Character Analysis Of Tom Joad In The Grapes Of Wrath

Improved Essays
John Steinbeck’s protagonist Tom Joad acts as a prime example of a flawed and naturally human character in The Grapes of Wrath. Throughout the novel, Tom faces massive character growth as he sheds his “carpe diem” lifestyle and takes on a concern for humanity. This change displays the growth in Tom’s leadership abilities and his ability to nurture the strength of his family. Tom’s actions and reactions throughout the course of the novel build off of one another, as he undergoes both a physical and mental journey. From the beginning of the novel, when Tom has just been released on parole, he does not feel any regret for killing a man. When Jim Casy asks Tom what he had done, Tom replies, “I’d do what I done--again. I killed a guy in a fight” (35). Tom’s morals justify the killing because he does not know any better. In fact, when describing his act of homicide, Tom takes on a bragging tone and shows no regrets. This displays Tom’s inability to find value in human life as he only cares for himself. If Tom would have been more ashamed of his actions, he would not be so quick to tell about them, but as he cares only for himself, Tom speaks of the murder and his time in McAlester often. His nonchalance …show more content…
While attempting to return home, Tom convinces a truck driver to give him a ride. Originally, the driver says no and points out a sticker that says "No Riders". However, Tom, employing his charm, replies, "... But sometimes a guy 'll be a good guy even if some rich bastard makes him carry a sticker" (11). By saying this, Tom causes an appeal to pathos within the driver. The use of the contrasting ideas of a "good guy" and a "rich bastard" cause strong emotion within the driver because the connotation attached to being a rich bastard is negative. Naturally, people would rather be cast in a positive light than a negative one, so the driver gives him and grants Tom a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Baraban states,“It destroys any hope in Montresor's humanity and highlights once again that Montresor feels no guilt regarding the murder”(Baraban). Baraban is saying Montresor has no sympathy towards the actions he committed, and has always been a seeking revenge on Fortunato because of the hate inside of him. Montresor is a psychopath because he has no feeling of guilt or regret after murdering Fortunato. Montresor’s attitude changes from just a man wanting revenge to a murderous man with only happiness, and satisfaction in mind now that his nemesis is dead. Montresor’s character never changes, but his attitude does.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The narrator’s untrustworthiness is shown by how calmly he narrates what happened on the day he murdered the old guy just to prove he is not insane. The crime that he thought was perfect was not because of his mental defenses crashed down…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To summarize Kessel’s essay, “Creating the Innocent Killer”, Kessel felt no sympathy for Ender. Kessel felt as if the author of Ender’s Game, Orson Scott Card, was manipulating us as the reader to feel bad for someone who doesn’t deserve it. Kessel believes that yes, Ender didn’t intend to do all of these awful things, but that doesn’t change the fact that he still did them. Ender most definitely was not innocent, nor did he deserve to be pitied. Kessel thought that Ender deserved punishment for his murders, and I couldn't agree more with Kessel’s opinion.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plans that Montresor has for Fortuanto are horrifying. Monstresor has no problem burying a man alive. He does not feel guilty for what he has done. He is confessing his crime to an unknown person, but he is not asking for forgiveness, he is almost prideful with what he had done. He is proud that he planned revenge on someone who insulted his family and he's proud that no one has discovered his crime for 50 years.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand, Misfit does not regret what he did with the whole family. He is used to not feel pain at all. He is accused of murder his own father if that does not bother him at all neither the life of others. Some people can manipulate their thoughts to not make them regret their actions. According to Linda Thrasybule "Psychopaths are people who generally lack empathy, don 't feel remorse or guilt for their actions and may use violence or intimidation to get what they want.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this point in his life, The Misfit says "I don 't want no hep...I 'm doing all right by myself" (O 'Connor 1294). It is difficult to understand what is "all right" and what is not because since he has extreme views on life now, there is no way to differentiate right from wrong. Also, he believes that "the crime don 't matter. You can do one thing or you can do another, kill a man or take a tire off his car," because regardless of what the crime was, a punishment will come in due time (O 'Connor 1295). With this thought process, it leads into his belief that it does not matter whether he kills anyone or not.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only does he want his audience to know that he is the victim but also, wants his readers to know that he has a very good reason for the awful incident that he has committed. It is as if he is bluffing when he states this quote. Sort of as if he is saying “how can a perfect, calm man commit such a crime”. This makes the audience think that he had a very good reason to do what he did, even though the audience knows the poor old man did nothing…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing the absurdity of the world, Meursault is not afraid of expressing his opinion on matters concerning him. In fact, Meursault despises dishonesty as we see in the newspaper mentioning the story of a man wanting to surprise his mother and sister with his wealth by concealing his identity, but was killed by them in a robbery by them. Although many would pity this ridiculous death, Meursault thinks that ‘the traveler pretty much deserved what he got and that you should never play games (pg 80).” Another case when he is honest is when Marie ask if he loves her to which he responds that it didn’t matter to him and that he doesn’t love her, and he doesn’t care if they get married. Such a statement could depict Meursault as heartless and incapable of feeling love, but he is just expressing his opinion on the social construct of marriage and the hollow expressions of love. Understanding this, after the initial shock, Marie responds by stating that he is ‘peculiar’ and that ‘that is the reason she loved him’ (pg 42).…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most distinctive phrase of Capote's novel was, "I didn't want to harm the man. I thought he was a very nice gentleman. Soft-spoken. I thought so right up to the moment I cut his throat." (157) This was said by Smith, and proves very clearly that they had no reason to murder the family and had no conscious that murdering a man who had done nothing to him was bad.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With the use of imagery Capote is able to accurately exemplify the effect that the murders had on Perry, a genuinely good person who unfortunately got involved with the wrong crowd. The description of the flashbacks he recalls from that show how much he regrets partaking in the murder with Dick. He remembers their desperate cries for help before their lives tragically ended, his surroundings, the bodies. He suffers at the simple thought of killing the Clutter family knowing how wrong it was, yet Dick feels no remorse at all. Capote does this in order to impose his own agenda upon the reader.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays