Essay On The Federalist Papers

Improved Essays
The Federalist Papers are considered to be one of the founding classics of American political thought. The federalist Papers was a part of a major national argument on the ratification of the constitution. Although many thought the papers which supported the Constitution, gave the national government extended powers, and minimized the state powers. However the true intention of the federalist papers was to extinguish the fears and promote the importance of the Constitution. Only with a strong central government, then political prosperity will come true.
To begin with, the federalist papers believed that only with a strong central government where the people will be protected. For example, “You must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place, oblige it to control itself.” This was said by James Madison, The Federalist Papers. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists completely oppose the idea of a strong government, they believe it will give too much power to the national government, and cost state government to
…show more content…
The lacks of the bill of rights were another importance aspect contributes to their concern. And it was also their campaign against the ratification of the constitution. “The progress of a commercial society begets luxury, the parent of inequality, the foe to virtue, and the enemy to restraint.” However the federalist had answers to all the complains from the Anti-federalist. For example, the separation of powers, this divided the powers into three independent branches, which protected the rights of the people. “To all general purposes we have uniformly been one people each individual citizen everywhere enjoying the same national rights, privileges, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The governments had rights that benefited the country and people. The Federalist Papers created a new government and protected against…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The anti-federalists feared that the central government would become too powerful and that if the government would commit an infraction on the states’ rights. The Federalists were in agreement with the constitution. The federalists were wealthy, well educated and were unified by the thought of higher power. The leaders of the Federalists included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton both yearned for an effective constitution. In contrast, the Anti-federalists were generally farmers and anybody that fell below the line of being wealthy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist prevailed because they identified the proper path to American prosperity. Centralization is an imperative facet of a successful national government, thus eliminating governmental dissention between states. A sectionalist government was not adequate for the United Sates, a newborn nation requiring unity. The Federalists and Republican debate can be justifiably attributed as the fountainhead of the political party system. The ratification of the Constitution outlines the powers and rights of the government, ensuring the citizens free from oppression and tyranny.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers to create a strong government that would last. The Federalists wanted to create a Federal Government that would be strong and unite states as one. The Federalists were wealthy people and plantation owners. In order to counter the anti-Federalists Madison argued that under the Constitution the government does not cause harm to individual states. Madison begins the essay with end goals to show how the government would help, and to try to convince the people that this is the way it should be.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While there were many more issues than those two, the new Constitution was the answer to the mounting problems of the day and how to prevent similar future crisis. It is unknown how much of an effect that the Federalist Papers had in influencing the public's view of the Constitution, but the articles are important today as they help us to determine the intention for the Constitution and how it applies today.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The federalists support the constitution and want a strong national government. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison were federalists. Most federalists are wealthy, educated and believe a strong national government should control the nation. The federalist papers were a series of essays in newspapers that were put together in a book in 1788 to support the constitution.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Two groups that played a key role were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in having a strong central government, whereas Anti-Federalists waned the majority of the power given to the people and were wary of the government having too much control. These groups are similar to Authoritarians and Libertarians of today’s society, respectively. In fact, these group’s differing beliefs sparked one of the disagreements surrounding the Constitution, “One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalist felt greatly upset by the Federalist ratification of the Constitution, which had shifted state power into federal hands, while the Federalists wished to keep a Bill of Rights out of the Constitution, because they believed that they could not list each right, and that the rights unstated would be broken and abused. The Federalists eventually won the ratification of the Constitution in large part because they set up the ratification process in a way that would be favorable to them. They had new conventions which were held in states that were favorable to their position first, and they required only 9 of the 13 states to ratify, although the Articles of Confederation had clearly stated that all 13 states would be required in order to agree to any amendments to the…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the creation of a national bank would not be sufficient, as it was not stated within the Constitution. Generally speaking the Federalists had stronger support for the Constitution because they created it. Alongside this, the Anti-Federalists pledged for lower taxes, as most of them were farmers from the south. In comparison most Federalists were generally buisiness men from the north. One of the key differences between the two was the idea of a Bill of Rights.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays