the doctor a qualified one. Dr. Bill didn’t maintain
…show more content…
Benefit the patient can be by relief suffering, prevent a disease or cure it. In this case Dr. Bill didn’t follow this ethical principle in his practice and that makes him unprofessional. The fact that he is diagnosed with Parkinson might hinder him from making a diagnosis because it can impair his physical examination skills. As we saw in the case, because of the tremor it was difficult for him to palpate the patient. I believe that doctors job is to provide the patient better physical and mental health, improving quality of life and they are not there for only earn money. Dr. Bill’s patient mention about his mood status, how it changes from a joyful person to the opposite, this can also cause tension between the doctor and his patient. Balancing beneficence and non-maleficence is a bit challenging, for example, when the doctor decides that this particular medication or operation can benefit the patient and make him live longer with better health, how to measure that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages and how this can be not harmful. Managing those can solve the hardest equation in …show more content…
He asked for amputation and the surgeon perform for him the operation so he can consider himself as a complete after that. So do we consider what the doctor done will benefit the patient and it will not harm him? A conflict arises here, because if he keeps the leg he will keep suffering from it and if he amputate the leg, he is harming his body be removing a healthy functional limb. As I mentioned before, every case vary and each situation needs a deep thinking to deal with it the doctor rely upon the patient preference, the source of suffering because he believed that physical could be treated by medication but in this case he should amputate the leg to stop his suffering. The amputation also lead to a better quality of life of this specific patient, and the definition of quality of life varies from one person to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He decided he didn’t want to live his life, even before the treatment he was receiving. Also, a medical provider’s actions should benefit the patient in keeping them alive and healthy, meaning the actions of the physicians should cause no unnecessary harm to the patient. However, “physicians may feel that without full authority to make decisions, he or she should not assume responsibility for outcomes.” Without the authority from their own point of view, physicians cannot make decisions. If they had to ask the patient what kind of treatment he or she wants then it is hard for doctors to determine what cure is right for the patient. The doctors also said that life is valuable for them to save his life, but they still should have listened to Dax.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Pas

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By preventing clients from taking their life, healthcare providers are being paternalistic and imposing their views onto their patients” (de Vocht et al). Medical ethics lie on the base of consent of the patient, as well as discretion, judgment, and experience of the medical physician. Healthcare professionals should be able to make the judgment call to respect the patient 's wishes and put their best interest forward. “Should Doctors be Allowed” concludes that helping them to achieve a calm and peaceful end should be thought of as one of the best treatments for terminally ill patients. Overall, the patient’s wishes should be first and PAS should be legalized because this topic is a highly personal and situational decision, thus should not be deemed as unethical or illegal under…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These doctors could have had another doctor step in and allow Dax to die as he wished, but instead believed it was their duty to treat him and heal him. The doctors made their decisions based on virtue ethics, and because of that Dax’s life was…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone had to consult a professional, about ending their life due to a medical issue or something very personal, they didn’t know, it would be tough and scary for them. The patient would have to explain everything that they have gone through which wouldn’t be easy. If they had the option to could consult their doctor, it might be easier since the doctor would have been a major contender in the patient’s journey and understand what they had been through. It helps because they are a part of the full picture rather than looking in on the outside. Then there is the other side of the spectrum where if someone feels safer discussing with a mental health professional, then they have the option to talk with them.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The physician goal is intended only at moral advice avoiding intimidation and pressure at the patient’s right of medical treatment preference. Moe, although unaware of the real medical issue due to Diane’s manipulation of the sample tissue, provides the best moral informative dialogue to Howard Swensen and Mr. Calley. For Mr. Swensen, Dr. Moe gives full intimate details of his presumed condition and applies the deliberative model as to fully inform of his prostate cancer offering the choice to follow the required treatments needed to cure Swensen’s illness. Dr. Moe has a “backhander” type of discussion with his patient needs desires, knowledge information not considering his role of deliberative role model of…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a patient means that a person’s health is afflicted and is somewhat beyond the control of the patient seeking help from medicine. Cassell contradicts scholars that interpret this as a loss of autonomy and rather concludes that it is the patient that knows and experiences the suffering and therefore is entitled to express concerns and participate fully in whatever treatment. The physician’s job is to treat the patient and not the disease. However, this creates problems for physicians as in the case of the sculptor, the focus is the cancer and not the mental and social embarrassments associated with the treatment regime. The goal of the physicians, in this case, is to prevent the death of the patient- the avoidance of a premature death.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person knows for sure that they will not conquer their sickness then PAS could be a viable option to save their memory. I learned that patients have it tough when it comes to their will to live. People shouldn’t have to suffer when they know the end result is death. A psychologist isn’t completely necessary when it comes to assisted suicide, but I understand why one would be used if a person is having a mental breakdown. PSA decisions put psychologist in conflicting positions because they want to please their patient, but they don’t want to break an ethical code.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Assisted Suicide Analysis

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The AMA supports the removal of such devices because it allows the patient to take up the risk of dying that is part of the illness they have. The reason the AMA supports such actions, but they do not support assisted suicide is because when a doctor removes the breathing apparatus, he or she are not removing the devices with specific intent to kill the patient (Karaim, 2013, p. 457). Even though the American Medical Association does not support assisted suicide, some bioethicists believe that medical care needs to include and recognize that death is inevitable and physicians need to respect a patients wish at the end if their life. (Karaim, 2013, p.…

    • 1945 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is there less harm done to a patient by trying to fight a terminal illness with a slim chance of success or is there less harm done to a patient that comes to term with mortality and decides life to take its course? Most doctors might think that death is a failure and goes against their role of healers, but on the contrary, death is the natural order of life and trying to prolong life can do more harm than good. Atul Gawande, a general surgeon, said, “People with serious illness have priorities besides simply prolonging their lives. If your problem is fixable, we know just what to do. But if it’s not?…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, a physician’s duty to promote health isn’t their only duty because it would be ethically wrong for a physician to release a person from their care because there is no treatment for their illness. Someone with a terminal disease cannot be made healthy so the physicians main role would be to reduce suffering. However, the physician can only reduce suffering by ways that the person has consented. Opponents to PAS agree that physicians should reduce suffering of competent patients but state that reducing suffering should never be done with PAS because they believe a…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays