Social Changes In Huckleberry Finn

Superior Essays
Mark Twain lived through the Civil War and the Reconstruction Era. The goal for Reconstruction was to achieve full and political equality for blacks and future generations. During the Reconstruction Era, political change was easy to achieve. For the Confederate States to be readmitted back into the Union, the states had to have at least ten percent of the voting population to pledge full loyalty to the Union. Political change was easy to achieve, but social change was not. It was difficult for whites to adjust with freed slaves, which therefore caused racism and prejudice. Through the characters in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain criticizes the morals of a civilized society. In the beginning of the novel Twain depicts the society …show more content…
As Jim and Huck Finn become closer, Huck Finn feels guilty for helping a slave run away from his owner, and helping him to freedom. Even though no one from society is on the raft to shape the views of Huck Finn, the norms of society still lingers in Huck Finn’s thoughts. As the journey of Huck Finn and Jim progresses, Huck Finn begins to have a guilty conscience for helping Jim escape, and for stealing Miss Watson’s property. Twain portrays his criticized views through Huck Finn’s guilty conscience, “I felt good and all washed clean of sin for the first time” (213). Huck Finn does not even think twice about why Jim ran away from Miss Watson, but he does think twice about going to hell and committing a sin. Huck Finn does not think twice about Jim because Huck was taught that a slave is essentially, not a human, but property. Historically, slaves were not considered humans, but as property. An example would be the Dred Scott v. Sandford landmark case. Dred Scott believed he was a freed slave, since he entered a free state, while Sandford (slave owner) argued that Scott is not free due to the 5th Amendment, “No man shall be deprived of life, liberty and property”. The case decided in favor of Sanford. This case also declares Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional because it deprives property owners (slave owners) and men their right to own

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although men like Fredrick Douglass in document 2 (“What to the slave is the fourth of the July?”) expressed that the constitution was a “glorious liberty document” which ensured the freedom of ALL men, the constitution has no explicit mentioning of slavery. No where in the constitution does it say, verbatim, that slavery is to be abolished. Despite the fact that they had the ability to do so, the framers of the constitution chose NOT to remove slavery from the document. Even if they hadn’t removed slavery, they failed to free their slaves (for the most part) and Thomas Jefferson has his reasoning. Jefferson declares, in a letter to John Hope, that “.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1836 Taliaferro wed Dred Scott to Virginia slave, Harriet Robinson. In 1836 marriage was illegal to slaves, yet Dred Scott was legally wed to his wife by a state officiator. So in technical terms, if Dred Scott were a slave he would not have been allowed to be wed or to have been officially wed to his wife Dred Scott was considered a free man. Had Chief Justice Taney followed his duties to access all evidence presented in the court, such as evidence of Dred Scott being known as a enough of free man, or at the least not a piece of…

    • 1855 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery was common in the 1800’s, and so the thought of free men were white, but there were also freed slaves, it would only happen if their master granted them freedom. But, Douglass’ speech is about how unfair it is to be a Negro slave and how they are treated poorly and even though they are men, they are treated horribly and they receive no freedom. They work all day, and they even learn how to read and write for their own survival. Just because they are slaves, it doesn’t mean that they cannot be treated as if they are not human. Douglass points out their hardship and burdens that they carry, but he also states what they are capable of, and that they are trying to prove to the free men that they are not just slaves, they are men that can…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 13th amendment banned slavery in America, the 14th granted citizenship for all who were born in America, and the 15th, which prevented citizens from ineligibility to vote due to race. These amendments were set in place to ensure freedom and equality for all liberated slaves. However, state laws could still enforce racial inequality with Jim Crow laws. The Jim Crow laws enforced the idea of “separate but equal”. At first glance, separate but equal does not sound all that bad, but blacks were still not treated the same as a white male.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This slave, Dred Scott, stated that his residence in a free state made him a free man. He won the suit in a lower court, however, he lost in the Missouri Supreme Court. The Southern majority of the United States ruled that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery due to the Missouri Compromise. Southern justices also stated that African Americans have no stand in court if they were slaves, or if their ancestors were slaves. The court ruled that Scott did not in fact have legal rights in court, therefore, he devastatingly could not sue for his own freedom.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott then got another suit government court. Scott 's lord kept up that no immaculate blooded Negro of African plunge and the relative of slaves could be a national in the feeling of Article III of the Constitution. At the point when the Army requested his lord to retreat to Missouri, he brought Scott with him back to that slave state, where his lord kicked the bucket. In 1846, Scott was aided by (abolitionist servitude) legal advisors to sue for his opportunity in court, asserting he ought to be free since he had lived on free soil for quite a while. The case went the distance to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tying in with Stephen Douglas was the Dred Scott court case. Dred Scott was an African American who sued for his freedom on the basis that he lived on free soil, and was therefore free. However, the court decided that because Scott was a black slave, and not a citizen, he could not sue in federal court. As a result, African Americans were no longer citizens in both the North and South. This case also dictated that there was no such thing as a free state.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since no one is truly born to be a slave, Aristotle’s justification is invalid according to Rawls. In his first principle, basic liberties, slaves have no liberties or say in the government and therefore Aristotle’s view is again invalid. Another thing is that slaves are not given potions and can not vote like women of the time, so how are slaves benefiting if they have no voice? Even Rawls contracts the slaves did not agree or sell themselves to slavery to was forced upon them. “It is fair what is agreed to?” (Rawls Right Thing To Do page 143) If a…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The slave does not have the power to change the law, nor the power to leave and move to a place where he can leave freely; the system is rigged in the master’s favor. In this situation, I believe, that it would be just and moral for the slave to try and escape since that would be the only way for the slave to live a good life. As a slave, he is just living as property with no rights. The only way for the slave to live a just and good life as he sees fit is by escaping. It is only okay to break the law, not if men have wronged you, but the system that is there to uphold justice and morality is corrupt and does not allow you to live…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He made small decisions to the courtroom and dress wear, for instance like wearing an efficient outfit underneath the robe at all times. One of Taney’s major cases was the Dred Scott v. Sanford. In this case, basically a African American slave named, Dred Scott, lived in a free state and a free territory of Wisconsin, but when he moved to Missouri he wanted to keep his freedom, until a Caucasian man wanted to be his owner. Scott took this to court and wanted to sue, and ask for freedom. At the end of this trial, Taney decided that, since Scott is African American and technically not a citizen in the United States, he cannot sue the Caucasian man.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays