Firstly, distance learning may allow students get inappropriate assistance. Since there is no supervisor, students could easily fall into temptation of fraudulent act while they take a quiz or exam. According to Brown’s work, the statistical data for 2007 done by National Survey of Student Engagement show that as high as 59% of U.S students involved in eLearning programs admitted their fault of academic fraud. The respondent conceded that they cheated on their online class ‘very often’ and ‘often’, percentage of 27% and 32% respectively. He mentioned that students coming from secondary education often confuse the issue of collegiate ethics and academic integrity, particularly in online learning environment (Brown,
Firstly, distance learning may allow students get inappropriate assistance. Since there is no supervisor, students could easily fall into temptation of fraudulent act while they take a quiz or exam. According to Brown’s work, the statistical data for 2007 done by National Survey of Student Engagement show that as high as 59% of U.S students involved in eLearning programs admitted their fault of academic fraud. The respondent conceded that they cheated on their online class ‘very often’ and ‘often’, percentage of 27% and 32% respectively. He mentioned that students coming from secondary education often confuse the issue of collegiate ethics and academic integrity, particularly in online learning environment (Brown,