Option B: Practice Based Reflective Account.
There is pro and cons towards improving the pre preparation for exercise stress test in Ischemic Heart Disease patient whether is necessary for them or not. Pros and cons is an arguments in favour and against certain decision, motion or course of action of the patients examiners. The pros and cons will determine the critical routine before preparing the test which is the examiners will use the term to gather information from their patients. More than 40% of the patients cannot continue with the test because lack of proper information and instruction by the medical officer during the appointment. …show more content…
Every documentation of the patient’s symptoms, medications, past and current significant illnesses, and usual level of physical activity helps the medical officer to detect if an exercise stress test is appropriate to the patients or not. Patients must do some physical examination and it must consider about the patient’s ability to do the exercise, together with any signs of acute or serious disease that might be affect the test results or the patient’s ability to perform the test. All of the test report need to contains comments about the maximal heart rate, level of exercise achieved, and symptoms, arrhythmias, electrocardiographic changes and some irregular signs during exercise. The report usually will allow the medical officer to determine if the test was maximal or submaximal. Quality of the test and its performance also need to be add to the validity of the results, thus, it conclude that the section of the test report indicates whether the test result were positive, negative, equal or unequal. Then, the medical officer must have further treatment to indicate obtaining optional information about the coronary heart disease and ischemic risk if the results of the test were equal or vice