Ethical And Unethical: The Case Of Jeanette M.

Improved Essays
Abstract
Law is formed for a motive and it regulates in many areas like medicine, before practicing any medical procedure or conducting a form of administrative position each medical specialist or non-medical specialist operative must comprehend a difference between ethical or unethical. Ethical and Unethical plays a significant role in our humanity every way it is whether up to how you want to approach it. According to “The case of Jeanette M. And the phone call” altered from the beginning of chapter 1 of “Medical Law and Ethics” inscribed by Bonnie Fremgen, it exemplifies how a medical receptionist and the doctor action resulted in death of Jeanette M. This case falls into so many categories of violations and code of ethics such as being
…show more content…
Signifies as ethical problem. In a real explanation, the medical receptionist should be train if any scenario come to an event such as an emergency they should know that a patient who’s in a life-threatening situation make them as their first priority. When Jeannette called the doctor’s office in the morning by explaining her symptom over the phone to medical receptionist that a patient was having trouble breathing. The receptionist vividly told Jeannette that since the doctor’s office was busy the doctor couldn’t speak to her so the receptionist told her that she would leave the message to the doctor but the message was never given to the doctor. However, what the medical receptionist was did it was unethical. “The healthcare team, composed of these professionals with the addition of healthcare administrator, often must decide on critical issues relating to patient’s needs” (Fremgen, 2015, pp .4). This assumption, in my point of view, what the medical receptionist was unethical and should have not held Jeanette symptom for several hours before sending the message and the receptionist should’ve been more attentive and put patients’ needs at the highest, who is in critical and life-threatening …show more content…
Fremgen. The author adapted the Three-Step Ethics Model by Kenneth Blanchard and Norman Peale. These three steps help you evaluate case when an ethical problem occurs. The first step Is it legal? The case of Jeanette is a legal and ethical problem. When Jeanette called the hospital regarding how she was having difficulty breathing and the receptionist failed to respond back to the doctor and Jeanette about the patient symptom so it was the receptionist and hospital responsibility to train every employee with policies and regulation since it failed to do so it can be conducted as a civil case. The second step Is it balanced? Yes, Jeanette case does have an advantage over the hospital and the receptionist. The patient called the office concerning about a life-threatening symptom instead of leaving Jeanette unseen she could’ve called the paramedics to check Jeanette places. The hospital does not have advantage over Jeanette case because most likely the hospital can be sued for not following the policy and regulation of not treating a critical patient as first priority. The third step How does it make me feel? From my perspective, I would think of this situation as what if it was one of my family member and it’s very sad to see a patient passing away the receptionist indulgency and careless act jeopardized Jeanette

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Each case is unique and has its own details as to how the alleged incident came into play. Therefore, each case needs to be analyzed in detail and reviewed before deciding who is at fault and to what degree they deserve to be punished. In the situation of “The Case of Jeanette M. and the Phone Call” adapted from chapter one of “Medical Law and Ethics” written by Bonnie Fremgen, it describes a medical situation that resulted in the death of an elderly women. The ethical and or legal issues in…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter four, titled Contracts and Intentional Torts, pertains to the various laws surrounding physician and patient relationships. A major case that is presented in the chapter pertains to a woman’s false imprisonment by a physician. The case is known as Stowers v. Wolodzko, and it outlines the physician’s rights versus a patient’s rights in a legal lawsuit. The case depicts the restriction of a person’s freedom, assault and battery, and malpractice.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Anna Pou Case Summary

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The medical ethics case on Dr. Anna Pou questions the ethics itself in several forms and different issues. The issue is that the medical departments, nationally or locally, should always provide care for patients no matter the type of emergency or disaster. It doesn’t matter the amount of laws and regulations they pass or provide to help medical institutions work easily and efficiently, which should help provide patients with medical care they rightfully deserve and need. In order to be able to successfully allow such difficult decisions to be made and acted upon such circumstances, such as the one occurred in Medical Memorial Hospital in New Orleans, they need to create clear and conscious laws that is workable and lawfully and medically ethical that the head and the staff of the medical institute can follow easily to avoid such situation in the future. As Dr. Pou has been trying to pass laws to help…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For instance, one of the patients on the second floor was moaning softly. The doctors and nurses asked what was wrong, but he was unable to respond because he was too ill (Fink, 2013, p. 292). This scene clearly shows a major communication barrier between the health care providers and the patient because the patient was not able to express what was wrong with him or her and the health care providers couldn’t understand what was wrong with him or her. Because of the communication barrier, an ethical issue was involved. During the crisis, a pulmonologist John Thiele gave patients high doses of morphine and midazolam.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5. What are the morally relevant facts? A fact that posed as misconduct is the lack in compassion and commitment from both the physician Dr. Evans and the employees at the medical clinic in the institution. Because of the fact that Dr. Evans failed to identify the lump in Tomcik’s breast as a result of a passively performed examination, he did not follow his obligation, as a physician, to deliver the high-quality care that patients should receive.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The codes of ethics are a principle of right and wrong. They play a vital role in medicine and are referred to as medical ethics. Medical ethics govern the medical profession by guiding physicians’ meet ethical challenges. The five most common types of ethical problems include ethical dilemma, ethical distress, the dilemma of justice, the locus of authority, and whistleblowing. The current ethical problem that is going to be discussed in this paper is an ethical dilemma.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most important information that needed to be identified before care started was Grace advanced care directive. More information was needed and The Director of Nursing, the Administrator, and the nursing staff should have gathered more information before making decision for more care. They should have checked Grace advanced care directive in her chart. The advanced directive may have stipulated that nothing extraordinary should be done in the event she was dying. The nursing staff did not think of Grace’s advanced directive when they started making plans about her care, to find out what was causing her illness and when they called her brother to get permission to take her to the community hospital.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel like I am missing some information that can be crucial in this case. On the one hand, it is unknown if Jeanette was previously ill or if she was under care of the physician for any condition. If she had a history of pulmonary or heart diseases and needed to be monitored by a doctor, the physician supposed to take this call as an emergency and get back immediately. Also, receptionist in this office should be instructed to bring to the doctor’s attention any call from a medically compromised patient. In this instance, the case can be present as a legal…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between a physician and their patient is one that should be composed of understanding and trust, as the intent of both parties is a shared value alleviating pain and overall content. However, there is uncertainty in the medical community when determining who “knows best” – the patient or the doctor. Is the patient entitled to the knowledge their doctor has concerning their case, or should the doctor be conservative in their explanations in an attempt to spare the patient’s psychological turmoil. This debate is exemplified in the article “Beneficence Today, or Autonomy (Maybe) Tomorrow” as the course of treatment for the patient, Monica, is reliant upon the doctors’ decision to either withhold information about the severity…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Analyzing the ethical case between Ms. Smith and Wesley helped me gain awareness of ethical dimensions and practices. When Ms. Smiths phone went missing she viewed Wesley as a disadvantaged citizen in an unjust society. The reading does not state that Wesley stole his teachers phone, but educational policies persuaded Ms. Smith to believe so. The dilemma arises when Ms. Smith has to determine whether to follow the zero-tolerance policy or report her phone missing to higher authority. Principles of the dilemma compete because of the values at stake, and Ms. Smith has to determine her line of action to prioritize her student over herself.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In society today, it is crucial for an individual, in the healthcare field, to be aware of other cultures and religions. With this said, it is important to practice cultural awareness and to practice a professional culture understanding. As future nurses, a key component of nursing education is to seek more knowledge about the patient’s culture to better help in caring for our patients. Anne Fadiman’s book, The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, allows the audience to relive the Lee’s story. They were a Hmong refugee family that sought treatment from the health care system in Merced, California.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On October 27, 1969 Tatiana Tarasoff was killed by Prosenjit Poddar. Tatiana Tarasoff’s parents (Plaintiffs) claim that Dr. Lawrance Moore (Defendant) and other therapists had the duty to warn Tatiana and parents of threats made by their patient, Prosenjit Poddar. They argue that two months earlier the Prosenjit Poddar had mentioned to Dr. Moore his intentions to kill Tatiana Tarasoff. Dr. Moore in fact did warn campus police about Poddar’s intentions and was detained briefly to be later released once he appeared rational. After, Dr. Harvey Powelson, Moore’s superior asked that no further action be taken to detain Poddar.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mildred’s caregiver called her doctor instead of the ambulance. Mildred needed immediate care considering she had a stroke. When the doctor calls the care for the elderly to admit Mildred, the man who answers the phone is not writing down anything the doctor is saying, he tries to open food during their conversation. The guy on the phone should have been concerned and writing down Mildred’s information. Also, the doctor says the patient is going to be there quite a while because he has seven other patients to see.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main purpose of André Picard’s article “Royal Hospital Scandal Shows Patient Privacy is a Matter of Ethics”, 2012, is to enforce laws and ethics. Among health care professionals and their supervisors who can enforce laws and ethics. That way individuals that are working in that setting are aware of the impact they have on their patients. The overall argument of this article is that there is a stigma between the professionals and the confidentiality the patients deserve. There are protocols that need to be followed by staff members even if close family members want certain information.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Explore the Issue Upon reviewing Laura Rivera’s ethical dilemma concerning Tyrone’s behavior as well as his parent’s harsh style of punishment, my first response would be to consult with the director of the program about my concerns. Meeting with the director will give insight on how to address Tyrone’s parents discipline style, not to mention, help me to organize my thoughts before I confront them (Artifact 1). Equally important I must identify the stakeholders in this dilemma, which are Tyrone, his classmates, his classmates’ families, his parents, his teachers, along with the director and other administrators of the center. Tyrone along with his family are obvious stake holders in this scenario since Tyrone is the child who is exhibiting…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays