Essay On Why Johnson Burned The Flag

Improved Essays
Some people would say that it would be a bad thing to treat the flag with disrespect and others would agree but not agree. This is all because of Johnson that burnt the United States flag in the state of Texas in a public place. I agree, that it was wrong for Johnson to burn the flag because it is the flag that symbolizes unity and freedom and to do that to it. It was also wrong because it was in a public place. But if some people would agree with Johnson because they believe that it was his freedom of speech. The reason that the court couldn’t do anything was that it was the First Amendment.
It was wrong that Johnson burnt the flag and that it means freedom and symbolizes unity and to do this it means that Johnson wouldn’t have cared that people died serving in the army. Even if he would have known that he is still disrespected to the men and the families that lost them. He should have thought of an
…show more content…
It could have caused harms to others, and this could have started a strike or riot because this could have upset some people and causing this outcome. If he did it somewhere else, he could have done it around any place that could cause harm and that could harm nature. He was lucky that nobody stood up and took action against that. Therefore, he shouldn’t have done it in a public place.
The reason why he wasn’t punished and was let free, is because the judges thought it was bad but people thought it was his freedom of speech and the judges couldn’t go against the first amendment. But they did everything they could to put him away for burning the flag. But they couldn’t so they let him go. Johnson should have got some time in jail at least and told that it was wrong for him to do anything to the United States flag. So even if he got in trouble and that nothing should happen like that without taking in account. He should have got some time or got into some kind of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Flag Burning

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most of all, I do not believe flag burning being outlawed will make people respect the flag more, or that it will stop flag burning. I think it will take respect away from the flag. If given the choice to burn or desecrate the flag the majority of American’s will not because they respect the values it stands for. If we the people are commanded to treat the flag in every way the government deems fit respect for the stars and stripes will be lost along the…

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is trying to make it so that burning the flag is criminal behavior, to the point where you can be punished, but what they need to understand is speech Limiting the freedoms of the bill of right does not make us more patriotic, but threatens our core belief system. Limiting the freedoms of the bill of right does not make us more patriotic, but threatens our core belief system, and lastly Our democracy is strong because we tolerate all peaceful forms of expression, no matter how uncomfortable they make us feel or how much we disagree. Initially, people dislike the idea of others disrespecting the nation when they do these acts, but contrary to that belief they are not disrespecting the nation at all. Instead they are respecting…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, people argue that the Captain should have shown leniency to Billy because the Captain was unaware of the tense relationship between the master-at-arms and Billy. Because he was young, his actions were often misinterpreted by Claggart, who saw Billy's happiness as insubordination. As the alpha male Claggart constantly felt threatened by Billy's charisma. Since killing the master-at-arms was a accident, the captain did not need to enforce the full extent of the law. The faultiness of this reasoning is that if one person were pardoned then everyone else could get away with disobedience.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to that reason it affect his life perspective: "This was a political war, fighting for something without benefiting from it" (Espinoza). It was during this point he felt against war even though he volunteered. Mr. Espinoza felt this should not have happened and the U.S. should not have intervene because it led to so many deaths. He condemns such actions because “some Vietnamese could have been catholic or protestant; it was catholic killing catholic, and protestant killing protestant” (Espinoza). He felt so lucky not to be one of the killers because if he was, it would have stayed in his conscious and would have felt so guilty.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heinz Dilemma Questions

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nicholas also brings up the fact that he could be punished by the law for doing such a thing. His answer did not change when the wife was changed to an animal. He feels that a pet Is not that serious because they are temporary. Nicholas is convinced that it is important do everything possible to save another person’s life to an extent. Nicholas stated “Yes, Heinz broke the law, stealing is wrong and you should not want to go to jail.” He also feels that Heinz is in the wrong for be willing to steal because he wouldn’t have been with his wife in her last and final days, he would be in jail.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the violations of law that Johnson committed, his impeachment was justified. Although Andrew Johnson was supposed to fill Lincoln’s shoes in guiding the country to reform, he did not succeed at this. At the time, the country needed a leader, which would move them past the issues from the Civil War and support the rights of all people. Johnson failed to do this because of his pro-slavery view, breaking…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just because one domino fell doesn 't mean it has to hit the other ones on the way down. The US should have saved its weapons, troops, and time for a country that was a real threat. Ho Chi Minh would have been, in my opinion, a fine ruler for vietnam and would been loved by many. If this is what the people of Vietnam want, they should be able to have it. The US is so afraid to let other countries be happy because they think it will destroy ours happiness.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Still, Hale knew that they were all innocent, but he wanted them to confess anyway so that he may not feel as guilty for taking their lives. In both cases, people wanted the accused to confess to something they had not done. If they had confessed their story would not have been heard, and their would not have been any call to change. Although, Hale was virtuous in wanting them to have their lives, it seemed more so that he wanted them to live for his own benefit. If they had confessed, the crack in the system would still existed until others would die, he did not value those people’s lives because it would have not been his fault.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They protested peacefully, which makes it civil disobedience, which makes this document fit the theme civil disobedience. The last quote that helps this document fit the theme civil disobedience is “we will never obey them. Award us for what punishment you like, we will put up with it.” This helps the document fit them theme civil disobedience because they will peacefully protest by taking punishments than obeying the rules. This means that they dislike the law so much that they would rather get a punishment than to obey the law, this is an example of being civilly disobedient. There is one last document that fits the theme civil disobedience, it is “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and once again this document is a great example of fitting the theme civil…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The effect of the talk between Sarah and Tituba was that both Sarah and Tituba confessed to witchcraft and so they had to keep their “act” up because they know Herrick is going to jail. Miller included it because it was his way of knowing who was lying and who wasn't lying. Parris changes because he is usually the one to protect his reputation, but this time he didn't try to protect it. The news does not affect the court's decision because they don't want to actually admit that this whole time they were wrong for what they been doing. Danforth is a victim of his own logic because Danforth prioritizes something that seems off , over the reality of possible innocence.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays