Summary: Essentials Of Physical Anthropology

Improved Essays
How do we know what we know about human evolution? The scientific method is a process of methods that has portrayed natural science since the 17th century. In the book Essentials Of Physical Anthropology, by Clark Spencer Larsen, Larsen describes the scientific method as the foundation of science (Larsen 2016:14). In the following, I will explain the components/stages of the scientific method, as well as why it is never just a theory, and the difference between physical, and social science when applying the scientific method. The main component of the scientific method is the research question. Having the research question established you are able to achieve a proposed explanation on something based on available knowledge. To come up with …show more content…
In reality it is never just a theory. For scientist a theory is an explanation that ties up a lot of facts, making science credible and at times predictable. A theory is just the scientific prove, a theory should always be seen as open-ended. Further studying of a scientific case can bring improvements, and can also be disproven. For many a theory is just an idea that lives in people’s heads. We have to remember most scientific theories have a bunch of evidence and facts to back up there theory. For example in the documentary, one of the anthropologist came up with a hypothesis about the Miami holes being part of Mayan ruins, but at the moment everything was questionable and no theory had been proven (Anez 2013). Can a theory be questionable? The answer is yes. I find that the beauty of science. I would imagine we have an answer to everything, but in reality there are many aspects in science that have yet not been fully addressed. This also leads us to the question, is there room for heroes in science? I believe so; there are many people that dedicate their life to prove a new theory or disprove a theory. I also think that technology is helping many scientists, technology is the practical function of science. It also takes a lot of money to start an experiment and prove a theory. So even if there was is room for heroes, many scientist out there will at times never get their experiments completed. Whether you …show more content…
Anthropology is a perfect example of social science, the study of the humankind from the perspective of all people. Physical science has to do with the scientific method; always growing and changing as scientist curiosity explore new ideas. Theory would be part of physical science, and social science. The difference in social science theory and physical science theory is that social science theories are frameworks of evidence to study a social phenomenon. They both have distinctive objects of study, methodology and experimental philosophies, however the boundaries between both are not at times

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Albert Einstein Religion

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It is one of the greatest pieces of literature written by, yes I know its hard to believe, humans. Also study science for fun. As I said before, humans seek out truth, and what better way to do that by reading things we know as fact. Scientific research has given new insights to people all over the world and will continue to until the end of time. But, until we can understand that there should be no barrier between science and religion, we will be stuck as the…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowledge has made us aware of the scientific window but as Goodall questions in her essay what is beyond the science which, “The Big Bang theory is yet another example of the incredible, the awe-inspiring ability of the human mind to learn about seemingly unknowable phenomena in the beginning of time. Time as we know it, or think we know it. But what about before time? And what about beyond space?”(149). The majority of scientist believe in the Big Bang theory and evolution, but Goodall questions what happened before the Big Bang theory.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Empiricism

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It cannot be proven for sure like many other science theories, but it is always open to be disproved as time goes on and technology advances. Psychology has a lot of scientific reasoning behind it and should ,therefore be acknowledged by the scientific…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, the assumption that science will eventually be able to explain all there is to know about the human person, is not founded in complete fact. While yes, the track record of scientific growth is impressive, it is still not perfect and there are and will always be certain subjects that cannot be completely explained by science. This is in no way meant to degrade or diminish the ability of science to explain things, but rather is meant to state that science explains via cause and effect relationships. For science to justify a theory a fact, or to conclude accurate information in any fashion, a clear cause and effect relationship must be observed and confirmed via copious amounts of evidence. There are some things that cannot be completely explained via a cause and effect relationship.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Science

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The era that we’re in right now is the era of science. I believe science has done a great service to the world. We are rational and curious creatures who tend to explore the mysteries of the world. This exploration and wonder have led to many discoveries through science. Additionally, we are very unsatisfied creatures and are always looking for more in depth answers to mysteries that our current knowledge has touched upon.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Popper started by stating that, induction and empirical methods are the first step for identifying a scientific theory. Induction method involves generation of principles from particular facts whereas, empirical method involves generating idea based on experiments or an observation. Based on Popper’s beliefs, these two methods alone cannot differentiate between science and pseudo-science. So, Popper indicated that, the criteria for demarcation between science and Pseudo-science was an idea of falsifiability. Popper stated “One can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability” (Popper, K. 1962).…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Conflict

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As scientists learn more and more about their particular field, and others that may overlap, they find better theories that are able to explain certain phenomena. There is always more than one way to explain reality. Scientific theories are never 100% but scientists have been able to prove that other theories do not answer as many questions or are too complicated. The theories we consider to be true have been tested over and over and have yet been be proven false. There are always anomalies within a scientific paradigm, or normal science.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All science can do is give us, as humanity, more of an idea as to what goes on in our physical world; however, everything science can teach us is something that is open to debate and consternation. This includes one of the most often wholeheartedly believed and yet the most amazingly flawed scientific theories out there, this is Evolution. From it 's humble beginnings, to today, evolution…

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wolpert explains that much like science, there is a certain degree of similarity within the creative processes of art and science. Indeed, both require abstract ways of thinking in order to happen upon new discoveries or creations. Scientists are sometimes known to have eureka moments, or instances where a sudden clarity rushes to them, this is also true in art forms such as when artists suddenly gain inspiration. Differences between science and art arise in many areas as well. To elaborate, meaning in art is subjective or metaphorical, it is open to interpretation; whereas in science there is no room for this ambiguous interpretation, explanations must be concise and to the point with no room for argument about the meaning of a statement.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is what most people tend to assume, a scientist discovered a theory to explain a phenomenon, so surely it is correct. However, this is not always the case. In today’s time, of course we regard all our current popular theories as true, but time does tend to take a toll on this. The history of science provides us with countless examples of “scientific theories which were empirically successful in their day but later turned out to be false,” such as Earth-centered universe beliefs (Okasha 60). We won’t be around to know if our beliefs are the way things really are, and we can never know for sure what the future will discover.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays